Chat GPT

The power of a conversation should never be underestimated. OpenAI’s recently-launched chatbot, ChatGPT has certainly exemplified this sentiment, garnering widespread attention since its launch. It has reached a record 100 million active users in just two months. People from all around the world have been exploring the chatbot due to its incredible capabilities in a variety of text-based tasks. As per a response from ChatGPT regarding its functions, it can answer questions related to diverse fields, generate and complete text, summarise lengthy documents, rephrase information, make recommendations, translate various languages, compose poems and stories, and converse regarding various issues, amongst other tasks. It is worth noting that although ChatGPT is a chatbot, while Google search is a search engine, the two are being discussed together and compared at various platforms such as CNBC, The New York Times, PC Mag, and Live Mint, etc. Hence, it is important to explore whether ChatGPT could emerge as the next go-to platform in future.

Having used the chatbot over the past few days, here are some observations. Firstly, similar to Google search, the software is impressive given that it quickly provides relevant and factual information, making it an excellent source of knowledge. Furthermore, even when grammatical errors are present in the queries, the software still manages to respond effectively.

While it mirrors Google’s efficiency in providing timely information, numerous factors set the two apart. ChatGPT provides human-like information in language form, whereas Google search navigates us to different websites and provides data with pictures, sources, applications, etc. Additionally, when it comes to providing information, ChatGPT’s capabilities are somewhat limited. For example, when asked to provide details of opinion articles of Dr Maleeha Lodhi, it provided only brief information regarding her and was unable to find her academic work as opposed to Google search, which offers vast information with the same question.

When it comes to up-to-date information, ChatGPT again has its limitations. When asked about the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Chabot gave information regarding former PM Imran Khan, revealing that its knowledge cutoff date is September 2021. As a result, the chatbot cannot be relied upon to provide the most recent and updated information, unlike Google search, which is updated every second and provides the latest information available.

ChatGPT’s limitations extend beyond the realm of knowledge and information. For example, the chatbot is not capable of real-time internet searches. When asked about the likelihood of rain in the coming week, the chatbot’s response was limited to the data it had been trained on, and it was unable to make a prediction about the weather forecast. Similarly, it cannot track a flight in real time nor provide the live run rate of a cricket match, both of which Google search can do efficiently.

With regards to reliability, it can be inferred that Google search is more reliable than ChatGPT. This is because the information provided on Google search is traced from a specific website or source. In contrast, when asked to provide the source of an answer regarding ‘Role of Airpower in South Asia’, ChatGPT was unable to do so and instead stated that the information was based on widely accepted concepts and principles related to the topic at hand. Interestingly, when asked whether ChatGPT considered itself to be more reliable than Google search, it admitted that Google search was currently more reliable. However, the bot noted that it had a unique advantage over Google search in its ability to understand context and provide more relevant information to the user.

ChatGPT demonstrates greater capabilities and creativity than Google search when it comes to composition. For example, when asked to compose a poem on Pakistan’s economy, the chatbot was able to draft well-crafted couplets within seconds. It also generated structured and engaging stories on various themes such as truthfulness, hope, and robots. Moreover, it can also draft customised letters and applications tailored to the user’s requirements.

Another distinguishing feature that sets ChatGPT apart from Google search is its conversational mode, which offers a more personalised touch. When asked to explain the phenomena of machine learning, the response generated was similar to conversing with a subject expert. The chatbot could recall previous questions and answers, which enabled it to generate more relevant and engaging responses. In contrast, Google search provides comprehensive and factual information, but lacks the ability to provide tailored feedback or interact with the user in a conversational manner.

ChatGPT and Google search are two different tools with unique features and capabilities. While both platforms provide valuable information to users, ChatGPT offers a more personalised and conversational approach, making it an excellent choice for those seeking human-like interactions. On the other hand, Google search excels in providing more up to date (at least so far), live, diverse, comprehensive, and reliable information. Ultimately, the choice of the go-to platform will depend on a user’s needs and preferences, as well as the specific task at hand. As AI technology continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see further advancements and improvements in both ChatGPT and Google search, making them even more powerful and useful tools in the future.

The writer is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »