Statesmen- AVM Faheem - Article thematic Image - OCT b

Despite all the known and unknown ills of democracy, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States of America (US) have remained the two classical beacons of enviable traditions of democratic values, practices and products.  Nonetheless, since quite some time, both specimens have started to reveal the consequences of a weak democratic architect, especially if the power of majority good get corrupted through mal-intended flow of engineered information.  May the governance scheme be of parliamentary nature or of presidential form, the entire edifice of the democratic system; the selection of the best (available) representatives by informed constituents, implodes causing irreparable system fractures; if the fundamentals of democratic traditions are compromised.  

While the cracks in UK democratic construct have somehow been alleviating through invisible royal interventions and support, the same redemption has not been available to the US system and its President(s).  An overall decay in democratic traditions and societal values in the US started to become visible since the US became the sole great power on the global stage.  It can be safely implicated that demise of a challenging power triggered a decline in the standards of US democratic norms and quality; and ushered a rise of unilateralism, arrogance and abuse of power.  The culmination of 20th and beginning of 21st Century saw the rise of such democratic leadership that shamed the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot etc. in pursuit of their ugly and atrocious desires.  In absence of a matching contestant, world’s leading democracy played havoc in the name of ‘New World Order’, butchering millions of innocent humans in the guise of ‘bringing democracy’ to the presumed oppressed; but with ultimate objectives to settle personal vendettas, commandeer others’ resources and secure own corporate empires.

This vulgar display of arrogance, ludicrousness and contradictions is touching its global zenith within contemporary decade.  The rise of brazen (racist) nationalist tendencies across six continents has deeply afflicted humanity, with little hope for revision towards truth, justice, equality or humanity.  The law of the jungle, ‘might is right’ has been established by the powerful as the order of the new world.  Application of selective justice and humanistic outcries as in cases of Indian atrocities against Kashmiri freedom struggle vis-Ă -vis Uighur Muslims’ plight and many other similar selective indulgences clearly manifest the West’s respect for human rights or their concerns for human sufferings.  Their ongoing discriminating and fastidious approach in sharing knowledge and technology; and granting unprecedented, illegitimate and unjustified amnesty to the domesticated and obedient few, like India, has not only unbalanced global geopolitics but also introduced an unparalleled volatility and instability in international order.

As a consequence of intensifying US phobia towards prospective multipolarity, the decade old US courtship with India has been on a unilateral upward trajectory.  Persistent US endeavours to appease and gratify India in order to make it stand against rising China and/or to relinquish her historic relationship with revisionist Russia have borne no fruit.  In furtherance of such pleasing enterprises, the US has been neglecting the most fundamental principle of leadership: impartiality-based justice.  While, in her attempted exertions to win-over India, the US created India-specific exclusion clauses, designed India-oriented statutory exemption regimes and supplied innumerable tech-war gizmos to New Delhi; it also started help in creating an anti-Pakistan cloud to satiate Indian desire of Pakistan bashing.  In pursuance of the latter, the US compromised its natural and historic capacity and sense of balance and righteousness.  It neglected its fundamental responsibility of being fair and responsible.  Whether it is treatment towards cross-border terrorism (claimed by both sides), response to nuclear programmes, denunciation of territorial violations, or maltreatment of minorities, the US is transforming into a committed defender of Indian excesses in all her domestic, regional and international violations.  Unfortunately, the US ‘proverbially’ appears to be ‘in Indian pocket’.  

The most recent episode, where the ‘senior’ US President Mr Biden has jabbed at Pakistan’s ‘nuclear weapons and the country (being) without any cohesion’, itself appears to be awfully incohesive.  While it is an outright reality that whatever a US President utters, becomes a policy guideline, but in this case, if one seriously scrolls through the entire text of presidential address, one does not fail to notice the awkward repetitions, fragmented references and shockingly disconnected thoughts.  While Mr Biden has had his share of elderly falls and illnesses, it appears that over-work or excessive burden of responsibilities, like reinvigorating the lost image of the US within her allies, resuscitating the receding economy, reviving the US global leadership image and re-commitment to Sino-US and US-Russia contestation scenarios has genuinely taken a toll on his judgement, cohesion and health.  It, therefore, shall be an act of sincerity, loyalty and devotion to the state, the democracy and the entire nation that all statements and declarations from the high office be issued after due deliberations and consultations on factuality and appropriateness.  It is time that the US regains her lost leadership in morality, values and fairness in global order.  While ‘speak softly and carry big stick’ can be an erstwhile promising strategy but speaking from moral high ground with legal correctness carries its own weight in an eternal international arena.

Air Vice Marshal Faheem Ullah Malik (Retd) is a Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan dealing with Warfare & Aerospace. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »