13. Quaid's Quote- Dr Zia - Article thematic Image copy

75 years on, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s famous quote, “A country without a strong Air Force is at the mercy of any aggressor. Pakistan must build up her Air Force as quickly as possible. It must be an efficient Air Force, Second to None,” needs to be applied at number of other places. For instance, the economy. It may be appropriate to suggest that Quaid’s quote may be rephrased in today’s economic environment of Pakistan.

“A country without a strong economy is at the mercy of International Financial Institutions (IFIs). Pakistan must build up its economy which is growth-led, self-sustaining, and robust, so that its national security is not at risk and people do not have to worry about the livelihood and future of their children.”

At beginning of 2022, the people of Pakistan were celebrating the near departure of the Pandemic, and the prospects of economic growth of nearly six per cent for the second year running. Nearly all the major international credit rating agencies had upgraded the outlook to positive, and the exports earning complimented by foreign remittances was fast closing the gap of Current Account Deficit. Industrial growth, agricultural output, and service sector were beginning to bring smiles on the faces of farmers, factory workers, and the technical staff. Fuel and electricity prices had been capped until the end of the fiscal year and people were relatively comfortable. Inflation was a concern but stood at nearly 12 per cent, with the government promising to give more subsidies on food items in the coming months. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) was consistent and well ahead of its target of tax collection.

On the diplomatic front, Pakistan was making its mark and two consecutive Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) meetings were held in Islamabad within a space of one month, with China’s Foreign Minister as a special guest for the first time in OIC’s history. Pakistan’s effort in getting the United Nation’s approval of March 15 as the “International Day to Combat Islamophobia” was universally recognised.

Public welfare projects, like the Ehsas Poverty Alleviation Programme, were recognised as one of the best by numerous international organisations, which also pledged to provide financial support for the Programme for its viability and credible execution.

On the front of climatic change, “Ten Billion Tree Tsunami” on the pattern of an earlier “One Billion Tree Tsunami” in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, also received tremendous support from international organisations and were declared a model programme by a country facing serious climate change effects without contributing towards it.

Pakistan had been on the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) since 2018, however, the government made tremendous progress in meeting the required action points and the country was nearing to get itself removed from that list on merit.

While the government could not claim that “All is well,” things appeared on track with the prospects of further improvement once the Pandemic effects had totally disappeared. However, something unusual happened. A No Confidence Motion succeeded in the Parliament for the first time in Pakistan’s history and a well-performing government was removed from power in April 2022.

In my view, a renewed hybrid war was imposed on Pakistan, because the country was embracing geo-economics as the mainstay of its geopolitical considerations. The enemies of Pakistan would never want an economically independent nuclear state which has a Muslim population of nearly 97 per cent. Perhaps, this was one reason that Pakistan was once again put to the test with regards to unconditional support for extra-regional interests in the region, for which the country was not prepared.

Ever since the change of government in Pakistan, although through democratic means, the country is going through a period of extreme uncertainty particularly due to its flagging economy. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has put extra demands in return for much-needed financial support, which has put extra burden on the common man due to extraordinary inflation. Concurrently, major financial institutions have downgraded the country’s economic outlook to make it more difficult to attract foreign investments or foreign lending. Moreover, the adverse impact of climatic change has induced unprecedented rains and flash floods across at least 60 per cent of the landmass that has affected over 33 million people. The country is unable to cope with the situation and has appealed to international agencies for help and support. However, the response has been lukewarm till date as millions of people are forced to abandon their drowned homes, household, and livestock. There is growing fear of acute shortage of essential food items in the coming months not only in the affected areas but across the country due to destroyed crops, lack of land preparations for the next sowing, and supply chain disruptions.

Pakistan is once again going through a period of extreme adversity and needs to seriously consider its medium- to long-term national interests and develop consensus to build dams and water reservoirs to fight the impact of climate change because it is here to stay. Pakistan must understand the significance of economic security to reduce its dependence on IFIs and friendly nations in times of need. The leadership needs to apply our Quaid’s vision for the PAF to the country’s economy as well.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management between India and Pakistan’ and ‘South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace.’ He is presently working as Director (Peace and Conflict Studies) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be contacted at: [email protected]

Image Credit: Online Sources


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »