Air Taxis

Experimenting, inventing and innovating, the human race has taken such monumental strides forward that the sum now seems greater than the parts. The human ability to progress has long been a defining feature of technological advancement.  As a result of technological developments, in 1903, the world saw the ‘first successful powered airplane, i.e., the Wright Flyer; in 1919, the first transatlantic flight; by 1957, Boeing 707 finally became the first commercial passenger jetliner; and now, the world may see ‘Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing Vehicles (eVTOLs)’ or ‘air taxis’ by 2025

Electric VTOLs are similar to helicopters but more advanced, automated and may operate on batteries or hydrogen fuel cells. They fall under the concept of ‘Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)’. According to NASA, AAM seeks to transport people and cargo in ways not served or underserved by current aviation modes. Describing them as a marriage of Tesla and Uber in the sky, the commercial sector has dubbed them ‘flying taxis’.

An intriguing aspect of these air taxis is that they have piqued the interest of the US Department of Defense (DoD). The DoD’s USD 75 million investment in a company called ‘Joby Aviation’ is just one example of this. Others include (but are not limited to) LIFT aircraft, Archer, LiquidPiston and BETA Technologies. The United States Air Force’s Agility Prime programme exclusively focuses on electric VTOLs, having made USD 11 billion in commercial investment ‘to propel the third revolution in aerospace’. This vision of cultivating an innovation ecosystem, through a range of partnerships, underpins the existence of the USAF innovation arm.

The US government’s interest is also driven by the range of benefits that eVTOLs offer specifically in the military domain. Their military utility may be understood given the advantages of vertical flight in general. Unlike traditional aircrafts, eVTOLs eliminate the need for expansive and expensive runways. They provide greater manoeuvrability in mountainous areas, densely populated urban settings, and confined spaces in general, which otherwise are significantly challenging areas for combat. As the world population climbs exponentially and urbanisation increases, military forces must adapt.

eVTOLs may also be preferable to helicopters. They are relatively quieter than their former counterparts and reducing the acoustic signature increases public acceptability as well as increases the element of surprise in the battlefield. The electric half also means lesser mechanical and hydraulic parts in the design, an elegant simplicity that reduces operational and maintenance costs, respectively. Commercialisation would also bring costs down further. The electric battery introduces the DoD to zero emissions aviation, offering hope of escaping the carbon footprints of average helicopters.

Unlike drones that cannot carry people, eVTOLs can be both manned and unmanned or remotely operated. LIFT’s Hexa can accommodate one person; Joby’s and Archer’s, five people each; and BETA’s Alia, six. Moreover, automation based on software simulations improves flight control and hovering ability. LIFT’s Hexa, is one such semi-autonomous eVTOL. It is so light that it was not even classified as an aircraft by the US Federal Aviation Administration standards thus, it requires little training and no pilot’s license

However, eVTOL technology is not without its challenges. For example, until the battery technology fully matures, hybrid models are in use. Moreover, the trouble with automation is that unexpected automation behaviour is difficult to detect. If a part fails altogether, it is easier to detect, but if a part behaves differently due to an incorrect data entry, the risk multiplies. Even more so if the pilot cannot figure out what exactly is wrong. ‘Mayday!’

Despite such shortcomings, applicability in logistical support, recovery and resupply, and troop insertion and extraction make the technology worth pursuing. US forces can even leverage Hexa’s water-landing capabilities for an amphibious attack. From a technological point of view, collaboration is a fruitful endeavour. The private industry is benefitting from Agility Prime by having access to USAF engineers, and otherwise restricted air space. Such a supportive cushion, particularly from one of the world’s mightiest forces, will help accelerate development. Such public-private partnerships are also likely to catalyse improvement in battery technology as well as potentially reduce technical concerns, such as range, payload, endurance etc. over time, bringing down costs further in the process. Air Force in itself is a child of technological advancement. This approach will help broaden its horizons further.

Innovation begets innovation. Had a toy helicopter made of bamboo not inspired the Wright brothers, perhaps the subsequent breakthroughs in aviation would not have followed, and perhaps there may not have been an electric helicopter under discussion today.

Bakhtawar Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »