Shah Muhammad-Spa-Com-War-Oped thumbnail-Dec-2024-AP

Imagine being transported into a world where battle plans unfold in vibrant holograms, and strategy feels like second nature. Back in 2013, Ender’s Game dazzled audiences with its futuristic take on soldier training – using breathtaking holographic simulations to prepare for a fight against an unstoppable enemy. Fast forward to today, and we’re already stepping into a similar reality. Games like Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon let players dive into virtual battlefields, plotting moves and outmaneuvering enemies with augmented precision. What once seemed like pure science fiction is now shaping the tools of modern conflict and decision-making. This phenomenon of blending the physical and virtual world through an interactive interface is part of ‘spatial computing’ that allows machines to comprehend our physical environment – a combination of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies.

VR and AR are no longer just buzzwords; they’ve become essential tools in modern warfare. VR immerses soldiers entirely into alternative virtual environments, creating hyper-realistic scenarios for simulated training or mission planning. AR, on the other hand, enhances the real world by overlaying additional virtual layers – be it visual, acoustic, or haptic – on the physical environment, sharpening the sensory perception of soldiers, sailors, and pilots. In 2019, Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) trained for tunnel warfare against Hezbollah without physically being underground. The trainings were conducted through VR headsets that transported the soldiers to a simulated tunnel environment, and may have been instrumental vis-Ă¡-vis IDF’s mission planning for subsequent military operations against Hezbollah.

A prominent AR model is the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) with the Unoted States military. Launched in 2018 in collaboration with Microsoft, it is a USD 22 billion project that constructs an AR-driven synthetic display via high-tech goggles that upgrade a soldier’s sensory perception, target acquisition and target engagement. In 2024, Microsoft integrated AI into this system enabling it to autonomously detect threats and reinforce soldiers’ tactical superiority on the battlefield. This upgrade would also enable the goggles to receive data from other platforms such as drones and aircraft in real time, potentially reflecting the nexus of spatial computing, AI and the Internet of Things (IoT) on the battlefield.

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is also testing the Military Augmented Reality System (MARS) headset which is reportedly not as advanced as IVAS but it could become an integral feature in China’s high-tech military transformation. As showcased in trials, it elevates a soldier’s visibility, effectively allowing them to identify and engage targets from behind a cover. Thus, these AR-powered headsets could break the opacity of cover and substantially increase the lethality of warfare.

While the potential of VR and AR in modern warfare is undeniable, it’s important to acknowledge that systems like IVAS, MARS, or similar technologies have yet to see real-time deployment on an actual battlefield. This gap underscores the challenges that still need to be addressed. One major hurdle lies in the military applications of spatial computing, which are constrained by inherent limitations. For instance, the sheer volume of data streams these systems generate can overwhelm soldiers, leading to the risk of information and cognitive overload. This is likely the reason why IVAS users complained of side effects such as nausea and dizziness. Cognitive overload could eventually retard rather than enhance situational awareness in combat. Moreover, the data-intensive and AI-augmented nature of this technology raises legitimate apprehensions regarding cyber threats such as data breaches or jamming. For example, researchers at the University of Chicago were able to exploit security vulnerabilities in Meta’s Quest VR system. Similar threats prompted the US military to work with high-tech contractors to develop preventive measures for its devices. In a cyber-attack scenario, inaccurate or manipulated projection over the headset may not only jeopardise a soldier’s life but also operational success as a whole. Extreme climates, such as scorching heat or freezing cold, as well as connectivity challenges in remote or contested areas, could also notably hinder their functionality. These vulnerabilities raise critical concerns about the reliability and resilience of such systems when deployed in real-world battlefield conditions. Importantly, the exorbitant costs associated with these devices could limit adoption and militarisation of this technology. Evidently, two of the most sophisticated devices in this regard – Microsoft’s HoloLens 2 and Apple’s Vision Pro – cost around USD 3500 per unit. The US Military’s IVAS system uses HoloLens devices.

High-tech advancements hinge on overcoming complexities to maximise the utility of emerging technologies. To address cognitive overload, rigorous R&D and regular trials are essential. Machine learning (ML) can play a pivotal role by filtering massive data streams and prioritizing critical information in real-time. Moreover, ML-driven encryption and advanced security protocols are vital to safeguard devices from cyber threats, with indigenisation emerging as a key solution for long-term cybersecurity resilience. Equally important is the durability of VR/AR hardware. Developing headsets with weather-resistant, adaptive materials will be crucial for their reliability in extreme operational environments. Given the high costs associated with such technology, smaller militaries would consider small-scale pilot projects and embrace Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) to share expenses and accelerate innovation.

The fusion of physical and virtual domains in warfare is not without its challenges – ethical dilemmas like in-built biases, over-reliance on technology, and reliability concerns in extreme conditions remain significant hurdles. Yet, these obstacles pale in comparison to the transformative potential of spatial computing. Dominance in the virtual realm is poised to become as crucial to victory as strategy, organisational strength, and geopolitical positioning. The sooner this reality is embraced, the better prepared nations will be for the battles of tomorrow. What once was science fiction is rapidly becoming science fact – reshaping the very nature of conflict and power.

Shah Muhammad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) in Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. He can be reached at: [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »