Afganistan

Till the end of 2021, Afghanistan loomed large in the international arena. The world was concerned about the deteriorating situation in the country post- United States withdrawal. Global media reported regularly about the on-ground changing situation, directives issued by the Taliban regime, the day-to-day struggle of Afghan refugees, increasing food scarcity and effects of economic sanctions imposed by the Western world, led by the United States. Global attention has since diverted to the Russia-Ukraine war. While the Ukraine crisis has overshadowed Afghanistan in the news, the Afghan population is still facing acute food shortage, a crumbling economy, bleak law and order situation and rising unemployment.

Amidst the entire quagmire of adversities, the major problem faced by Afghans is food shortage. The food supply situation in Afghanistan is worsening with each passing day, which is partially because of the drought and partially due to the political and economic turmoil. When Taliban took over Kabul in August 2021, the food storage situation in the country was already bad. Now, two-third of the provinces are having drought due to lack of rainfall which has severely impacted the country’s wheat production. The Taliban regime is unable to engage international donors because of imposed sanctions, frozen assets by the US and European Union, and lack of recognition of the incumbent government by the world at large. The US has been at the forefront of the measures taken against the Taliban regime and views them as illegitimate and has, thus, imposed sanctions, denying them access to the country’s assets and cash reserves abroad. This has led to the inability of the Afghan government to regulate the currency or pay its employees resulting in a crumbling economy, collapse of social order and an increase in corrupt practices.

According to estimates, during the last winter season, around 22.8 million people faced a ‘high level of acute food insecurity’ – which is around 55 percent of the total population of Afghanistan. Considering the deteriorating humanitarian situation, Taliban officials and diplomats from Western countries held two rounds of talks in Norway and Qatar in January and February this year, respectively. Just as some progress was in sight and it was felt that the Afghan population may get much-needed relief, Russia invaded Ukraine. The US government and other Western powers shifted their attention towards the Ukraine crisis, and the people of Afghanistan mired in a severe food crisis, were completely forgotten.

The Ukraine crisis has further complicated the food situation in Afghanistan. The country is currently almost completely reliant on wheat imports due to the droughts and economic turmoil. On the other hand, the two major food producers of the world – Russia and Ukraine are involved in a war resulting in food price inflation by 22 percent. This situation has made it more difficult for the Afghan government to procure food commodities. As a cumulative result of famine, drought, economic crises spurred by the US and the war between Russia and Ukraine, the Afghan people are going to suffer even more through this year and the next.

While the international community is not bothered by the growing humanitarian crises in Afghanistan, Pakistan has stood by its Afghan brethren. Whether it’s the recent earthquake that killed more than 1000+ Afghans or the pandemic, Pakistan has provided substantial aid to Afghanistan despite its own financial difficulties. Beside this, Pakistan has consistently been  lobbying internationally for the people of Afghanistan and calling on the international community to come forward and help the Afghan people.

While the media has a short-term memory, the global community should not forget that the Afghans are suffering and if not heeded to, the situation would deteriorate to catastrophic proportions in the coming days. It is, therefore, of extreme importance that arrangements are made for the flow of desperately needed aid to help lessen the miseries of the people of Afghanistan.

The writer is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image Credit: Online Sources


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »