Chat GPT

The power of a conversation should never be underestimated. OpenAI’s recently-launched chatbot, ChatGPT has certainly exemplified this sentiment, garnering widespread attention since its launch. It has reached a record 100 million active users in just two months. People from all around the world have been exploring the chatbot due to its incredible capabilities in a variety of text-based tasks. As per a response from ChatGPT regarding its functions, it can answer questions related to diverse fields, generate and complete text, summarise lengthy documents, rephrase information, make recommendations, translate various languages, compose poems and stories, and converse regarding various issues, amongst other tasks. It is worth noting that although ChatGPT is a chatbot, while Google search is a search engine, the two are being discussed together and compared at various platforms such as CNBC, The New York Times, PC Mag, and Live Mint, etc. Hence, it is important to explore whether ChatGPT could emerge as the next go-to platform in future.

Having used the chatbot over the past few days, here are some observations. Firstly, similar to Google search, the software is impressive given that it quickly provides relevant and factual information, making it an excellent source of knowledge. Furthermore, even when grammatical errors are present in the queries, the software still manages to respond effectively.

While it mirrors Google’s efficiency in providing timely information, numerous factors set the two apart. ChatGPT provides human-like information in language form, whereas Google search navigates us to different websites and provides data with pictures, sources, applications, etc. Additionally, when it comes to providing information, ChatGPT’s capabilities are somewhat limited. For example, when asked to provide details of opinion articles of Dr Maleeha Lodhi, it provided only brief information regarding her and was unable to find her academic work as opposed to Google search, which offers vast information with the same question.

When it comes to up-to-date information, ChatGPT again has its limitations. When asked about the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Chabot gave information regarding former PM Imran Khan, revealing that its knowledge cutoff date is September 2021. As a result, the chatbot cannot be relied upon to provide the most recent and updated information, unlike Google search, which is updated every second and provides the latest information available.

ChatGPT’s limitations extend beyond the realm of knowledge and information. For example, the chatbot is not capable of real-time internet searches. When asked about the likelihood of rain in the coming week, the chatbot’s response was limited to the data it had been trained on, and it was unable to make a prediction about the weather forecast. Similarly, it cannot track a flight in real time nor provide the live run rate of a cricket match, both of which Google search can do efficiently.

With regards to reliability, it can be inferred that Google search is more reliable than ChatGPT. This is because the information provided on Google search is traced from a specific website or source. In contrast, when asked to provide the source of an answer regarding ‘Role of Airpower in South Asia’, ChatGPT was unable to do so and instead stated that the information was based on widely accepted concepts and principles related to the topic at hand. Interestingly, when asked whether ChatGPT considered itself to be more reliable than Google search, it admitted that Google search was currently more reliable. However, the bot noted that it had a unique advantage over Google search in its ability to understand context and provide more relevant information to the user.

ChatGPT demonstrates greater capabilities and creativity than Google search when it comes to composition. For example, when asked to compose a poem on Pakistan’s economy, the chatbot was able to draft well-crafted couplets within seconds. It also generated structured and engaging stories on various themes such as truthfulness, hope, and robots. Moreover, it can also draft customised letters and applications tailored to the user’s requirements.

Another distinguishing feature that sets ChatGPT apart from Google search is its conversational mode, which offers a more personalised touch. When asked to explain the phenomena of machine learning, the response generated was similar to conversing with a subject expert. The chatbot could recall previous questions and answers, which enabled it to generate more relevant and engaging responses. In contrast, Google search provides comprehensive and factual information, but lacks the ability to provide tailored feedback or interact with the user in a conversational manner.

ChatGPT and Google search are two different tools with unique features and capabilities. While both platforms provide valuable information to users, ChatGPT offers a more personalised and conversational approach, making it an excellent choice for those seeking human-like interactions. On the other hand, Google search excels in providing more up to date (at least so far), live, diverse, comprehensive, and reliable information. Ultimately, the choice of the go-to platform will depend on a user’s needs and preferences, as well as the specific task at hand. As AI technology continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see further advancements and improvements in both ChatGPT and Google search, making them even more powerful and useful tools in the future.

The writer is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »