18. Saba Abbasi-Chivalry as Doctrine-Oped thumbnail-February-2026-APP

Operation Swift Retort was the first time in decades since 1971 that the air forces of India and Pakistan were pitched against one another. It’s been seven years since the incident, but the memory of a captured Indian fighter pilot sipping tea on national television remains vivid to this day. While the operational details are seldom discussed, the highlight of Operation Swift Retort remains the capture of Wg Cdr Abhinandan Varthaman, an ill-fated Indian Air Force (IAF) pilot, whose MiG-21 was shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF).

After merely four days in captivity, on 1 March 2019, Abhinandan was handed over to Indian authorities at the Wagah border. It is worth recalling that the custodial conduct that he received during his internment symbolised PAF’s chivalry and benevolence, as he was extended due respect as a member of the fighter pilot fraternity and treated as per Geneva conventions. Despite him being an active combatant of an arch-rival’s air force, Pakistani forces demonstrated elevated ethical conduct and adhered to dignified restraint.

However, instead of acknowledging the respect and kindness shown to their pilot, the Indian media, at the behest of their leadership, portrayed the episode according to their typical narrative. By making baseless claims such as Abhinandan being returned only due to the fear of an imminent Indian attack, or Pakistani forces having mentally harassed the Indian pilot in captivity, the Indian media attempted to distort the true facts. In the released video, in which Abhinandan leisurely praised the tea while sipping it, he did not depict the demeanour of someone who was subjected to harassment.

Wg Cdr Abhinandan was not the first pilot captured and then treated with grace and dignity by the PAF. During the Kargil war in 1999, Pakistan forces captured a MiG-27 pilot, Kampampati Nachiketa, who ejected after being shot down by Pakistan’s Man-Portable Air-Defense System (MANPAD). According to the Indian narrative, the pilot was badly beaten up before being handed over to the Red Cross owing to ‘diplomatic pressure.’ The reality of the matter was, in the words of renowned PAF writer Air Cdre Kaiser Tufail, who took Nachiketa’s interview, that he was treated with dignity and in accordance with the International conventions that the Pakistan armed forces strictly abide by.

Air Cdre Tufail also wrote that the IAF pilot went on to answer his queries ‘as if he was sitting in a crew room gossiping with a fellow pilot.’ However, Indian media outlets did not spare the renowned author, dragging him into their propaganda by making false claims about his whereabouts at the time of the crash and labelling his interview with Nachiketa as ‘interrogation.’ Indian social and press media made false allegations about Nachiketa being subjected to physical torture but intentionally skipped mentioning the cakes that Nachiketa received from the PAF personnel for his 27th birthday, which fell during his captivity.

The benevolence of the PAF fighter has not been limited to Indian pilots only. In 1988, a Pakistani F-16 shot down an SU-25, and its Russian pilot was taken as a prisoner of war. The pilot, Rudskoi Alexander, who was also the inspector of SU-25s deployed in Afghanistan, was eventually handed over to the Russian authorities in the span of a few days. However, unlike in India, the Russian media did not exhibit the tendency to present facts in a skewed fashion, and the matter was reported in its true perspective, without any false propaganda. Interestingly, the captured Russian pilot rose to the position of vice president of Russia in 1991.

Another manifestation of PAF’s chivalry is Gnat no. 1083 which ignominiously landed in Pasrur airfield during the 1965 war and is presently displayed at PAF museum, Karachi. The IAF Gnat pilot, Sqn Ldr Brij Pal Singh Sikand, upon his encounter with the PAF’s F-104 promptly lowered his undercarriage in surrender and landed the aircraft intact. The pretext he used for landing was having his radar and compass lost and his cannons jammed. However, on later inspection it was revealed that the guns and equipment of the Gnat worked perfectly, and it was the intimidation of PAF that caused the IAF pilot to land hastily. As is customary, the PAF treated the fear stricken prisoner of war pilot graciously, even though he was dismissed by the IAF while in captivity in Pakistan.

It is clear from the past instances that the PAF embodies the moral codes of chivalry and honour. It has historically followed an unspoken code of professional integrity in which demonstrating dignity for pilots in custody is deemed as a voluntary obligation. The etiquette of combat, exhibiting courage, is just as important for PAF as having courtesy and respect for the pilot from the fraternity. The seventh anniversary of Operation Swift Retort revives memories of not only PAF’s tactical brilliance and strategic restraint, but also its chivalry, decorum, and propriety.  This incident underscores that sparing defenceless enemies and treating them with grace are the foundational aspects of the institution.

Saba Abbasi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The Article was first published by Daily Times. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »