17

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has impacted the decision-making and political processes around the world. However, international pressure has been left wanting on many emergent political and human rights crises, such as that brewing in Occupied Kashmir. The international community has been unable to restrain India from pursuing dangerously hawkish policies, including a recklessly aggressive posture towards Pakistan. The Indian strategy is guised in several tactics which are being employed to attain its nefarious vested interests.

The Modi regime maintains an unrelenting appetite for escalating tensions with Pakistan to detract attention from domestic criticisms for gross mismanagement.. The Hindutva-inspired regime is in no mood to terminate the deadlock that exists between India and Pakistan following 27th February 2019 skirmish, rather it is more emboldened to capitalize on the ongoing pandemic to somehow strike at Pakistan.

The strategy employed against Pakistan is a multifaceted, hybrid scheme: not only limited to direct confrontations but also to impair Pakistan economically, diplomatically and exploit the fault lines existing within the state.

Pakistan’s economy is a vital domain, the instability of which provides India a definite leverage. India’s efforts to get Pakistan blacklisted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) are ongoing, seeking to deprive Pakistan from any sort of economic assistance from the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European Union etc.

It also aims to jeopardize the ongoing, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) by impairing the security environment of Baluchistan. The ongoing month has witnessed two attacks on the Pakistani security forces in Baluchistan.

The diplomatic front is another area which India is aiming to exploit against Pakistan. India has always endeavored to isolate Pakistan diplomatically by portraying it as the terrorism-sponsoring state. These endeavors are intact despite the pandemic.

On one hand, India is shaping its image as a state, devoted to the fight against the pandemic by providing healthcare facilities to other states; at the same time it is insinuating as if Pakistan is inclined to deliberately spread the virus across the border, recently suggested by General Bipin Rawat.

The dissatisfaction of a community towards government policies can emerge in any country noting that historical, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic divisions exist everywhere. However, such movements are only able to operate optimally when there is involvement of external actors who provide resources and streamline the efforts of such groups. Consequently, India aims to divide us internally, by constantly deepening the divisions and precipitating artificial conflicts. India has been investing in Baluchistan and groups such as Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) to widening the faultlines within Pakistan.

The strategy that India has employed is gradually unfolding before us, in the form of the recent events. The ongoing year has witnessed repeated unprovoked firing at the Line of Control (LOC) by the Indian forces, even the onset of the pandemic could not restrain India from cease-fire violations which occurred repeatedly throughout May. The Indian side tries to inject the narrative that the firing is initiated from the Pakistani side to send in terrorists.

Likewise, the media has been reporting clashes between Indian security forces and militants in Kashmir. On 2nd May, a Colonel and a Major were among five Security Force (SF) personnel killed in an encounter at the Chanjmulla in Handwara area in Kupwara District of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). This was followed shortly by another attack in which three paramilitary Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel were killed in the same area.

This attack served as the pretext to start spreading hatred against Pakistan, alleging that the militants were supported by Pakistan. Consequently, unprovoked ceasefire violations by the Indian security forces were observed, later to be followed by aggressive statements by Indian politicians and military leadership.

The Indian Army Chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane stated that “unless Pakistan gives up its policy of state-sponsored terrorism, we will continue to respond appropriately and with precision”, alleging the Handwara attackers to be facilitated by Pakistan without any concrete proof.

Shortly afterwards, Indian ex-Army Chief V K Singh recently claimed that a plan is ready, and Army will take action when time comes, vis-à-vis Gilgit-Baltistan. In January this year, General M.M. Naravane gave a stern warning by stating “whenever government gives a go-ahead signal, Indian Army is ready to take away Pakistan occupied Kashmir”.

Likewise, high level meetings have also been convened recently. On 10th May National Security Adviser, Ajit Doval held the meeting with top commanders of Army and heads of other security agencies The meeting was attended by Indian Army Chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) Chief Samant Goel, Northern Army Commander Lt Gen YK Joshi, General Officer Commanding of the Army’s Srinagar-headquartered 15 Corps (GoC) Lt General BS Raju and the Nagrota-based 16 Corps Commander Lt Gen Harsha Gupta and Jammu and Kashmir Police DGP Dilbag Singh.

On May 8, News bulletins on state-owned broadcasters Doordarshan and All India Radio (AIR) started featuring weather forecasts for Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan, claiming them as Indian territories has intensified its brutal oppression in the valley and is oppressing the Kashmiri society on the pretext of killing militants. On 20th May, the n security forces burnt down 15 home in Srinagar after a heavy gun battle. The chronological order of the events rolling out, it can be inferred that the recent developments are not happening in isolation rather they form part of a pre-planned Indian strategy to weaken Pakistan and possibly carry out another misadventure. The rapid increase in military activities in Indian occupied Kashmir (IOK) coupled with violations across the line of control (LOC) suggest that a new plan may be brewing in the minds of Indian policymakers. In reality, it is the Indian state that is guilty of authorized terrorism against its minorities.

Though the probability of military confrontation between India and Pakistan remains debatable, the possibility of a low-intensity physical encounter between both states is not a far-fetched notion. Pakistan must remain ready and vigilant for a potential false flag operation from the Indian side to divert the attention of the international community from the Indian atrocities in the Indian occupied Kashmir (IOK) and to appease its domestic public, which is currently frustrated due to the mismanagement of the COVID-19 situation by the government.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in Daily NHT newspaper. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »