Space-Shaza Arif

The enchanting realm of space exploration continues to unfold new wonders with every passing day, sparking a growing interest among individuals to embark on their own cosmic journeys. While exploring space with the aid of private companies that charge fortunes is a privilege usually reserved for billionaire adventurers, there are occasional exceptions that captivate our attention.

Just last week on 8 September, Virgin Galactic’s third spaceflight set out on a brief mission that seized the spotlight due to some interesting details. The three private explorers, Ken Baxter, Timothy Nash, and Adrian Reynard, two pilots and one instructor, were onboard VSS Unity. However, the presence of two different and unique passengers onboard the voyage added a twist to the journey: fossils of ancient human ancestors. The fossil remains of two ancient species, two-million-years-old Australopithecus sediba’s and 250,000 years old Homo naledi,  held in carbon fiber, emblazoned with the South African flag,  were catapulted into the Virgin Galactic’s spacecraft for a one-hour ride to space, making them the oldest human species to visit space. Australopithecus sediba’s clavicle and Homo naledi’s thumb bone were chosen for the voyage. Both fossil remains were discovered in the Cradle of Humankind – home to human ancestral remains in South Africa.

The episode undoubtedly prompts questions regarding the underlying reason for sending the fossil remains to space in the first place. The episode points out the power of symbolism to convey strong messages. The voyage was a tribute to the ancestors for their contributions that have enabled technological advancement over the years to the level that humanity is aiming for the skies – quite literally. As per Timothy Nash, “it was a moment to contemplate the enterprising spirit of our earliest ancestors, who had embarked on a journey toward exploration and innovation years ago”.

Moreover, the clavicle part of the Australopithecus sediba was deliberately chosen given that it was discovered by a nine-year-old boy, Mathew Berger, son of Lee Berger, a National Geographic Society explorer, who played the major role in discovering both species and handed over the remains to Timothy Nash for the journey. This demonstrated how young individuals can actively participate in scientific endeavors via exploration and discovery. Likewise, the unearthing of Homo naledi  in 2013 led to the revelation of an ancestral species with apelike shoulders with teeth, arms, feet, and brains that resembled closely to human beings – even made symbols and tools in the caves they resided in. The episode important an chapter, given that it uncovered 1550 specimens in one of the largest excavations in Africa, playing a role in developing a better understanding of the origins and evolution of human lineage, particularly in South Africa.    

For those involved in the venture, the event was a truly remarkable episode that made a unique connection between history and space exploration. However, not everyone is pleased with this mission. The event has sparked criticism from  archaeologists and palaeoanthropologists, many of whom have called it a mere publicity stunt and have raised serious concerns over such an act given that it poses risks to the safety of the precious fossils. It was further argued that the act was ethically wrong, and lacked  any concrete scientific justifications.

Setting aside the debate, the episode bridges the gap between the archives of the past and the promising horizons of the future as it underscores the shared journey of the quest for exploration that is shared between us and those who existed ages ago. Moreover, like every other major event in space exploration, it is also a compelling cue to the states that are currently lagging in this race to timely embrace the possibilities of this frontier. Countries like Pakistan and others should derive inspiration from such events to actively embark on their own journeys to space.

Upon their return to South Africa, the relics would soon be displayed in museums and other institutions in the country, offering a chance for the public to view them and draw inspiration. The journey was not only fascinating but is also a testament to space exploration, where fossils once buried deep in the earth are now embarking on celestial journeys. As we witness the rise of commercial space travel, the event is not only a unique moment but also provides glimpses of the multifaceted nature of space exploration that prompts us to reflect on our past, engage the present and anticipate the future that awaits us. As Iqbal mentions in one his verse , translated as:

I see my tomorrow (future) in the mirror of my yesterday (past)

Shaza Arif is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. She can be reached at: [email protected]

Design Credit:  Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »