Enigmatic Encounters Shaza Arif-MDS

Sailing from Lerwick, United Kingdom to Bergen, Norway in June this year, Dr Wim Rutten was taken aback when nearby orcas (also called killer whales) started ramming his boat. The incident was not an isolated one. It is part of a series of orca attacks occurring since 2020.

Orcas are renowned for their sharp cognitive abilities, have strong social structures and are naturally endowed with complex and collaborative problem-solving. Of late, these intelligent animals have attracted attention due to their notorious involvement in a curious and risky game. This newly observed behaviour includes chasing boats in small groups. The attacking strategy includes breaking off the ship’s rudders – the vital apparatus used to govern its direction. The latter’s dismantlement, which renders the ship immobile, marks the termination of the encounter.

These interactions have sparked growing concerns amongst the maritime and scientific communities since the frequency and intensity of the attacks have now reached an unprecedented level. In the last three years, approximately 500  ramming instances have been reported, with a significant portion (350) concentrated solely in the Iberian Peninsula. In May 2023 alone, 20 such instances were reported, further exacerbating the problem. Notably, the behaviour has been observed frequently in the waters of the Strait of Gibraltar and has been moving up north, as evidenced by the recent encounters in the Shetland Islands in Scotland. These interactions impact maritime operations, given that three vessels have sunk in southern Europe, while 250 have been considerably damaged ever since these attacks began.

The precise motive behind this strange orca behaviour remains a mystery. Various ideas have come to light. The first is that the orcas are presumably ‘just playing’, given that they are known for their lively demeanour. Their attraction to a vessel’s rudder and the subsequent impact of their actions may merely be a manifestation of their playful nature. On the other hand, a more defensive rationale has also been mentioned as a potential motive for their increased aggression. For example, the animals might have suffered some traumatic experience prompting them to display cautionary behaviour by stopping the boats from avoiding another distressing episode. This idea is rooted in social learning, whereby the younger orcas may be mimicking the observed behaviour of important members such as the matriarch Orca named ‘White Gladis’, considering it necessary for their survival.  ‘White Gladis’ whom many marine experts believe started this ramming ‘trend’ of animals was apparently pregnant when she began this strange act.

The growing number of such incidents indicates a pressing need to explore the root cause of this behaviour, given that it raises concerns about the safety of the vessels and passengers on board in the targeted waters. While it is remarkably fortunate that there have been no instances where human beings have been harmed directly in the encounters with orcas, the possibility cannot be dismissed. In response to the recent occurrences, authorities in Portugal have issued directives to tourist boats, advising them to maintain a safe distance from orcas. This precautionary measure highlights the potential impact on the tourism industry in the affected regions.

Beyond the immediate concern for human safety, one’s heart goes out to the orcas themselves. Their fragile existence is deeply worrisome, with only a mere 40 left in the Strait, classifying them as ‘critically endangered’ according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential threats faced by the killer whale population. If future encounters turn more aggressive, it could further endanger their already vulnerable condition, adding to the challenges they endure. Their behaviour could also be a reflection of underlying stress arising from shifts in their environmental conditions or changes in their food supplies.

These attacks are a compelling call to recognise the impact of human activities on marine life and emphasise the need to ensure practices that are conducive to marine life. As a prudent step for the immediate future, it is crucial to enhance training and equip seafarers to effectively handle such potential threats posed to both their vessels and themselves. This necessitates implementing comprehensive safety measures to safeguard the boats while fostering harmonious co-existence between human beings and marine life. The lack of clarity on the issue suggests that further research is also required to minimise potential risks.

As a humane global community, we must act with both urgency and compassion to safeguard these magnificent creatures and ensure their survival, as well as the safety of those engaged in maritime practices in our precious oceans. By doing so, we can create a harmonious balance that benefits both marine life and the dedicated individuals who rely on the seas for their livelihoods.

Shaza Arif is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at: [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »