11. Catastrophic Fllod -Sir Ashfaque - Article thematic Image copy 4

The timing of the most horrible floods in Pakistan’s history could not have been worse. While the country was still recovering from the economic conditions created by COVID-19, the Russia-Ukraine war resulted in global energy and food crises. If that was not enough, change of government in April this year led to unprecedented political crisis, which is continuing without any sign of settlement. Fake news and unverified information on social media are not only fuelling emotions but is also leading to divisions amongst the masses.

Out of 150 districts, the ongoing floods have severely affected 110 districts, with loss of more than 1100 precious lives, over 1.2 million cattle and destruction of over 7.5 million acres of standing crops such as cotton, rice, and vegetables etc. Houses, schools, and basic health units have been destroyed or inundated. Roads, bridges, railway tracks and telecommunication systems have sustained massive damage making immediate relief work in the affected areas difficult. These difficulties will further endanger health and safety of the stranded people as waterborne disease, malaria and hunger take their toll on the people and their livestock.

While the floods have destroyed existing cotton, rice crops and vegetables in the affected areas, wheat stored in the godowns (storage areas) has also been ruined. In addition to creating food shortage and price hike this year, the inability of sowing wheat in the flood affected areas in October / November, will create food shortages next year as well. This will affect the poor segments of society the most.

Despite knowing Pakistan was in the list of ten most affected countries, successive governments with the exception of ‘Billion Tree Tsunami’ failed to take steps to mitigate any disastrous situation arising out of climate change. The government failed to take notice of and act on the warning of extraordinary monsoon rains issued as early as April and Pakistan Meteorological Department’s warning regarding flood situation arising out of extraordinary rains in May this year. The Federal government remained engaged in political engineering / political crises management and did not focus on the oncoming floods. All federal and provincial departments also failed to even initiate any worthwhile actions. Unfortunately, no one took any steps even when deep into the crisis as late as mid-July, except NGOs. Had there been timely action by the government and related departments, loss of life and livestock would have been minimised, as was witnessed in some areas where the administration was proactive.

Unfortunately, even during this catastrophe, political rivalry continues at unprecedented scale. Court cases against opponents, denying space on electronic media for fund collection campaign, illegal instructions to banks, fake news and maligning opponents seem more important than supporting the ill-fated people of the flood devastated areas. These attempts are only increasing polarisation in society and fuelling anger in the masses, amply evident from videos circulating on social media, suggesting increasingly hostile attitude of citizens towards the political leadership. Many political leaders have faced embarrassing situations in their own constituencies.

There is a need to understand that the situation in the country is unprecedented and special in many ways. Special circumstances necessitate special decisions. While millions are suffering from the calamity, the leadership needs to rise above personal interests and egos to jointly support the masses or at least, avoid creating hurdles for others. The leadership, instead of wasting time on mainstream media for maligning others, should look after their respective ministries’ functioning. Both the mainstream media as well as media cells of political parties should also play their role in motivating people to support their brethren in need, rather than creating splits through building false narratives.

The government needs to initiate short- and long-term measures. The short-term measures should be aimed at provision of food, medicine, and shelter to the people of the flood affected areas. While planning should be started right away; after the flood water recedes, reconstruction of houses, schools, hospitals, and communication infrastructure should be started to rehabilitate 33 million people. Steps must be taken to ensure that the entire process remains transparent. While urgent steps are required to meet the wheat requirements, the government also needs to predict and plan to acquire wheat for the coming year as well. Since food and other supplies need to be transported to different areas, fuel prices must be adjusted to reduce transportation costs. Additionally, the in kind coming from the friendly countries must reach the affected and deserving people. High profile visits to the flood affected areas also need to be curtailed and those helicopters and transports should be employed for flood relief work. This will also help local administration to focus on the people instead of VVIP protocols.

The long-term measures should look into clearing rivers and other water channels of any encroachments, strengthening of protective bunds, construction of dams for water storage and extensive tree plantation. Tree cutting should be banned and violations should be punished severely. Any financial assistance received from the friendly countries must be judiciously used to meet both, the short-term as well as long-term requirements. 

Leadership at all levels needs to understand changing ground reality and come out of 20th Century mindset. Today, the public has become much more aware, thus, is less likely to be manipulated and hoodwinked. Social media has become an effective tool to distinguish facts from fiction. Narrative building or image improvement through photo sessions or media campaign etc. will not only prove counterproductive but will also further damage the reputation of those who rely on such tactics. If the leadership continues to use such tactics in the 21st Century, it will only invite the wrath of the people.

Air Marshal M Ashfaque Arain (Retd) is Advisor to Chief of the Air Staff on CASS Affairs and is also Director of the Emerging Technologies programme at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be contacted at: [email protected]

Image Credit: Online Sources


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »