9. Zahra Niazi-Cho-Rem-Ove-Oped thumbnail-February-2026-APP

In 2025, according to governmental data, around 32,000 highly-skilled and highly-qualified Pakistanis registered for employment abroad, equivalent to roughly six per cent of the country’s half a million annual graduates. This number, too, represents only a part of the exodus of Pakistan’s advanced human capital nurtured in the country and now being absorbed into foreign economies. It excludes thousands of other highly qualified and skilled emigrants who attain a job abroad after completing higher studies there, secure employment through private channels, or start businesses overseas.

Advanced human capital outflows from Pakistan have risen sharply in recent years, driven by an increasing convergence between domestic push factors and the rising global demand for talent. Between 2021 and 2025, the number of emigrants in the ‘highly-qualified’ and ‘highly-skilled’ categories registering for employment abroad was about a hundred per cent higher than during 2011 to 2015. By contrast, the combined total of highly-skilled and highly-qualified emigrants in the 2011-15 period was lower than in the corresponding period a decade earlier, reflecting a visible shift in trend over time.

Pakistan has long pursued labour migration as a state-supported policy, with its antecedents dating back to the 1970s, when the Middle Eastern oil boom prompted the government to establish policies and structures to streamline and incentivise migration. Within a decade, the number of annual emigrants increased more than thirtyfold, including predominantly the mid-skilled and unskilled segments of the labour force. While the choice to migrate, driven by economic necessities, may have come with difficult trade-offs for many migrants, for the government, the immediate outcome was a win-win, easing labour market pressures while generating a stream of foreign exchange inflows. From USD 0.14 billion in FY 1972-73, worker remittances rose to USD 1.4 billion by FY 1978-79.

With these attractive dividends, the policies in favour of streamlining migration adopted a self-sustaining character, continuing to improve in successive decades under different regimes. These policies went beyond just facilitating the migrants to also supporting their families back in their home countries, reflecting the extent of the government’s commitment to labour export. For instance, families of individuals who had emigrated on valid and protected work visas after 23 March 1979 through the governmental migration authorities or those voluntarily registered with the Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (OPF) are eligible for a wide range of benefits, from access to dedicated housing schemes to education scholarships for children.

For decades, this policy approach was presented as intended to facilitate the migration of lower-skilled workers as part of the state’s social contract with its citizens. Yet, even as the outflow of advanced human capital has increased, the state’s muted response to it indicates that dependency on remittances has taken precedence over concerns about brain drain. In other words, it reflects an economy increasingly choosing short-term capital relief over long-term growth.

If empirical findings are any guide, remittances and other contributions by highly skilled and qualified migrants, such as knowledge transfers or policy advising, cannot compensate for the losses resulting from their migration abroad. With brain drain, the economy loses not just the tax-funded investment spent on developing this human capital but also a future taxable base, a significant proportion of its innovation and entrepreneurial potential, and its long-term growth capacity. What’s more, remittances may also decline with an increase in migrants’ level of education, as a large proportion of such individuals tend to come from relatively wealthier households or are more likely to take their families along and settle abroad permanently.

However, even if one were to assume that these inflows are still large enough, remittances ought to be celebrated only insofar as they act as complements to development rather than as substitutes for economic reforms. In recent years, an increase in the number of Pakistani emigrants abroad, diversification of destination countries, government initiatives to reduce the transaction costs of transferring money, and an increasingly transnational character of migrants have tilted the debate on remittances’ sustainability in favour of the optimists. In practice, too, these years have shown that remittances have become an increasingly dependable source of foreign exchange inflows for Pakistan. In FY 2025-26, these are expected to surpass the USD 40 billion mark, higher than even the country’s projected export value for the next fiscal year.

Yet, this dependability has also reinforced reliance on these inflows, placing the policy urgency for reforms to expand exports and investment on a back burner. The result is an economy that remains markedly below its potential, lacking resilience to shocks. Closely connected, most remittances in Pakistan are consumed instead of being invested, promoting consumption-led growth, which is exposed to any external shock that exerts a downward pressure on the purchasing power of households.

An overhaul of the current economic model – transitioning from a stability-oriented to a growth-and-stability-oriented approach – is no longer a matter of choice but rather a matter of urgency. The longer it is relied upon, the more entrenched it risks becoming. In today’s globalised world, migratory outflows will continue, taking their natural course, and remittances will flow in, but the challenge emerges the moment remittances begin being treated as the economy’s lifeline and human capital as a commodity. Only when the economy is broken free from this model can the state pursue structural reforms in earnest and create incentives to retain its young and productive human potential, boosting growth, enhancing resilience, and expanding the economy’s capacity to absorb the labour force at home. Attracting and retaining the young potential requires not just ad hoc measures but a coherent national strategy that advances fairness and transparency in the labour market, funds innovation, and rewards return migration.

The writer is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. The article was first published in Profit. She can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »