Usman Haider-Ind-Hyp-Mis-Oped thumbnail-Dec-2024-AP

India’s hypersonic missile test in November has positioned it as the fourth country, after China, Russia, and the United States, to possess this critical technology. The test demonstrates that India’s missile manufacturing capabilities have progressed considerably. While the exact details about the actual performance of the missile are still unknown, the Indian media has continued to glorify the country’s efforts to indigenously design and build a hypersonic missile. Given India’s past hostile behaviour, notably the 2019 Balakot aggression, this new capability has the potential to affect prevailing regional stability.

As per its definition, a hypersonic missile, travels faster than Mach 5 while having the capability to manoeuvre during its flight. It comes in two configurations: hypersonic cruise missiles (HCMs) and hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs). Unlike ballistic missiles that travel through high altitudes on a parabolic trajectory, hypersonic projectiles fly at lower altitudes with greater maneuverability and agility. This enables them to evade mid-course defence interceptors and reduces detection time for terminal missile defences. Their depressed trajectory also makes them harder to detect using radars and space-based sensors, posing tracking challenges even for advanced systems like those of the US.

India’s ambitions to develop hypersonic weapons were first unveiled in 2007 by former Indian President Abdul Kalam. The following year, Indian scientists began work on hypersonic systems, initiating tests in a 0.5-meter wind tunnel in Bangalore to study model behaviour at speeds beyond Mach 5. In 2016, India successfully tested scramjet engine technology, marking a significant milestone. By 2020, the country established its first true hypersonic wind tunnel (HWT), capable of testing materials at speeds between Mach 5 and 12. That same year, a successful field test of a hypersonic cruise system powered by a scramjet engine provided critical data for developing a combat-ready hypersonic missile.

The missile’s operational range exceeds 1,500 km. Various media reports claimed it to be a long-range anti-ship missile. However, given its extended reach, the missile will be used for land-attack missions as well. In addition, the firing visual shows the projectile launching from a canister, a new trend associated with most of India’s frontline ground-launched missiles. This canisterisation feature allows the firing of a missile in seconds rather than minutes. Reportedly, the tested missile is able to perform manoeuvres at the terminal stage, a key trait associated with hypersonic projectiles.

The hypersonic speed of the missile reduces its flight time to the target, thus shrinking the available time for interception by the adversary. These missiles are particularly effective against time-sensitive targets like mobile missile launchers and can penetrate reinforced underground bunkers and storage sites with conventional warheads. Furthermore, in an anti-ship role, they enhance anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities by targeting enemy warships at extended ranges.

Introducing this new system is part of New Delhi’s broader strategy to bolster its conventional counter-force strike capability. It is a continuation of India’s objective of establishing a new Integrated Rocket Force (IRF) which will entail missile systems carrying only conventional warheads to avoid nuclear entanglement.

While there has been hype about the impact of hypersonic missiles in recent years, the fact remains that there exists a dearth of information about the true capabilities of these missiles presently available in the inventory of different countries. The term ‘hypersonic’ is also sometimes used misleadingly to include missiles which actually do not satisfy the academic definition. Russia, for instance, has claimed using hypersonic missiles against Ukraine which did have a significant impact but were also frequently intercepted. Moreover, the substantial problems associated with designing and manufacturing of a hypersonic projectile, including its metallurgy and engine efficiency, also impinge upon the actual capability of these missiles.

While the addition of a hypersonic missile to India’s arsenal expands its attack options, it does not fundamentally alter the regional threat matrix, especially since similar capabilities are possessed by neighbouring countries. However, maintaining balanced power dynamics requires ongoing enhancement of existing capabilities through a comprehensive approach. This includes the induction and indigenisation of hypersonic technology and the development of a highly skilled workforce to support its advancement.

Usman Haider is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »