Social Media’s Role-Ujala-MDS

In this era of information warfare, rapid communication tools, such as Facebook, Skype, Text, Instagram, Linkedin, Twitter, and WhatsApp, are frequently exploited by adversaries for communication and data sharing. Oxford Internet Institute reported that these platforms empower various entities to manipulate public opinion, challenge opposing narratives, and spread deceptive information to achieve political objectives in foreign nations. UNESCO Digital Library explains that the algorithms implemented by social media platforms notably contribute to the propagation of extremist content. Such algorithms are crafted to emphasise engaging and contentious posts due to their ability to increase user interaction and advertisement revenue. 

As a result, inflammatory and divisive content often gains greater exposure compared to narratives endorsing peace and unity. This phenomenon has been evident in online interactions involving various stakeholders in Pakistan. It poses a threat to national and internal security as it can fuel tensions, exacerbate divisions, and potentially lead to unrest and instability within the country. Threats to peace can vary from minor public disturbances to widespread violence or even full-fledged insurrections. Internal security challenges can target a state’s citizens, its institutional structures, or its infrastructure. These challenges can manifest as minor crimes, organised criminal activities, political disturbances, industrial conflicts, or domestic terrorist acts. Additionally, external nations can pose threats to a country’s internal security by either directly engaging in or sponsoring acts of terrorism or rebellion, all without an official declaration of war.

Without appropriate legal management, social media risks disrupting the information landscape. The Arab Spring in the Middle East and Africa serves as an example, where platforms like Twitter and Facebook were primarily utilised to promote anti-state sentiments. Hence, in many contexts, especially in Pakistan as well, social media is increasingly viewed as a potential risk to national security and democracy. There have been 71.70 million social media users in Pakistan as of January 2023, according to Datareportal. This number represented 30.1% of the country’s population at that time, underscoring the significance of social media platforms in shaping political narratives through the rapid dissemination of information.

The News reported that FIA identified approximately 2,100 Twitter accounts as part of a disinformation campaign targeting state institutions with an aim to drive a wedge between the state and citizens. In such cases, efforts by Law Enforcement Agencies for national security are paramount. A primary reason for the increase in anti-state material on social media is the absence of stringent regulation and monitoring on these platforms. Due to minimal oversight, individuals with extremist views can spread their harmful ideologies while maintaining anonymity. Consequently, unverified narratives become prevalent without thorough fact-checking or validation. 

Various measures have been implemented to address online extremism in Pakistan. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) established the Cyber Vigilance Division, which is playing a crucial role in monitoring and addressing extremist online behaviours. This Division works in tandem with technology firms and law enforcement to identify, eliminate, or restrict accounts that promote hate or incite violence. Furthermore, countering extremist ideologies involves crafting narratives that oppose such extremist beliefs. Additionally, it is essential to educate the public on the perils of online extremism. Initiatives that spotlight the misleading strategies of extremists can enable individuals to critically assess content on social media. Fostering media literacy among the population can lead to a society better equipped against external influences and radicalisation.

Meanwhile, collaboration among civil society groups, educational institutions, religious leaders, and influential individuals can help disseminate messages of peace, acceptance, and national cohesion via social media endeavours. A notable example of such collaboration occurred when leading Pakistani celebrities initiated the ‘United against Extremism’ campaign. Through impactful video narratives shared across various platforms, they emphasised the importance of rejecting polarising beliefs and celebrating the diversity that enriches Pakistan. These collective efforts serve as a testament to the potential for positive change in online spaces and the promotion of a more inclusive and harmonious society.

Ujala Siddiq is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »