Hindutva

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government is an ultranationalist regime that has taken the reins of power in India on the basis of a self-proclaimed role to promote Hindutva. This self-professed obligation would bind them to some form of adherence to the basic concepts of the Hinduism, would it not?

One phenomenon that is found in Hindu conceptualizations of the world is the notion of Karmic justice: as you sow, so shall you reap. In the battered Indian economy we see today, there is an undercurrent of Karmic justice that is difficult to miss.

Yet it would add insult to the injury of India’s flailing government that its Karmic retribution is a product entirely of its own doing. The BJP has driven the economy into disastrous circumstances, and whatever poor results are now being reported, the number is certain to be worse, because the BJP has systematically engaged in a program of deception by overstating economic ‘successes’ and understating economic failures.

Indeed, the so-called ‘data system’ used by the BJP government has numerous methodological problems and is susceptible to manipulation, because of which the official annual GDP growth rates of 7-8% since 2011 have wildly overstated actual growth. And now, the high-frequency indicators in India show that exports and imports have together fallen in the current fiscal year. The production of investment goods was also fallen, while the production of consumer goods and real government tax receipts are essentially stagnant.

At the same time, a brutal credit crunch has reduced commercial lending to less than Rs1tn in the first six months of this fiscal year, which is less than one-sixth of its level in the previous fiscal year. To senseless push consumers and firms to live beyond their means is ripe for Karmic judgement!

In essence, the BJP has now brought the bombastically advertised Indian economy into a balance-sheet crisis. Ever since the Global Financial Crisis (2008-09), corporate profitability in has been extremely low in India, which has caused the share of debt owed by sick companies (i.e. those that do not generate enough cash to service interest payments) to balloon to 40%.

With sick companies owing 40% of the overall corporate debt, a contagion is likely to emerge in any country. But in a Bollywood-esque economy that distorts reality to the convenience of the powerful, the farce is allowed to continue and the economic disease festers.

The BJP’s La-la-land approach towards society in general is as clearly reflected in its economic mismanagement. This is, after all, a society that lionizes a pilot like Wing Commander Abhinandhan who tried to be an aggressor but was swiftly shot down by the Pakistan Air Force and handed back as act of mercy. The spirit of deception runs deep in the BJP’s psyche, but the fear of karmic justice does not.

The economic lapses were also failures of the BJP’s own doing. No one from abroad had coerced the BJP into instating the demonetization fiasco which decimated the livelihoods of many poor in India. Nor was it imposed from outside that the BJP needed to constantly exaggerate its economic statistics. It would have been better to grow honestly at 4% than at 7% dishonestly.

Going forward, India does not have the macro­economic tools to get the economy going. The quickest tool, monetary policy, isn’t effective in India because the Reserve Bank’s rate cuts do not get passed on to regular consumers, instead being horded by the private banks who have stressed balance sheets and a new-found aversion to risk. The other main tool of fiscal policy is also constrained because public sector deficits are ballooning to double-digit levels while interest rates remain higher than growth rates, and primary deficits remain elevated.

If the BJP wishes to fix the Indian economy, it needs to understand that rhetoric will only take it so far. As for its rhetoric on the economy, the BJP must realize that a credit-binge is not the answer for well-distributed and sustainable growth.

As for its rhetoric on Pakistan, it needs to realize that the common man in India is struggling too much to bear any more foreign demons, especially when Pakistan has taken a mature and responsible stance through gestures such as the Kartarpur Corridor and handing over Abhinandhan as a message of peace.

As for its rhetoric about Hindutva, the BJP needs to understand the importance of Karmic justice as a retribution for its deceits. The responsibility of sovereigns in Hinduism is to act with compassion and consideration for the ruled, so that the ruler’s karmic integrity is kept intact. With the unravelling of the Indian economy, the BJP is ensuring that very little of the already flimsy Indian republic shall be left intact.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in Daily Times newspaper. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »