Economics -Dr Shamsi - Article thematic Image

Pakistan is at 75 now, with a population of 220 million people growing at a rate of two per cent. The country has nuclear capability, alongside strong conventional armed forces to defend its territorial integrity and sovereignty. However, society has not grown with the age of the state in accordance with the vision of our founding father Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

Pakistan got independence from British India on August 14, 1947, as the largest Muslim state in the world. Jinnah defined the core values for the newly independent state as – Unity, Faith, and Discipline. Each of these values had a specific purpose and a message for the people of Pakistan. Unity was kept on top, primarily because Pakistan was ethnically diverse and needed to join hands to consolidate the new state. Faith was meant to remind the populace that this country had come into being as a result of the Two-Nation Theory with a specific purpose – a separate state for the Muslims of the subcontinent. Jinnah purposefully included Discipline among the core national values so that people work together for sustained development of the newly independent country which did not even have its due share of assets at the time of Partition. Jinnah knew that Pakistan could survive only if its people were united and disciplined and worked hard for its development right from the beginning.

Unfortunately, Jinnah did not live for long enough to put Pakistan on the path he had envisioned. Likewise, some other leaders who were with Jinnah during the struggle for independence also departed before they could see Pakistan growing to its true potential. However, in spite of great challenges in the domain of economy, security, immigrant settlement, and water distribution, Pakistan still did well in the initial years of its existence.

Coming back to the national core values, one might argue that these values are well known to the nation and the real issue lies in their implementation. Well, what I will argue is that values cannot be implemented by force. These are collectively adopted by the people when they are convinced about them. National values are reflective of a nation’s beliefs, practices, culture, and religious leanings. An individual cannot be forced to become patriotic or tolerant but may be motivated. When certain values are adopted by a nation, the government, media, civil society, and educational institutions need to inculcate those core values through concerted motivational campaigns. The people will also adopt any value only if they see the leadership and ruling elite also practising the same.

Let me give examples of Western nations. Life, liberty, democracy etc. are the most common values adopted and practised in the developed world. However, when any of these states tried to implement these by force in the developing countries, it did not work, because values cannot be exported. These are developed indigenously based on beliefs, norms, practices, and environmental evolution over a period of time.

Coming back to Pakistan, which is only 75 years old, it still has time to evolve as a cohesive society. The majority of the population is young, dynamic, emotional, and extremely industrious. However, it needs to be motivated, guided, and lead by example. While Unity, Faith, and Discipline would remain the cardinal principles for the nation, it is time we add a few more aspects to recover from the deteriorating state of our society.

The best way would be to look toward the fundamental teachings of Islam because 97 per cent of the population is Muslims. I would suggest that we adopt these golden principles of Islam as our national values: Tolerance, Equality, and Social Justice.

Over the decades, particularly since the first Afghan War in 1979, our society has been polarised due to the import of extreme ideas; both on religious grounds, as well as along political dimensions. Extremism has been very damaging to Pakistani society, and it is important that tolerance is inspired among our populace, particularly the youth.

Equality is desperately needed in Pakistani society due to the increasing gap between the rich and poor. Rising inequalities are fuelling frustration, uncertainty, and emotional imbalances among the people of Pakistan.

Without social justice, society cannot survive. Historically, nations were wiped out from the face of the earth where the ruling elite did not do justice to the marginalised and downtrodden and had different standards of law for the rich and the poor.

Non-adherence to the fundamental values that are professed and practised by all religions is one of the most pressing causes of societal degeneration in Pakistan. The defined national values must be inculcated in our people through personal examples, motivational campaigns on media, academic institutions, think tanks, civil society, and law enforcement, if required.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management between India and Pakistan’ and ‘South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace.’ He is presently working as Director (Peace and Conflict Studies) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be contacted at: [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »