aviation

Observers of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic have already ascribed many monikers to the economic crisis that has sprung in the contagion’s wake. While each speaks to the destruction and paralysis that the world economy faces, they all allude to varying aspects of the collective crisis: Great Lockdown; Covid Depression; and Corona-Recession already being some of the most popular.

Given the multifaceted nature of the pandemic’s economic tremors, another name that warrants mention in the list is the “Great Aerospace Crisis,” because perhaps more than any other economic sector, international aerospace activity has been disproportionately haemorrhaged by coronavirus.

The aerospace sector has been “brought down to earth” by the worldwide contagion in large part to the collapse of international passenger traffic through a set of global quarantines that have affected an estimated 2.3 billion people for different intervals since the beginning of 2020. Confinement precludes flight, and air traffic has virtually grounded to a halt as a result.The ramifications for the aerospace sector are immense. According to IATA, which acts as the global trade body for the aviation industry, more than 25 million jobs in both the aerospace and aviation sectors face a grave risk without large-scale government interventions in the form of rescue packages.

Brian Burridge, who is the chief executive of the Royal Aeronautical Society, suggests that the Global Aerospace Crisis will last several years and might shrink the airline ecosystem by 50%. In his words, “out of the world’s nearly 1,000 airlines, a lot are just bubbles of debt with wings,” such that some airlines will face shrinkages, and others outright collapse. Burridge came to Pakistan in early March, 2020, to speak at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies’ (CASS) international conference titled “Global Strategic Threat and Response.”

The large aerospace giants are haemorrhaging cash throughout this lockdown phase, and according to the CEO of Delta Airlines, the largest carrier in the world, the current grounding of 600 aircraft is resulting in a loss of $60m per day. On the other side of the Atlantic, the second quarter of 2020 will likely result in a 90 per cent loss in capacity for European airlines if current restrictions continue. Because of this, estimates of the annual revenue passenger kilometres (RPKs) for the continent’s aviation industry are to decline by at least 55 per cent.In a recent conference call, the CEO of Airbus has cautioned that the aviation industry could take as between three to five years to recover to levels seen before Covid-19. In the first quarter of calendar year 2020, Airbus was unable to deliver 60 planes to customers due to quarantine restrictions. Its downstream customers, including British Airways, have announced job cuts in the tens of thousands, due the drop in passenger demand.

It is striking to see how rapid the collapse of the aerospace sector has been. As recently as February, 2020, the global aerospace giants Boeing and Airbus had confidently predicted demand for more than 40,000 aircraft worth nearly $7 trillion over the next two decades years. Indeed, the recent trends in aviation and aerospace had shown great promise, and the consensus was for a steady increase in global air traffic due to heightened demand from emerging markets.

Yet many airlines now face imminent bankruptcies, as the now widely touted Virgin Australia case shows where the public hostility to the airline, specifically its flamboyant billionaire-owner Richard Branson, made a bailout politically unfeasible. In addition, there is the controversy regarding tax evasion by airlines and cruise companies, who register themselves in tax havens – Virgin may qualify for government assistance in UK but not Australia. 

However, the aerospace and airline industries should not be dismissed out of hand for fiscal rescue, despite the profligacy of their executives (particularly in Western countries such as the United States and Australia), where they have shamelessly paid themselves enormous bonuses via stock buyback inflation in recent years while failing to save for a rainy day.

The economic potency of the aerospace industry must be kept in mind. It pays above-average wages, fosters technological innovations, and allows aerospace-exporting countries to generate healthy trade surpluses. In 2018, the EU aerospace sector earned €94 billion, and was thus responsible for the most significant share of the EU’s high-tech exports. Meanwhile, US civil aerospace exports were worth $122 billion, also helping to alleviate some of the pressure from the US’s widening trade deficit.

While there are few silver linings due to both the severity of the coronavirus pandemic and the unpredictability of its duration, one important point that aerospace companies are highlighting is the “opportunity” that the lockdown provides for a transition to newer planes that have lower carbon emissions. If anything, this can help the sector to address the potentially greater long-term challenge of achieving carbon neutrality.Nevertheless, the Great Aerospace Crisis is likely to be one of the most glaring examples of wanton destruction wrought by the coronavirus pandemic, and it is one of the sectors that confronts the most far-reaching economic impact that is likely to felt over an extended horizon.

– The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in The Nation newspaper. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »