Ayesha Shaikh-OA Cover-BONSAI CAPTIAL-Jan 28 2026

There was a time when, during the extension Margalla Road in Islamabad had bend to go around old trees. However, the city that was once known for its ability to conserve greenery and blooms every season is now under the spell of massive tree-massacre and bonsai plantations. The year 2025 brought along hailstorms and cloud bursts for the calm and scenic city of Islamabad. These extreme weather events are nature’s way of manifesting its discontent towards the disruptive practices of tree-slaughter and dwarfed cultivation in the region. The phenomenon indicates governance inadequacies, and nature is not the only one discontent with it. The traditional patterns of plantation need a tech-based supervision and adequate legislative oversight to escape the adverse effects of Bonsai Urbanism.

Episodic tree-slaughter in Islamabad in the name of urbanism and allergy-prevention attracted severe criticism from society. Authorities decided to erase trees to eliminate pollen allergy, at the expense of reducing the oxygen supply to the citizens. In the face of growing public discontent, the hasty tree-plantation drives were arranged, without catering to the seasonal implications reflecting poor ecological sense. Furthermore, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) also issued directives to prohibit further tree slaughter, but only under mounting pressure of condemnation. Nevertheless, the reactionary model is not a solution to deal with the uncertainty revolving around the growing threat of climate change.

The recurrent plantation schemes, such as ‘Spring Tree Plantation Drive 2025’ or the ‘Aik Beti Aik Shajar’ drive, indicate a mere greenwashing of the climate-insensitive approach. Climate activists from Islamabad expressed concerns about the management of resources allocated for such plantation drives. The nurseries designated to provide plants for such plantation drives deny access, claiming that they do not have suitable species or sizes of plants and instead offer expensive hybrid non-native varieties. Experts further added that the authorities prioritise infrastructural and development plans over the conservation of greenery or promotion of plantation drives, as evident in the recurrent construction schemes along over Islamabad. On 13th January 2026, World Wildlife-Pakistan also issued a statement declaring that the annual tree purge in Islamabad is driven by infrastructural plans and not by the intent to eliminate allergies, as claimed. Even though a few immediate measures have been taken to address the controversy, the state still lacks sufficient legislative instruments, sanction mechanisms, and expert oversight to regulate elimination of old trees and the plantation of new ones.

In addition to the tree-erasure, bonsai and hybrid plants have emerged as a new trend in the capital and around new development schemes.  While seeming to enhance the ornamental value of landscape, bonsais offer less, cost much more, and are maintenance-intensive as compared to regular native plants. On the other hand, they do not serve as carbon sinks, soil anchors, and environmental regulators like traditional plants do. The green canopy offered by decades-old Pepal, Banyan, Sukh-chain, Kikar, Bukain, and Sheshum trees during the hot summer afternoons cannot be replaced by the shrub-sized green appearance of a hybrid variety.

Another variant of the ornamental plantation is the extensive shift towards Palm trees. While Palm trees offer an elevated aesthetic appeal, significant to the deluxe development models of Gulf states, they are not suitable for the climate of Islamabad. Palms are accustomed to the hot, dry terrains and tropical coastal areas. In topographies such as Islamabad, they offer less in terms of climate regulation and require more care due to dry winters and less humid summers. The impact is visible through the difference in the Air Quality of sectors susceptible to the bonsai trend. While the impacts are starkly visible in the capital, the trend is not limited to Islamabad alone but spreads to all large cities.

The rows of bonsai trees and hybrid greenery along the Murree Road grab attention as one travels towards Rawalpindi.  Furthermore, the emerging housing societies proximal to the inter-city motorway (M-3) all the way to Chakri are another disastrous move. Acres of green arid land have been exploited for urbanisation away from the core urban hubs. One wonders as to why these societies cannot be forced to ensure plantation during construction phases and use tree transplants to shift grown trees.

Overall, this disastrous shift can be attributed to multiple factors. Firstly, governance failures on the part of the Development Authorities. The ‘Mali Culture’ in the governance sector, where the decision makers assume charge as botanical experts to develop plantation plans, detrimental to ecology. The loopholes in these plans allow the ‘Timber’ and ‘Nursery Mafia’ to exploit the environment. While the timber selling gangs directly benefit from the episodic tree-slaughters in the city, the Nursery mafia profits out of the hybrid and ornamental plants that cannot sustain local climate and require investments time and again. In the face of these developments, the best that authorities do is to come up with narratives such as the paper mulberry and new plantation story.  If machinery worth millions can be brought for construction why not tree transplanter machines. In fact tree possessing transplanters should be made compulsory for all housing authorities.

Reactionary policies and ad-hoc measures, in addition to the commercialisation of natural resources like trees and the environment, are deteriorating the ecological balance. Sufficient legal oversight and sanction mechanisms are required to deal with the growing threat of climate change. Moreover, policy-making regarding environment-related issues or urban development plans should be inclusive of the inputs from experts from institutes established for such matters. The National Agriculture Research Centre (NARC), Arid Agriculture University, and the Islamabad Wildlife Management Board have sufficient expertise and advisory mechanisms.

The world, both in terms of climate disruption as well as technological upgradation, has evolved. Pakistan is the fifth most climate-vulnerable country in the world, but it is also a state growing in terms of its non-kinetic satellite capabilities. The recently launched Hyperspectral satellite (HS-1) of Pakistan can provide oversight on the nature and impact of tree cutting and rapid urbanisation to facilitate policy making. Furthermore, it can also assist the development of sustainable urban plans. Inclusive policies, appropriate laws and a sustainable approach can pave the way for the conservation of the lifesaving green cover of Pakistan.

Ayesha Shaikh is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The News. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »