Related_Image_-_updated

2500 years ago, the Chinese sage Sun Tzu laid certain strategic precepts which not only remain valid but are widely practised across the globe. Sun Tzu’s masterpiece The Art of War has been translated into more than 100 languages, including Urdu, and forms part of the curriculum of major defence universities, colleges, and other institutions of repute. This article is aimed at highlighting the significance of his particular dictum about protracted wars and conflicts. Several states have violated this dictum at different times in history with similar results: destruction, stalemate, ruined economies, and prolonged human suffering. The Twentieth Century is replete with such wars and conflicts starting with World War I (1914-18), after which nearly the whole of Europe needed to be rebuilt. The Treaty of Versailles signed between the victors and losers was meant to ensure that the Germans would never be able to stand on their feet, and therefore, the world would be a safer place to live. The formation of the League of Nations on 10 January 1920, was also for the same purpose. However, under Adolf Hitler, Germany was ready to storm Europe within two decades.

Prolonged wars, as prophesied by Sun Tzu, bring no benefit to any of the stakeholders. History is replete with examples of wars and conflicts which lasted years. However, without going too far back into history, this article will only review the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, which has the potential to expand horizontally as well as vertically.

While recognising the genuine security concerns of Russia due to North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) eastward expansion, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa did not endorse Russia’s Ukrainian campaign. He was speaking at the Second Islamabad Security Dialogue on 2 April 2022. General Bajwa categorically stated that Pakistan is against ‘camp politics’ and urged the Russian government to cease hostilities to save precious lives.

While NATO has been expanding its frontiers since the demise of the erstwhile Soviet Union on December 31, 1991, successive Russian leadership had been warning about the consequences if its “red line” was crossed. Since Ukraine was Russia’s red line and as the narrative goes, Ukrainian leadership was keen to join the European Union (EU) as well as NATO, the Kremlin could not remain silent and ordered its forces to cross the international border on February 24, 2022.

The Russia-Ukraine war is now at least six weeks old and cannot be categorised as a protracted war as yet. However, the ongoing hostilities are a consequence of the protracted conflict between Cold War rivals. NATO countries were providing arms and equipment to Ukraine and in a way preparing it to oppose Russia’s insistence that Kyiv must not join NATO due to its legitimate security concerns.

Ukraine, though much smaller and relatively weaker than its much larger and militarily stronger opponent Russia, has been able to withstand the pressures of Russian forces with more advanced weapon systems provided by her Western neighbours. This particular aspect was highlighted by Pakistan’s COAS General Bajwa as well that the lesson one can draw from the ongoing war is that relatively weaker armed forces can put up a reasonable resistance with modern weapons. He called for the need to modernise the Armed Forces with state-of-the-art equipment to cater to numerical strengths in an evolving geostrategic environment.

On the other hand, the Russian campaign has not progressed as planned. Russia’s foremost political objective was to ensure that Ukraine accepts the latter’s supremacy in the region and the condition of not joining NATO in times to come. Moreover, Kyiv must not resist Russian forces’ ingress and accept its prescription of peace in the region. Hence, Moscow’s campaign has started to expand and is not likely to end anytime soon due to Western support for the Ukrainian resistance.

While Russian security concerns are well supported, the probability of resolving the issue through a short and swift kinetic action seems a far cry. Russia seems to have violated Sun Tzu’s precepts of avoiding a prolonged war to achieve certain political objectives. With every passing day on the battlefield, global anger against Moscow will increase, for which US-led Western powers are constantly working. Images of dead bodies and destroyed infrastructure would further raise concerns among the neutrals. Moreover, the harsh sanctions imposed on Russia by the US-led Western powers would further lead to increase in energy prices and hurt the country’s economy.

In my opinion, Russia must make an effort to quickly achieve its politico-military objectives in Ukraine and avoid getting into the syndrome of mission creep, which may raise the likelihood of a larger conflict in the region.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’ and ‘South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace.’ He is presently working as Director (Peace and Conflict Studies) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Times.He can be contacted at: [email protected]

Image Source: Etfa Khurshid Mirza


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »