the+space+of+the+world

Nick Couldry, The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can’t? (New Jersey: Polity Press, 2024).

Reviewed by Shafaq Zernab

Two to three decades ago, humanity committed an enormous mistake. We handed over the design of our social world to business, something we should have never done. Is it too early to rectify this mistake? Nick Couldry who is a professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory at the London School of Economics and Political Science, in his book, The Space of the World, asks the similar question. It is a captivating read and first of the trilogy, Humanising the Future, which suggests a different vision to create our digital spaces.

The book lies at the intersection of media theory, social theory, political philosophy, and contributes to the current discussion regarding the repercussions of social media on democracy, ethics and human solidarity. Positioning himself as a social theorist, Couldry compels us to ponder how social media has shaped the conduct of modern society and politics. Furthermore, the book invites us to envision a future beyond the current profit-seeking social media owned by a handful of Big Tech corporations. His vision of the future is a place where the social media is toxicity-free, that builds solidarity and promotes oneness of the human race.

Across seven chapters, Couldry argues that commercially developed social media platforms, have dominated the exact ‘space of the world’ on which humans socialise and carry out political activities. This digital space is becoming a major platform on which we build our relationships, communicate, debate ideas and organise politically. According to the author the acquisition of the space by Big Tech intentionally cripples our ability to unite and take collective action to ensure the survival of humanity, such as during climate disasters.

Couldry presents three main arguments regarding how these companies have remodelled the digital space and its impacts on our society. First, he posits that as compared to early 1990s when Internet was merely a tool of information sharing, the present-day social media curates the very circumstances under which people live and interact. To reinforce this fact, Couldry observes that the majority of us nowadays lead our lives ‘with social media, through social media, in social media,’ sharing everything from milestones to insignificant details. In short, social media has now become a place where we love, celebrate, grieve, repent, argue and live.

Secondly, Couldry argues that shared social space is warped, as the underlying rationale of Big Tech is user engagement and profit maximisation. This distortion of the social space as the author describes, results in a myriad of socio-political issues such as polarisation, mistrust and formation of attention economy which is weakening democracy and privileging a competitive impulse instead of cooperation, thus making it more difficult for people to accept and acknowledge what unites them. Such obliviousness toward common humanity puts us in jeopardy during climate disasters. Couldry presents multiple accounts from recent history to show how social media breed polarisation. From racist attacks against migrants in Europe to recent caste-base abuse in South East Asia and hate speech against minority Muslims in Myanmar, the author argues that social media has been at the centre stage of all these instances.

In the face of grave existentialist threats, what can be done to counter these tech giants and their impact on undermining humanity? Couldry calls for a radical shift in how Big Tech runs social media platforms in order to facilitate public discourse serving democracy rather than vested interest of few elite businesses.

However, the question is whether such a mammoth project is even feasible or not? With immense commercial potential and cut-throat competition among the Big Tech to capture attention of the users, the following questions come to mind: who will be the first to take moral step to redesign their existing social media platforms, giving up billions of dollars in profits? And what would be the viability and sustainability of such alternatives in the face of mainstream social media platforms that can invest millions to market its products and services?

Couldry reminds us that there are already a number of platforms that are non-profit, do not include advertisements, collect information about users or employ algorithms to make the content more absorbing. One such decentralised platform is Mastodon, where user experience is not dictated by Big Tech but driven by user’s own choice of content and interactions. For that, inherent cultural will of a society should be able to deny the commercially motivated platforms that we have become accustomed to and adopt a paradigmatic shift.

The Space of the World is a provocative work that enhances our understanding of digital spaces. It challenges us to think about what our nearly mindless consumption of social media implies and what a radically new landscape of social media might resemble and how it can be used to create collaboration and empathy. As a result, it is particularly suited for researchers and academics exploring the intersection of emerging technology, and the digital space with how it relates to human psychology. 2025 Gen Z revolts in Asia where the youth, fed up with alleged systemic corruption, turned to social media to overthrow their governments demonstrate the potential. However, the 6 January Storming of the US Capitol is the ultimate illustration of how one social media post from influential figures can trigger political polarisation and extremism.

On the whole, Couldry takes a negative view of social media, pointing at its negative aspects. Such a pessimistic view fails to acknowledge that social media has also been a force of good in the society, such as creating awareness about people living with disabilities, giving voices to marginalized groups of people, and enabling people to demand transparency and accountability in governance. Leaving that criticism aside, the book attempts to change the focus of the discussion from content moderation or dealing with misinformation on the digital platform to a complete redesign of the architecture of social interaction which makes it a new and valuable addition to the current body of literature.

The writer is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. She can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »