Uswa Khan-India-PsedoSat-MDS-a

The advent of technology has compelled states to revolutionise their security structures which can withstand the escalating threats concerns vis à vis land, sea, and airspace domains. Over time, an integral component in the domain of warfare has gained exponential importance i.e., space and satellites. The dependency of states on aerospace assets has created both opportunities and challenges, enabling governments to acquire and utilise space assets especially to enhance their military capabilities. This militarisation of space has resulted in a deep sense of insecurity among nations.

The United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), Russia, China, India, Germany, Italy, and  Israel are increasingly employing space assets primarily for intelligence, surveillance, remote sensing, and communication purposes. Over 90% of the UK’s military forces are reliant on space assets, whereas the dependency of the US on the space-based capabilities  is crucial because it serves as a critical enabler for satellites communication, navigation, missile warnings – missile tracking (MW/MT) and intelligence gathering. In this context, another significant addition in the aerospace technologies is High Altitude Pseudo-Satellites (HAPS).

HAPS are autonomous and solar battery-powered multi-mission military unmanned aerial vehicles. They can remain stationary (airborne) unlike other satellites, providing extensive geographical coverage, maritime monitoring, military surveillance and reconnaissance, and multiple payloads. HAPS have long endurance for extended periods of time i.e., weeks to months with an approximate altitude of 65,000 feet. They serve as a vital link between satellites and ground-based telecommunication networks mainly for facilitating data transfer.

In South Asia, India is considered a key player in manufacturing aerospace technologies and HAPS for enhancing their Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence and Surveillance (C4ISR). In pursuit of regional hegemony and global influence, Indian NewSpace Research and Technologies (NRT) Private Limited and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) have developed  a solar powered HAP named ‘Combat Air Teaming System – CATS Infinity’.  It will be used for deep aerial strikes, surveillance and real-time communication purposes i.e., military and civilian applications with an endurance level of three months

With the help of these pseudo satellites one can assume that India can reap multiple strategic and military benefits. HAPS are considerably cost-effective as compared to other satellites. Additionally, they can aid in border patrolling due to their area specific monitoring, offering live imagery and communication to military for their operations in remote areas which can help India to monitor its borders with China and Pakistan. In maritime operations, one technical task is the ‘problem of identification’ of vessels, whether they are civilian or navy vessels/warships. HAPS can aptly identify and differentiate the incoming vessels due to their high definition optical and infrared camera. This technology will enable the Indian Armed Forces to have efficient and effective naval operations and surveillance in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). It is worth mentioning that high-resolution capability of HAPS can be used to monitor the deployment and movements of the strategic assets which may establish new avenues for espionage or surveillance both in times of peace and conflict.

On the other hand, advancements in the acquisition and development of indigenous pseudo-satellites and aerospace technologies by India may raise security concerns for the neighbouring countries especially Pakistan, considering the antagonistic history between the two. ‘Integrated Dynamics’ – a Pakistani privately-owned company – is also in the process of developing an indigenous version of high-altitude pseudo-satellites i.e., SOLARIS and STRATOS, for civilian as well as military purposes.

The significant investments in manufacturing or acquiring such advanced technologies may not align well with the pressing needs of both nations, given their current poverty levels – India at 21.9% and Pakistan at 24.3%. This allocation dilemma highlights a pivotal concern: the trade-off between enhancing military capabilities and addressing critical development challenges that directly affect citizens’ lives and livelihoods. In this context, an analytical conclusion suggests a strategic pivot is necessary. Instead of engaging in a technological arms race, India and Pakistan could achieve greater benefits by reallocating resources towards initiatives aimed at reducing poverty, improving health, education, and economic opportunities for their citizens. Such a shift in priorities could not only significantly uplift the quality of life within both countries but also potentially ease regional tensions, fostering a climate of mutual growth and stability.

Uswa Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit:  Mysha Dua Salma


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »