aviation

Observers of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic have already ascribed many monikers to the economic crisis that has sprung in the contagion’s wake. While each speaks to the destruction and paralysis that the world economy faces, they all allude to varying aspects of the collective crisis: Great Lockdown; Covid Depression; and Corona-Recession already being some of the most popular.

Given the multifaceted nature of the pandemic’s economic tremors, another name that warrants mention in the list is the “Great Aerospace Crisis,” because perhaps more than any other economic sector, international aerospace activity has been disproportionately haemorrhaged by coronavirus.

The aerospace sector has been “brought down to earth” by the worldwide contagion in large part to the collapse of international passenger traffic through a set of global quarantines that have affected an estimated 2.3 billion people for different intervals since the beginning of 2020. Confinement precludes flight, and air traffic has virtually grounded to a halt as a result.The ramifications for the aerospace sector are immense. According to IATA, which acts as the global trade body for the aviation industry, more than 25 million jobs in both the aerospace and aviation sectors face a grave risk without large-scale government interventions in the form of rescue packages.

Brian Burridge, who is the chief executive of the Royal Aeronautical Society, suggests that the Global Aerospace Crisis will last several years and might shrink the airline ecosystem by 50%. In his words, “out of the world’s nearly 1,000 airlines, a lot are just bubbles of debt with wings,” such that some airlines will face shrinkages, and others outright collapse. Burridge came to Pakistan in early March, 2020, to speak at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies’ (CASS) international conference titled “Global Strategic Threat and Response.”

The large aerospace giants are haemorrhaging cash throughout this lockdown phase, and according to the CEO of Delta Airlines, the largest carrier in the world, the current grounding of 600 aircraft is resulting in a loss of $60m per day. On the other side of the Atlantic, the second quarter of 2020 will likely result in a 90 per cent loss in capacity for European airlines if current restrictions continue. Because of this, estimates of the annual revenue passenger kilometres (RPKs) for the continent’s aviation industry are to decline by at least 55 per cent.In a recent conference call, the CEO of Airbus has cautioned that the aviation industry could take as between three to five years to recover to levels seen before Covid-19. In the first quarter of calendar year 2020, Airbus was unable to deliver 60 planes to customers due to quarantine restrictions. Its downstream customers, including British Airways, have announced job cuts in the tens of thousands, due the drop in passenger demand.

It is striking to see how rapid the collapse of the aerospace sector has been. As recently as February, 2020, the global aerospace giants Boeing and Airbus had confidently predicted demand for more than 40,000 aircraft worth nearly $7 trillion over the next two decades years. Indeed, the recent trends in aviation and aerospace had shown great promise, and the consensus was for a steady increase in global air traffic due to heightened demand from emerging markets.

Yet many airlines now face imminent bankruptcies, as the now widely touted Virgin Australia case shows where the public hostility to the airline, specifically its flamboyant billionaire-owner Richard Branson, made a bailout politically unfeasible. In addition, there is the controversy regarding tax evasion by airlines and cruise companies, who register themselves in tax havens – Virgin may qualify for government assistance in UK but not Australia. 

However, the aerospace and airline industries should not be dismissed out of hand for fiscal rescue, despite the profligacy of their executives (particularly in Western countries such as the United States and Australia), where they have shamelessly paid themselves enormous bonuses via stock buyback inflation in recent years while failing to save for a rainy day.

The economic potency of the aerospace industry must be kept in mind. It pays above-average wages, fosters technological innovations, and allows aerospace-exporting countries to generate healthy trade surpluses. In 2018, the EU aerospace sector earned €94 billion, and was thus responsible for the most significant share of the EU’s high-tech exports. Meanwhile, US civil aerospace exports were worth $122 billion, also helping to alleviate some of the pressure from the US’s widening trade deficit.

While there are few silver linings due to both the severity of the coronavirus pandemic and the unpredictability of its duration, one important point that aerospace companies are highlighting is the “opportunity” that the lockdown provides for a transition to newer planes that have lower carbon emissions. If anything, this can help the sector to address the potentially greater long-term challenge of achieving carbon neutrality.Nevertheless, the Great Aerospace Crisis is likely to be one of the most glaring examples of wanton destruction wrought by the coronavirus pandemic, and it is one of the sectors that confronts the most far-reaching economic impact that is likely to felt over an extended horizon.

– The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in The Nation newspaper. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »