Shaza Arif-Machines-28 June 2024

Toby Walsh, Machines Behaving Badly: Morality of AI (Melbourne Victoria; La Trobe University Press, 2022)

Reviewed by Shaza Arif

Looking ahead into the next three decades, there will be hardly any industry left untouched by Artificial Intelligence. It is due to this reason, that the impacts, challenges, and dilemmas associated with AI have been the focal point of discussion in the tech community. Authored by Toby Walsh, the book ‘Machines Behaving Badly: Morality of AI’ is another take on this subject. Walsh is the Chief Scientist at UNSW.ai, the AI institute of The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney.

From the outset, Walsh clearly asserts that AI is an impressive and helpful tool, but it is often misused. By citing examples of individuals and tech corporations, he constructs a compelling argument about the mishandling of this technology. He explains that AI is sometimes employed as a facade to justify actions that would otherwise be deemed criminal, such as racial discrimination, automated theft, and information manipulation. After exploring the potential benefits, risks, and related concepts, the author concludes the book by advocating for limiting the role of machines in decision-making in the future.

Walsh offers a fascinating perspective on the roles of various actors engaging with technology. The categorisation of individuals and tech companies into groups with intriguing labels such as ‘transhumanists’, ‘techno-libertarians’, and the ‘new titans’, based on their AI perceptions, is particularly thought-provoking. Here he provides clear insights into the current tech landscape, highlighting the conflicting value alignment between society and industry. While society aspires to a welfare state, the industry seeks to increase societal dependency on its tech products and services. In fact, using examples of leading tech giants, the book illustrates how the problematic behaviour of machines is driven by the financial interests of corporations. These interests, the author argues, will only grow over time, exacerbating the troubling behaviour of AI systems.

The author highlights an essential and timely concept: how ‘deep learning’ has garnered significant attention, overshadowing other crucial aspects of AI. Individuals working in deep learning are often regarded as the ‘Godfathers of AI,’ while many others, particularly women who have made groundbreaking contributions to the field, have been unfairly sidelined. In fact, the book contains a comprehensive list of individuals who are still awaiting due recognition for their work, like Joy Buolamwini, Timnit Gebru, Margaret Mitchell Fei-Fei Li, and Cynthia Breazeal.

Toby Walsh urges readers not to be overwhelmed by the traditional narratives dominated by ideas of superintelligence and machines replacing humanity. Instead, he advocates viewing AI as a tool that empowers humans to foster innovation. He also challenges discussions around robot rights and responsible robots, arguing that these debates lack substantive value. The focus, he insists, should remain on human rights, which have been increasingly compromised since the advent of machines.

Although the book is concise, at just 276 pages (Kindle version) and easily readable in a single sitting, it addresses multiple subjects in a well-structured manner. Walsh’s subtle wit adds an engaging layer to the text, capturing the reader’s interest. The philosophical undertones about pain, suffering, and free will in the context of human-machine interaction make the book rather moving. Walsh maintains a balanced perspective throughout, repeatedly highlighting the misuse of technology across various sectors while also acknowledging its potential for societal benefit in the same industries. The examples provided are concise yet impactful, free from unnecessary details. Notably, the examples related to autonomous driving offer a compelling glimpse into a transformative future. The book’s 2061 epilogue leaves a lasting impression – it makes one to recognise that we are living in one of the most pivotal phases shaping the future of technology. How will future generations view the decisions being made today is the question that stuck with the most.

Machines Behaving Badly also serves as a critical reminder to policymakers that, despite rapid innovation, human presence and oversight need to remain central across all sectors. The author underscores the inherent risks of predictive analytics, particularly in areas like algorithmic sentencing, cautioning against over-reliance on AI due to its potential for error. A significant focus is placed on the integration of AI in the military sector, where Walsh raises serious concerns about the increasing autonomy of AI-powered weapons. He warns that such developments could escalate risks, effectively bringing danger closer to our doorsteps. Throughout the book, he firmly challenges the assumption that AI systems will inherently adhere to ethical and moral standards, cautioning that such expectations are misguided. As a result, he advocates for decisive policy measures, including the imposition of bans where necessary. He argues that even partial bans could serve as practical and effective tools to manage the risks associated with AI, ensuring its development aligns with societal safety and ethical considerations.

What sets this book apart is its ability to resonate with readers at different levels of expertise. For those with a foundational understanding, it serves as an accessible yet enriching guide. For seasoned professionals, its nuanced perspectives and incisive critiques make it a compelling and refreshing read. With its engaging style and rich content, the book not only informs but also inspires readers to think critically about the role of AI in shaping our future. It’s more than just a good read – it is a meaningful investment of time and thought, well worth the effort for anyone trying to understand the complexities of our AI-driven world.

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »