Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles - Maheen - Article thematic Image - Dec copy 2

The use of drones for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) has become a routine of militaries worldwide. However, with the intensifying threat levels and emerging technologies, militaries are resorting to combat drones, also known as Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs). UCAVs are drones that operate with assistance from the ground system and can function autonomously or semi-autonomously. In addition to carrying out ISR, UCAVs can conduct complex battle missions.

UCAVs can carry a diverse payload of weapons, such as guided bombs and air-to-ground missiles. They are equipped with advanced technologies, for example, a Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), synthetic aperture radar (SAR), intelligent communication and tracking systems, identification of friend and foe (IFF) system, laser designator, laser finder and so on. UCAVs have extended range, an endurance period of up to 40 hours and can reach a maximum altitude of 50,000 feet. Such capabilities would significantly enhance the operational competence of not only air forces but also the army, naval, space and cyber forces by giving them diverse response and engagement tactics.

Future UCAVs are expected to be equipped with multiple payloads and warheads. They would have an onboard processing unit fitted with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms capable of processing real-time information within milliseconds. These systems would have early warning and response capabilities with which they would be able to identify and neutralise an incoming threat. Future UCAVs would also be able to develop a 5D position of threats and will be equipped with air-to-air missiles. It is also expected that future UCAVs will be able to operate in space and have beyond visual line of sight.

Although these developments will significantly revolutionise warfighting, UCAVs will not replace pilots as they are not yet capable of performing functions that pilots are trained to perform. It might take decades before technology has reached a super-level to replace humans. Nevertheless, UCAVs have commenced an era of unmanned and irregular warfare and states are getting on-board with the idea.

The UCAVs (or combat drones) era began when the United States (US) conducted a drone strike in Afghanistan in 2001. The role of UCAVs has not reduced since. The present-day conventional warfare, such as Armenia and Azerbaijan’s dispute over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, saw extensive use of UCAVs. Azerbaijan’s deployment of UCAVs was pivotal to its operational success.

Similarly, UCAVs were used in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The Russian forces have used Iranian-made Shahed-136 drones that fly low in swarms and are hard to detect on radars. Ukraine has depended on Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 to attack Russian military bases.

Turkey has emerged as one of the leading countries in designing, developing and exporting UCAVs. The Bayraktar and Bayraktar TB2 are the most famous UCAVs. Bayraktar TB3 is also in the works and it is expected that it will be able to carry and launch other munition drones. It is also reported that by 2023, Turkey will test a version of UCAVs reaching the speed of Mach 0.7. A Turkish firm has also unveiled UCAVs equipped with various warheads.

The US has indigenously designed and developed UCAVs, including RQ-11 Raven, Wasp-III, RQ-20 Puma, RQ-16, MQ-1C Grey Eagle, MQ-9 Reaper, RQ-7 Shadow, RQ-4 Global Hawk, Switchblade, and XQ-58 Valkyrie. Similarly, China has also developed Sharp Sword, a stealth UCAV. Its arsenal has several other armed drones, such as CH-3, CH-4 and Wing Loong I and II.

India tested its first indigenously produced UCAV Rustom II in 2016. It is a medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) combat drone designed to carry up to 350 kg payload. The payloads are Israeli-sourced and consist of electro-optic and infrared sensors, electronic intelligence (ELINT), and communication intelligence (COMINT). It is reported that Rustom II would be able to carry the anti-tank missile HELINA. Besides this, India purchased 50 Heron drones from Israel in 2019. Indian Navy has a US-made MQ-9B drone for surveillance in the Indian Ocean, while the Indian Air Force operates more than 150 Israeli-made Harop drones and the Indian Army has Harpy, an Israeli-made ‘fire-and-forget’ drone with high hit accuracy.

Pakistan successfully conducted a drone strike during a military operation in 2015 using the first indigenously designed and built combat drone, Burraq. In addition to ISR, Burraq can carry out surface target engagement and is equipped with Barq, an air-to-surface laser-guided missile similar to American Hellfire, and guided drop bombs. In 2021, Pakistan manufactured Shahpar II, equipped with laser-guided missiles. Shahpar II features robust autopilot, comprehensive mission planning and management software suite and reliable data communication links. Pakistan also possesses American Arrow and Scan Eagle, German LUNA, Italian Falco, Chinese Wing Loong I and II and indigenously developed Uqab.

Recent employment of UCAVs in conflicts in Europe, for instance, Azerbaijan versus Armenia and Ukraine-Russia war, have demonstrated that the employment of UCAVs would make future wars more lethal and intense as the technology matures. Due to this, UCAVs would become an attractive option compared to traditional manned platforms and this trend is likely to grow in future wars.

Maheen Shafeeq is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She holds a Master’s Degree in International Relations from the University of Sheffield, UK. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »