US NSS -Ajwa Hijazi- Article thematic Image - Dec copy 2

The United States’ new National Security Strategy (NSS) was published by the White House on 12 October 2022. The document encapsulates the two-pronged global challenge for the US – advent of competition between the major powers to navigate the international order and the burden of shared challenges that are transnational. The NSS 2022 outlines the trajectory of global engagement that the USA would follow in the coming decade. Therefore, it depicts the policy matrix of the country towards the regions and states that are important in its realm of foreign policy approach.

The 48-page document does not mention Pakistan. But the US policy about other states, especially those bordering Pakistan, would significantly impact the country. Pakistan has found itself in a situation where the US has indicated prospects of an inflexible policy towards three of its neighbours – China, Afghanistan, and Iran, and an intimate regime of cooperation with the fourth one, India. Moreover, while exclusively designating two chapters to them, the US has termed the ‘out-competing of China’ and ‘containment of Russia’ as its top priority.

For Pakistan, four policy implications can be derived from the new NSS, which will impact its future course of policy formation towards the region.

In the context of the USA’s growing entanglement with China and accelerated inclination towards India, Pakistan- the principal partner in the Belt and Road initiative (BRI) – would be facing the heat. To maintain its growing strategic comfort with the US, India is likely to cause more disruption in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The NSS reiterates US’ focus on a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ while combating rising China by posturing India against it. Consequently, it also reflects Pakistan’s diminishing geoeconomic and geopolitical importance in the eyes of Washington.

Another salient point in the NSS is regarding Iran. The US criticised Iran’s nuclear programme and its alleged policy of interference in Middle Eastern countries. Amidst the growing tensions between the US and Iran, there has been slow progress on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Additionally, Iran shares a southwestern border with Pakistan. Hence, the manifestation of any aggressive mode of action by the US towards Iran would pose challenges for Pakistan in the form of another unstable neighbouring country.

The US left Kabul in August 2021 after fighting its longest-ever war, spanning over two decades. Since the withdrawal, the US has increasingly tried to maintain an ‘over-the-horizon’ policy which refers to the continuation of air strikes and drone attacks in Afghanistan. In this new NSS, without mentioning Pakistan, it has been hinted that the US would ensure that Afghanistan does not relapse towards terrorism. For this end, the US cannot ignore Pakistan’s geostrategic importance to counter the stream of threats emanating from Afghanistan. In addition to that, US policy is likely to have a wide array of impacts due to the geographical and historical dynamics between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Hence, devising any Afghan strategy, without taking Islamabad on board, would be short-sighted.

Pakistan is not a direct stakeholder in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. However, in an inter-connected world, countries, even miles apart, cannot remain unfazed by significant international events. According to NSS-2022, the US aims to constrain the growing Russian ‘threat to the international system’. In light of this, the probability of any future restraint from the Biden Administration towards Russia is likely to diminish. Resultantly, the ongoing turmoil in Europe would increase. The impact of the energy crisis and mayhem in the international supply chains would also have consequences for Pakistan, like the rest of the world. Besides, for Pakistan, steering its role between the two impulsive superpowers would be a foreign policy challenge requiring clarity and diplomatic acumen by policymakers.

Not mentioning Pakistan in its 2022 Security Strategy may be part of Washington’s strategic shift regarding the region, but it cannot lessen Pakistan’s pivotal regional significance. Furthermore, the absence of any explicit agenda of demands creates an opportunity for both countries to move on a path of bilateral relations which is not overwhelmed with any prior set of expected compliances.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »