istockphoto-686124162-612x612-1-482x274

At the time of Kabul’s fall in August 2021, it was already evident to some observers that the people of Afghanistan would face an imminent crisis without the wholehearted assistance of the international community. This was because the flimsy fiscal architecture that they inherited was premised on abject external dependency, with previous governments in Afghanistan relying almost exclusively on foreign transfers (amounting to 75% of public expenditures). Most of the gains from such a dependency remained concentrated in a puppet elite, which ultimately bolted for the door with bags of cash once defeat appeared imminent. With their complete capitulation, most of Afghanistan’s brain trust also fled abroad and left the masses stranded in a limbo that has persisted ever since.

In such circumstances, it was imperative for neighboring countries and international stakeholders to band together on a humanitarian basis to assist the Afghan people, even if they weren’t necessarily sympathetic to the new Taliban regime. However, a blanket set of sanctions was imposed on the new government, and $9 billion of assets parked in the US financial system which belonged to Afghanistan were frozen indefinitely. With a shortage of both human capital and financial capital, the new government appeared dead on arrival. In the meantime, the local financial system ground to a halt, hoarding became rampant, basic public services broke down, and poverty levels soared. In the four months since the Fall of Kabul, the economy has been in a tailspin and GDP has possibly shrunk by 40%, if not more.

It was in this dire context that Pakistan hosted an extraordinary summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which was met with widespread participation from countries even outside the OIC community. The collective effort galvanized many actors to make pledges, raise awareness, and advance a common cause. Concrete measures from the summit included the creation of a trust fund to deliver humanitarian disbursements, and the appointment of a special observer for the Afghanistan situation. The summit was hailed by officials around the world including the US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, despite his country’s sanctions regime against the current government. Beyond the OIC summit, the UN has also signaled plans to earmark $8 billion for emergency humanitarian assistance and social service provision.

The UN’s approach aims to go beyond emergency relief and towards the preservation of public administration structures, salvaging something of what was left by a 20-year occupation, particularly in the fields of public utilities and healthcare systems. Later on, the UN aims to initiate a fundraising drive of $4.4 billion, the largest ever attempted for any country, and comparable in size to Afghanistan’s total economic aid in 2020 (i.e. in the previous government’s tenure), with the intent of providing food, shelter and other essential equipment to preserve lives.

However, is one to infer that these initiatives offer true rays of hope for a country at the verge of implosion? It is estimated that nearly 60% of the population (or 24 million people) face acute hunger during this brutal winter, and up to 9 million Afghans are bracing for imminent famine. In the desolate conditions that the civilian population faces, rays of hope are a welcome augury, but they are only a first step towards the major reconstruction that is required in months ahead.

For example, the UN estimates that a further USD $3.6 billion will be required in 2022, just to keep basic functions such as schools and hospitals going at the bare minimum. Therefore, beyond the immediate threat of hunger, one must look at a longer horizon, and hope for a wider reconstruction which averts the most frighteningly engineered catastrophe of our time: Afghanistan’s slow-motion mass starvation.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director of Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.This article was first published in Pakistan Observer. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image Source: Immigration & Policy Resources for Afghanistan—CAIR Los Angeles.(n,d) from https://ca.cair.com/losangeles/campaign/help-afghanistan/


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »