fashion

In an era where fashion trends ripple across the world faster than ever before, it is crucial to examine the hidden cost of our sartorial choices. Beyond the allure of glamorous runways and chic storefronts lies a deep and often overlooked connection between the fashion industry and our planet’s most vital resource – water. From dyeing to the finishing processes to the cultivation of raw materials, the world of fashion leaves an indelible mark on the world’s water resources.

As environmental consciousness is gaining momentum, it is crucial to unravel the impact our clothing decisions have on this increasingly scarce resource. First, cotton, one of the most widely used natural fibres in the fashion industry, has a significant impact on water resources. Cotton cultivation requires large amounts of irrigation, contributing to the depletion of freshwater sources. According to research, it takes approximately 2,700 litres of water to produce a single cotton t-shirt. Second, the water footprint extends beyond cotton cultivation and includes the manufacturing processes involved in transforming raw materials into fabrics. Textile production involves several water-intensive stages, including sizing, bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing, scouring and finishing. The dyeing process, in particular, requires vast quantities of water, as the fabrics are immersed in dye baths to achieve the desired colour. As per recent reports, Bangladesh’s underground water resources are depleting severely due to the textile industry. The yearly water consumption of the textile industry is 1,500 billion litres, equivalent to the water consumption of 20 million Dhaka residents for 5-10 months. Third, the improper management of wastewater is a widespread practice in the textile industry, exacerbating water pollution. Many textile factories discharge untreated or poorly treated wastewater directly into nearby water bodies, bypassing proper treatment processes. The wastewater often contains high levels of organic matter, toxic chemicals, and dyes resulting in severe pollution of rivers and other water sources. According to a media report, garment factories in Faisalabad, Pakistan, use 40,000 to 50,000 gallons of water per hour which goes untreated to the city’s main sewage system as the factories have no wastewater treatment or proper drainage system.

Similarly, ‘fast fashion’ refers to the production of low-cost clothing items at high speed, often leading to a disposable fashion culture. The fast fashion industry’s contribution to climate change further exacerbates water scarcity concerns. According to UN reports, the fashion industry contributes 8-10% to greenhouse emissions annually.  The rise of fast fashion and its relentless demand for new trends has exacerbated the problem with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) anticipating a rise of more than 60% emissions by the textile industry by 2030.

To promote sustainability, it is recommended to focus on improving wastewater treatment by implementing advanced technologies that effectively remove harmful chemicals and pollutants before discharging the water. Some methods to consider include the use of effluent treatment plants, biodegradation and oxidation. Moreover, water recycling systems should be set up in textile factories to help reduce water consumption and minimise pollution. Conservation measures such as rainwater harvesting and water-efficient technologies can also play a crucial role in mitigating water pollution.

Responsible consumer behaviour can contribute significantly to coping with fashion’s water footprints. Consumers should be educated about the environmental impact of fast fashion and responsible buying habits should be promoted. Emphasising the value of quality over quantity, supporting ethical and sustainable fashion brands, and practising clothing repair, reuse, and recycling are crucial steps in this regard.

At the macro level, a crucial step towards addressing the water footprint of the fashion industry is the collaborative effort of governments, fashion industry associations, and international organizations. By working together, they can establish and enforce regulations that promote sustainable practices within the industry. This involves incentivising water-efficient manufacturing processes, enforcing proper wastewater treatment measures, and setting targets to reduce water consumption and pollution. Such collective actions will play a significant role in mitigating the industry’s impact on water resources. Lastly, transparency and supply chain traceability are vital for ensuring compliance. Fast fashion brands must focus on transparency, verifying that environmental and social standards are upheld within their supply chains. Implementing traceability systems will enable the identification and resolution of water-related issues throughout the production process, promote accountability and foster positive change within the industry.

Understanding the water footprint of our clothing choices invites us to re-imagine our relationship with fashion, encouraging us to prioritise sustainable practices and embracing timeless styles to honour the delicate balance of the planet’s water resources. Together, through water conservation practices, we can weave a sustainable future where fashion meets responsibility.

Zainab Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »