hunger

There is a paradox of hunger that pervades our society with respect to the consumption of food. On one hand, we are categorized among the hungriest and food-scarce on earth; and on the other, we let an even more astonishing amount of food go to waste.

According to the Global Hunger Index Rankings (2019), Pakistan now scores a frightening 94/117 countries, which means that its incidence of hunger is comparable to that of North Korea (92) and Ethiopia (97). In fact, South Asia as a whole displays some extremely worrying trends, because on the index Afghanistan (108) and India (102) actually fare even worse than we do.

India in particular sets a horrifying example because, instead of diverting the necessary resources to addressing regional hunger, it has become the largest arms importer in the world (12% of the entire world’s purchases), exemplifying the folly of violent choice in the axiomatic “guns vs. butter”.

The Global Hunger Index hinges on three factors: undernourishment, child-mortality, and undernutrition; and since coming to office, the current government has laid a strong emphasis on addressing these factors. In his first televised speech after assuming office, PM Imran Khan memorably held up diagrams of the stunted child’s brain to the screen, showing how important it was to divert the utmost attention to addressing child development and hunger in the country.

Some efforts were being made initially and were bearing fruit. For context, in 2017 Pakistan ranked 107th on the same Global Hunger Index. However, exogenous economic forces (such as brutal IMF-imposed austerity and its heightening inflationary pressures) and political forces (the illegal and violent annexation of Kashmir by New Delhi) have diverted considerable attention of the government away from addressing the scourge of hunger.

Yet hunger is not the government’s task alone, and the most troubling element of the paradox of hunger in Pakistan is in fact that the public recklessly wastes unfathomable amounts of food in such a hungry country. This grotesque aspect of the public’s character is revealed in the statistics that up to 40% of food in Pakistan is wasted (more than 36 million tons of food). Figuratively, this would be akin to seeing every man, woman, and child in every city of Pakistan grabbing their plate, walking outside, and throwing their food on the street at lunchtime.

Yet the question that this society must ask itself is: how can a country so food-deprived also be so wasteful in its dietary attitudes? The answer comes first and foremost from the ostentation of its public practices. Consider how those oily dongas are splurged at in weddings, or any in other social function for that matter. In addition, despite some notable yet small civil society initiatives (e.g. Thali in Pindi-Islamabad), there is no wide-scale initiative for managing food waste.

There are lessons to be drawn from countries such as Japan, where not only is hunger minimized and child & adult nutrition prioritized, but food waste is also being actively combatted at the governmental and civil society levels. Food wastage currently stands at an estimated 10% of Japan’s food consumption and is falling, even though there is a recognition that still more needs to be done.

Yet we mustn’t make the mistake of presuming that only rich countries can effectively combat hunger and food waste. Cuba, for example, is ranked 5th/117 on the Global Hunger Index, and one isn’t inclined to think of it as particularly rich. Uruguay ranks similarly high, and yet it too faces resource constraints. Yet in highlighting these two examples from the Americas, there may also be an opportune occasion to point out that the Global Hunger Index conveniently leaves out a ranking for the United States, as if the figure were too low!

This could be further from truth. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), in 2017, an estimated 15 million households were food insecure, and 40 million people struggled with hunger in the United States, while 45 million Americans rely on stipends from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to buy food each month. This is the paradox of hunger on an even more exaggerated and brutal scale than witnessed in Pakistan, given the incomparably large economic endowments of the continental US.

Regarding food waste in Pakistan, some steps have been taken towards cautioning the public against food waste. For example, the Punjab Food Authority (PFA) issued the Disposal of Excess Food Regulation 2019 guidelines in February, with a view to minimizing food wastage and focusing in particular on the excesses of hotels, restaurants, and banquets.

Although they are commendable, these guidelines will not be effective until the bourgeois (and especially nouveau-riche) attitudes that are increasingly manifested in the public sphere aren’t brought to heel. This requires soul-searching as much as a genuine collective commitment towards the austere consumption function exemplified by prophets in scripture. “And do not waste, for God does not love the wasteful,” [Quran 6:141].

Such attitudinal factors are a cornerstone against hunger among the top performers around the world. Even in Japan, the main driver of food waste management is not just government policy (although effective plans have been in motion since 2001), but the spirit of Itadakimasu – “I am grateful for that which I receive.”

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). He can be reached at [email protected]. This article was first published in Pakistan Observer and can be accessed at https://qoshe.com/pakistan-observer/dr-usman-w-chohan/the-paradox-of-hunger/56068213


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »