Shaza Arif-Four Battlegrounds-11 Dec 2024

Paul Scharre, Four Battlegrounds: Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (New York: WW Norton, 2023).

Reviewed Shaza Arif

Power has long been the central currency of international relations. The pursuit of power has pushed the world towards a perpetual technological race driven by cutting-edge innovations. In this context, it is important to view power dynamics through the lens of technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI). The book ‘Four Battlegrounds: Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’ is a recent take on the subject. The book has been authored by Paul Scharre, who is one of the most widely read authors on AI, particularly the impact of technology on different aspects of warfare.

In this expansive work, the author explores successive waves of digital innovation, from the explosion of data to the advent of IoT, autonomous technologies, and machine learning. Throughout the book, Scharre discusses the evolving dynamics positioning the United States and China as the principal centres of globalised innovation. He underscores four critical components from Data, Computing Power to Talent and Institutions, which also form the basis of the book’s title ‘Four Battlegrounds’. These are presented as foundational pillars of AI infrastructure, with Scharre arguing that strategic control over them will shape the future balance of power in AI. Notably, he places particular emphasis on the first two, data and computing power, as especially decisive in this contest.

Writing in a comprehensive and accessible style, Scharre unpacks the key phenomena, challenges, opportunities, and implications linked to AI integration. In fact, he argues that resisting AI will be futile. Instead, it is better to embrace it proactively but with caution and he leaves no stone unturned to convey his perspective with clarity and conviction.

Most importantly, the author addresses several prevailing myths surrounding AI integration. He engages with timely questions, for instance: Is more data truly decisive? Why is there such hype around facial recognition despite its limited applications? Has the AI arms race already begun, or is it still on the horizon? Each of these questions is tackled with well-reasoned analysis, robust justifications and empirical evidence. The most interesting section in the book is where the author contests the debate around the nature and character of war. The section provides thought-provoking ideas regarding how these age-old concepts need to be redefined – or perhaps seen through different perspectives. Equally compelling are the author’s insights into how AI is likely to mediate the future of warfare. Adopting this perspective, he challenges the often-oversimplified narratives surrounding AI’s military integration and instead highlights its deeper implications warfare’s cognitive and psychological dimensions.

Despite its considerable length, complex concepts are conveyed in clear and straightforward language, making the text approachable without compromising depth. Visual elements, such as graphs and pie charts, further add to one’s understanding by offering additional analytical insights. Scharre’s earlier work, ‘Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War’, was also a best-seller. It offered a holistic overview of how AI will impact the contours of warfare. ‘Four Battlegrounds’ reiterates those concerns with added evidence and projects future trends.

While the book offers valuable insights, it also shows some undercurrents of bias. Throughout, China is pinned as a repressive and assertive state that is exploring AI against its own people and becoming a global concern. The portrayal of Chinese-style surveillance systems in the book tends to be exaggerated and framed in overtly negative terms. While it is true that China employs extensive surveillance mechanisms, similar practices exist, albeit under regulatory frameworks, in many Western democracies. In the concluding chapters, Scharre acknowledges the deep interdependence of the US and Chinese AI ecosystems, noting that Chinese companies implicated in human rights violations may simultaneously receive indirect support through US military-funded research. These realities illustrate the blurred ethical boundaries surrounding AI development, a complexity that warrants a more balanced and critical examination, which remains somewhat underexplored in the book.

From a policymaking perspective, the book reinforces the call for the US government to remain vigilant regarding China’s strategic ambitions in the AI domain. The analysis reflects current developmental trajectories, suggesting that China’s AI ecosystem is rapidly maturing, positioning the state to challenge US leadership and assert itself as a global technological power. Recent breakthroughs, such as DeepSeek’s R1 model rivalling top US systems despite export restrictions, and Alibaba’s launch of the advanced Qwen-32B reasoning model, are indicative of the pace and ambition of China’s AI ascent. Lastly, given the complex nature of how the US and China are handling AI, it points out that regulating the technology will be a considerable challenge.

Although the success of ‘Army of None’is likely to remain intact and unparalleled, ‘Four Battlegrounds: Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’ is also a timely contribution especially on US-China technological competition. Technology enthusiasts, students of international relations, mid-career researchers, and policymakers alike should not be deterred by the book’s length. Its depth offers valuable insights for anyone seeking to better understand the strategic implications of AI and its optimal utilisation. Overall, the book is a worthwhile and rewarding read that justifies the time and effort it demands.

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »