Murree

The recent tragedy during a blizzard in Murree involving many stranded domestic tourists is illustrative of an industry that took the free market ideology a bit too closely to heart. 22 citizens, including 10 small children, died from the cold or asphyxiation while stuck in their cars during the blizzard, unable to seek warm shelter in time. According to eyewitness accounts that became viral on social media, the local hotel industry sought to profiteer from the desperation of the stranded families. They were asking for up to Rs.70,000 or more for a room during the desperate conditions, and very few people in this country carry such money on their persons in normal circumstances.

The heavy snowfall had led to road blockages, uprooting trees and creating other hazards, while an influx of tourists had come to enjoy the unusually rich snow levels. The glut of tourists that came were voluntary market participants, one might surmise, and the hotels were voluntary sellers of a service. They simply couldn’t arrive at an agreeable price, and so were turned away into the cold. Is the problem with that? Not for the free market ideologue; but our social norms and values were shaken by the lack of sympathy and generosity in Murree’s hotels during the snowstorm.

The hotels did not, at the time, entertain considerations such as people’s safety – they simply saw a useful transaction opportunity, and those that could not afford it were turned away to sleep in their cars and risk death by asphyxiation. In response, the Rawalpindi district administration has sealed fifteen hotels for overcharging citizens thus far, not least because of pressure due to the widespread outrage generated on social media. The hotels are on Abu Dhabi Road, Kuldana Road, Upper Jhika Gali Road and Bank Road.

What one sees, therefore, is an economic logic running contrary to ethical standards and values of mutual aid and solidarity, as well an insufficient ex-ante deterrent to violation of such standards by a regulatory body. The basis for assuring quality assurance in the hotel industry already exist on the books, including in the Pakistan Hotels & Restaurants Act (1976), and the Travel Agencies Act (1976). Instead, the mushrooming of third-rate enterprises in scenic areas of Murree (and indeed further north) has been done in an ad-hoc manner where standards for everything have been ignored: building codes, zoning laws, room quality, amenity provision, and indeed room charges. One of the most beautiful areas of the country has therefore taken on a grotesque every-man-for-himself aura with unplanned human encroachment.

The philosopher Achilles Mbembe has posited the idea of a necroeconomy, where capitalist structures can turn death itself into a commoditizing process. The necroeconomy of Murree is in full swing, and it bodes ill for the domestic tourist industry which requires standardization and best practices to flourish. One has heard much (especially before the pandemic) about the tourism potential of the country, particularly for foreigners to come and appreciate the rich natural and human tapestry of Pakistan.

Yet from an economic standpoint, international tourism’s foreign exchange potential notwithstanding, a healthy domestic tourist market would be an even bigger boon for the economy, as citizens from around the country could flock to appreciate the beauty of the North in a manner that is safe, comfortable, reliable, and still lucrative. What one sees booming in the hotels of Murree, however, is Mbembe’s foreboding of a necroeconomy: pay the scalping prices or go sit in your car to die.

One needn’t even build a hotel to participate in profiteering for misery. The Rawalpindi police has arrested a man recently for swindling stranded tourists under the pretense of helping them in Murree, first throwing hefty amounts snow onto the road to create blockades, and then as a police tweet indicates: “when vehicles would get stuck, he would ask for a significant amount of money in return for towing the car with the help of his jeep.”

While the public mourns the plight of tourists who died while seeking to spend a nice day with families in the snow-covered hills and mountains, there are deeper ethical-economic considerations at play which one must consider. Without such society-wide reflection, one risks falling prey not just to blizzards of snow, but to blizzards of wickedness and greed. Those are the blizzards that are certain to cause our collective asphyxiation.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image Source: Ali, Kalbe. 2022. “Met Office’S Heavy Snowfall Warnings Went Unheeded”. DAWN.COMhttps://www.dawn.com/news/1668392/met-offices-heavy-snowfall-warnings-went-unheeded.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »