Shaza Arif-WFH-VFH-Dem-Oped thumbnail-April-2024 -op 3

The COVID-19 pandemic left behind many enduring legacies, with remote work, commonly known as Work-From-Home (WFH) being one of its more enduring ones. Back then, workplaces witnessed a remarkable revamp in routines, schedules and practices. Weekly office meetings shifted from conference rooms to living rooms via virtual meeting apps. Home desks assumed the role of office cabins, complete with the added benefit of flexible working hours in many instances. This new paradigm of work demonstrated a largely positive impact in different sectors with increased productivity, better work-life balance, and environment-friendly results – a reason that has led to the continuation of the trend even after the pandemic. Now, it’s time to analyse how to effectively increase adoption of this innovative mode to crucial domains – such as education, finance, media, marketing, customer service and political processes etc.

In the realm of political processes, electoral procedures vis-Ă -vis remote voting requires attention given its cornerstone role in democratic values. While WFH has demonstrated its success and adaptability, the true potential of Vote-From-Home (VFH) remains to be seen.

In the regional context, 2024 marks an important election year in South Asia as polls were held in Pakistan and are scheduled shortly in India. While many citizens desire to use their political rights and cast their vote, many need help to perform their civic responsibility due to impeding factors such as age, health conditions, and proximity to polling stations, amongst other factors. With regards to Pakistan, the state already maintains a postal ballot system for government officials, armed force personnel and their families along with differently-abled voters to exercise their voting right. Likewise, recently, the Indian Election Commission for the first time announced its VFH services for senior citizens above 85 years of age and people with 40 percent disabilities to facilitate 85 lakh senior citizens and 88.4 lakh differently-abled voters. The Indian Election Commission primarily uses electronic voting for general elections. However, it will rely on the traditional postal ballot for the VFH category votes along with a lengthy manual process beforehand – a practice that already exists in several countries, including Pakistan.

While these approaches may help thousands of voters to cast their votes from the comfort of their homes, exploring other innovative options, mainly via E-voting, is also necessary in South Asia. Online voting platforms, such as encrypted mobile applications, could be employed to improve existing voting procedures. Such apps can be further strengthened and secured via use of blockchain technology for electoral voting across the world. Using such technology in the election process can combat voter fraud, increase participation, reduce associated costs, increase process transparency, and lead to timely results. Indeed, these are some of the issues that have always been a source of concern, particularly voter turnout. In Pakistan, voter turnout this year was only 48 percent, suggesting that approximately half of the voters were unable to vote.

Over time, these technologies could extend beyond aiding those facing inconveniences, potentially becoming widespread tools for the majority of the population during elections. To be fair, several administrative, technical, and logistical challenges may be encountered in integrating this technology particularly in the rural areas, yet the potential benefits are plentiful to embark on this digital transformation.

Such transformative shifts are not merely about convenience; they manifest progress, innovation and adaptability that could be introduced in society. They underscore the role of technology that could be used not only for incremental improvements but also to streamline critical affairs. While emerging technologies are being applied across a host of other sectors, it is important to utilise them optimally for collective good. Hence, such technologies and methods should also be promoted to improve the efficiency of the voting process and enhance citizen participation across the board.

As they say, change is the only constant. It is the need of the technologically-advanced era that innovative options are explored, letting go of traditional methods, outdated for the current time. It is crucial to remember that every voice must be heard in order for democratic processes to thrive. In a similar fashion in which organisations thrived as individuals contributed miles away from their workplaces, it is possible that the introduction of a new mode of voting could make the process much more smooth and transparent while ensuring that it is inclusive and accessible. Hence, governments worldwide and in Pakistan should embrace the technological momentum and be more forthcoming to implement a similar shift in their democratic process. Despite the electoral outcome, it is imperative to make the process more convenient and effective for all, augmenting the very foundations of democracy.

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »