mcms

On Feb 28, 2019, the Indian Ministry of Defence arranged a joint press briefing to salvage the reputation and professionalism of the Indian armed forces following their own foolish and unbelievable ‘surgical strike’ in Balakot area of Pakistani side of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan’s counter strike in response, not only was highly successful but also yielded the ultimate prize of two Indian Air Force fighters being shot down and one pilot being captured. Maj Gen Surinder Singh Mahal, Rear Adm T S Gujral and AVM Kapur were paraded before the press to provide incontrovertible ‘evidence’ to prove that IAF operations were highly successful while PAF’s were a failure.

What they implicitly managed to prove was the exact opposite. The press briefing started two hours late. The three services’ representatives appeared confused and under-confident. They were being forced to say something when they had nothing to say. They couldn’t provide evidence about the damage they had caused during the surgical strike, or of the F-16 they claimed to have shot down. They sought take moral high ground that they had attacked non-military targets while Pakistan had escalated the conflict by attacking military targets. When the media pressed for details, the spokespersons tried to hide behind the scope of the briefing and operational confidentiality. To a question as to what Indian forces would do henceforth, the answer was: ask him [sic] meaning Pakistan.

The earth-shaking evidence that was shown was a damaged part of an AMRAAM 120C missile. The details imprinted on the shown part when checked with indicated that these missiles had been sold to Taiwan.

Thus the only truth they were able to establish was that F-16 did undertake some operations. That’s hardly a fact worth mentioning. Once taken on, they couldn’t prove that F-16 had been shot down. As a Pakistani observer it was heartening to see the disarray the PAF operations had caused in the Indian armed forces, especially to IAF. The later would be forced to reevaluate its strategy and tactics. They would oscillate between desperation neither to respond and caution nor to repeat their mistakes.

The press briefing illustrated the truism: that truth gets out of a crack, while falsehood gets stuck in a doorway. In the instant case, it seemed to stick in the throats of the Indian spokespersons. The truth is that whatever PAF has claimed as its success, is backed by evidence, which would be released at an opportune time. The Indian armed forces may seem to be winning the war of trolls on social and electronic media, but the PAF has won the first two rounds. Without being triumphant, PAF realises and awaits the challenges of the ongoing hostilities. As always, the righteousness of its cause to defend the nation, it is prepared for the long haul. India on the other hand carried out aggression following a pre-meditated conspiracy by Narendra Modi to carry out a false-flag operation, killing its own soldiers with the malicious intent to blame it on Pakistan. Whatever ensued on Indian media was a make-believe narrative aimed at getting votes for BJP in the imminent elections by stoking anti-Pakistan sentiments. Only time will tell that whether PAF had thwarted Modi’s reelections?

The writer is the President at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »