The Twitter Fiasco - Zuhaib - Article thematic Image - Dec

Twitter as a social media app has had its importance established for a long time, especially amongst the ‘informed’ and ‘tech-savvy’ audience. Started initially as a real-time information and news sharing micro-blogging platform, Twitter became a driver of social change in no time. Although it offered most off the basic features that other socialising platforms were offering, e.g., communicating with friends and sharing entertainment, music, sports etc.; but it was its power as an advocacy and community organisation tool that made it unique. Twitter activism left its mark as a driver of change in a multitude of social issues worldwide, ranging from individual problems to global politics.  Whether it was #BringBackOurGirls campaign helping Chibok girls of Nigeria or the alleged role that Twitter played in 2016 US Presidential election, all highlight its importance and influence in today’s globalised world.

Elon Musk’s takeover of the platform has brought many fundamental changes to the company; which in view of most experts, have proved to be more chaotic than constructive. Be it the massive layoffs of the workers or the blue tick controversy; the platform is witnessing a downfall. While most of the steps taken by Musk were aimed at getting the platform to generate optimum revenue, it has opened up a plethora of new problems related to political rights, human rights and freedom of speech etc. which appears to be most concerning in the long run.

Twitter worldwide was acting as an apparatus to influence social and political discourse with its 400 million people user base that also included renowned international personalities, politicians, activists, academicians, celebrities etc. Earlier, Twitter as a company was highly attentive to the need for content moderation realising the platform’s impact on the public. Nevertheless, Musk, upon his arrival, eliminated the entire human rights team of the company along with others like AI ethics and curation, citing its negative impacts on engagement and hence, ad revenue.  The act led serious apprehensions about the platform’s future digital role and the harm it would bring to the public space. Concerns were also highlighted in Geneva by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker TĂ¼rk, urging Musk to keep human rights central to his management. As Elon Musk is an ardent protagonist of free speech and boasted about making Twitter a free speech platform by ‘freeing the bird’, extremist users seem to have become emboldened to spread hate speech leading to online harassment, besides dis/misinformation. Different studies conducted by social media academics found that within hours following Musk’s takeover of the platform, the usage of the term ‘hate’ increased enormously – 4,778 times in just 12 hours to be precise. Earlier, the stats showed it to be around 84 times per hour.

Experts fear that Musk’s takeover of the platform is going to turn Twitter into a cesspool of negative information, with more chaos engulfing the platform than there already was. Repeated engagements of Elon Musk with high-profile right-wing figures to loosen restrictions on content, made headlines. Nevertheless, there was a positive aspect to this as well. During his discussions with civil society leaders on ‘how Twitter will continue to combat hate & harassment,’ it appeared that Mr Musk was taking a U-Turn.

With his fundamentalist approach, Musk has the ability to transform the platform positively in terms of content moderation. With his bold sci-fi approach to life that revolutionised the automobile and space industry, Twitter may have a similar future as well in terms of moderation and policing.

As the shock of Musk-Twitter fiasco impacted the world, it has had an impact on Pakistan’s Twitter space as well. For Pakistan, as a struggling democracy, the importance of Twitter is critical. The platform has extensively been used as a tool for narrative-building and campaigning in the country. With more than 3 million citizens as its users, the platform has been an effective source of information, manipulation and dialogue at the same time.  The medium is used by the country’s political elite to build followership in order to run their political and ideological campaigns and engage the wider audience. Due to this, Twitter has established its mark as a shaper of narratives, and politics remains the most talked about subject on the platform in the country.

On the other hand, Pakistani society has been suffering from religious, ethnic and linguistic divisions and many would argue that it has become further polarised because of the political rhetoric through Twitter. Given political sensitivities, divisive politics on the platform has aggravated the existing challenge of national integration. The newly unfolding fiasco at Twitter HQ, which portends weaker oversight and regulations, can make the space more toxic than it already is.

One hopes that Musk ‘disrupts’ this digital arena, i.e. Twitter, in a positive manner like he did in his other ventures. Nevertheless, if things go sideways, with Twitter turning into an unhealthy arena of hate speech, harassment and harmful information, then, authorities in Pakistan would need to play a role in developing a framework to regulate the domestic Twitter space to preserve national harmony, peace and state interests.

Zuhaib Anwar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »