Tourism-Zainabv Iftikhar-MDS

In a world more connected than ever, the allure of travel has become irresistible, transforming once-hidden gems into bustling tourist magnets. However, as the global tourism industry expands at an unprecedented rate, the shadow of ‘overtourism’ looms large over the most cherished destinations. Tourism involves the movement of people to places outside their usual environment for leisure, business, or other purposes. It can be domestic (within the traveler’s own country) or international (outside the traveler’s country). ‘Overtourism’, on the other hand, is a situation where there are too many visitors to a particular destination, resulting in negative impacts on the environment, infrastructure, historical sites, local residents, and even the visitors’ experience. Hence, it’s important to explore and dissect the multifaceted consequences of overtourism on destinations, residents, cultures, and ecosystems and come up with sustainable tourism practices.

Tourism undeniably injects vitality into local economies, creating jobs, boosting businesses, and contributing to the overall prosperity of specific areas and countries. Yet, the question is: at what cost? The economic boon often comes hand in hand with economic inequality. Tourism Economics research shows that ‘developing nations encourage international travel to spur rapid economic growth, even though a substantial portion of tourism employment is still low-paid seasonal labour. The same holds true for developed nations as well because big businesses in the service sector typically have better benefits than their employees.’ For example, Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh because of overtourism is faced with economic disparities as tourism benefits only a few companies and individuals, while many locals remain impoverished, hence, broadening the gap between the classes.

One of the most conspicuous consequences of overtourism is the environmental toll it takes on destinations. Popular tourist spots frequently suffer from overcrowding, leading to degradation of natural landscapes, pollution, and stress on local ecosystems. For instance, the Shandur Polo Festival in Gilgit-Baltistan, a much loved and celebrated sports event celebrated annually has started to leave an alarming mark on GB’s ecosystem. ‘Your three days of happiness at the Shandur Polo Festival cause us to endure 362 days of horrible suffering due to illnesses, livestock mortality, toxic air, polluted streams, and piles of waste everywhere’ lamented Jamati Khan after the 2023 Polo festival. 

In the face of global climate change, around ‘8% of the carbon emissions produced worldwide are attributable to tourism in the shape of boat voyages, souvenirs, air flights, and lodging’ according to the Sustainable Travel Organisation.

As tourists flock to experience the authenticity of different cultures, the very essence they seek can become diluted. While adapting to cater to mass tourism, destinations may inadvertently compromise their unique cultural identities. Indigenous customs and local traditions risk being eclipsed by a homogenized, tourist-centric culture. A Pakistan Institute of Development Economies (PIDE) research shows that in Gilgit-Baltistan, tourism has a considerable social and cultural impact. The surge in tourist numbers is altering the authentic character and practices of the location causing subtle transformations in the local community’s clothing, dietary habits, and daily routines due to cultural integration.

The World Tourism Organisation has estimated that ‘the number of international tourists will exceed two billion by the end of this decade.’ As iconic destinations attract millions, the challenge of overtourism extends beyond geographical limits, affecting places globally. In response, regions like Europe have begun implementing ‘anti-tourism strategies’ to deter mass tourism. Venice has implemented a charge for entry ranging from €3 to €10 to visit the city and its islands since it is so overrun by tourists. To manage overcrowding, Greece has put in place a time-slot system for Acropolis tourists.

Governments play a crucial role in overseeing travel destinations. As such, they should advocate for and enforce sustainable tourism practices that emphasise environmental conservation, responsible visitor behaviour, and the welfare of local communities. These practices entail eco-friendly lodging, less consumption of environmental resources, and the use of public transport. Off-peak travel should be promoted by developing campaigns and incentives to encourage tourists to explore destinations during non-peak seasons. This can help distribute tourist flows more evenly throughout the year, reducing the strain on infrastructure and minimising the impact of overtourism during peak periods. Technology and data analytics should be utilised to monitor and manage tourist flows. The implementation of smart destination management systems can provide real-time information on visitor numbers, allowing for proactive measures to control crowds and mitigate potential issues. For instance, ‘the Feel Florence app in Italy recognises the stream of tourists in real-time and proposes routes to the user in line with that information. Its ‘Skip the Line’ feature, meanwhile, steers travellers to destinations that are less congested.’

In essence, while tourism in itself can be beneficial and sustainable if managed properly, overtourism represents an excessive and often damaging influx of visitors that exceeds the carrying capacity of a destination. The challenge for many popular tourist spots is to find a balance that allows for tourism growth while minimising the negative impacts of overtourism. The latter necessitates reimagining the ways of collective wanderlust, urging a shift from quantity to quality, from unchecked growth to sustainable exploration. Navigating the consequences of overtourism requires a shared commitment from policymakers and businesses to travellers themselves to forge a path where the wonders of the world can be enjoyed without compromising the very essence that makes them extraordinary.

Zainab Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Slaman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »