China-Pakistan-versus-US-India1-1068x561

Spanning over two decades, the end of the Afghan war heralds a new era not just for Afghanistan, but for the entire region and brings forth an opportunity to rebuild and reconnect for a better future. However, regional connectivity is in such disarray that the World Bank has termed South Asia as one of the least integrated regions in the world. In this backdrop, recent remarks by Pakistan’s Prime Minister for a ‘Peaceful and Prosperous South Asia’ seem to be in the best interest of the region. He insisted that Pakistan wants to enhance regional connectivity and also offered to abate the brewing Cold War before it renders disastrous effects on the region. He emphasised that Islamabad won’t ally itself with any bloc in this war. This article looks at the multilateral relationships of major South Asian countries and the potential for an integrated region with no tolerance for becoming a theatre for major power rivalry.

The relationship between Pakistan and India – two of the most important states in South Asia – are primarily responsible for defining the regional security environment, which is essentially hijacked owing to the heated rivalry between the two. Pakistan has repeatedly offered to negotiate contentious issues with India starting from Jammu and Kashmir, especially after the current administration’s indication to pivot to geo-economics and desire to bury the past. Pakistan has also been making overtures to bring about a thaw in its ties with Bangladesh. Meanwhile, extensive efforts have been made to take bilateral cooperation with Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and Maldives a step further. Moreover, Pakistan-China ties have always been lauded as those between iron brothers, and as for Afghanistan, Pakistan is one of the few countries advocating an end to the country’s instability.

Although not a part of the geographic map of South Asia, China also holds immense importance when it comes to the regional security calculus. As far as the connectivity of the region is concerned, Beijing is already involved in billion dollar projects (through its Belt and Road Initiative) seeking to connect not just South Asian countries, but the entire Continent. China and India also enjoy growing trade ties, but the security ties between the two have been deteriorating lately, leading to an uptick in tensions between the two regional giants.

India also has extensive trade ties with its neighbours, but the growth in these relations has largely remained stale over the last few years, owing to the protectionist, fascist, and ultra-nationalist policies of the BJP government. Furthermore, India has also adopted a policy of bullying its smaller neighbours through its economic, diplomatic, and military influence. These nations have grown increasingly frustrated by India’s selfish theatrics, which hinders the achievement of paced regional prosperity. However, the issue with a determining impact on ‘an integrated region’ is India’s increasingly hostile attitude towards Pakistan. New Delhi has denounced all rapprochement attempts made by Islamabad for bringing stability in the region.

The reasons behind India’s belligerent attitude towards Pakistan particularly and other neighbours in general lies in the heightening confidence it draws from its close relationship with the US. This New Delhi-Washington partnership has allowed India to continue its ruthless behaviour towards its neighbors as well as its own minorities.

Secondly, India’s inclinations to ally with the US against China in a potential Cold War II has the likelihood to further push the region into another round of uncertainty and instability. India’s polices of transforming this region into a battleground of major powers contending for influence serves a more defining blow to Pakistan’s aspirations of preventing the region from bearing the brunt of superpower rivalry.

Although, India has failed miserably in standing any chance of competing with China militarily, its aggressive policies towards the latter (and countries hosting BRI projects, especially Pakistan) can stall the growth of the initiative. As BRI is the lynchpin of China’s rise, its slowed pace is exactly what would be desired by the US.

It should be noted that alignment with blocs is not problematic in itself. It only becomes so when the aligned country becomes some bigger power’s puppet and doesn’t hesitate from playing dirty politics in its own region for the interests of the greater power, which is exactly what India is doing.

Indian leadership must realize that it cannot possibly become a fully developed state while the whole region that geographically encircles it, is embroiled in a host of issues as also propounded by the Regional Security Complex Theory.

Moreover, the US must not endorse India’s destructive behaviour, since it is the US’ open support for India’s belligerence that causes troubles for South Asia. The US’ objective of China containment by supporting India in its hegemonic assertions can backfire, resulting in heightening frustration among regional actors against Washington.

Therefore, while Pakistan’s liberal sentiments of an integrated region, free from the perils of Cold War II are extremely commendable, they cannot be realized as long as India’s reckless attitude continues. Moreover, this situation puts Pakistan in great predicament, where it is not willing to choose sides owing to its dependence on both the US and China and may not be able to stay non-aligned given regional and international dynamics. Although, almost a Gordian knot, Islamabad must tread extremely prudently to maintain a balance, or it will be doomed to bear the brunt of the emerging power dynamics.

Khansa Qureshi is a researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source:  Ullah, Barkat.  2021. “Pakistan’s concerns over the growing strategic ties of US India.” Global Village Space, January 1. https://www.globalvillagespace.com/op-ed-pakistans-has-concerns-over-the-growing-strategic-ties-of-us-india/


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »