Related_Image_AI_in_Health_Sector

Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have taken the world by storm. Whether for military or civilian use, the hybrid character of AI has placed it in high demand. On the one hand, the world is witnessing an AI arms race to dominate adversaries, while on the other, AI is being used to serve humanity. The widespread applications of AI in various sectors such as health, education and agriculture etc. depicts its significance in the civil sector.

Since AI is invisible to the human eye, it has induced changes in how the security landscape in particular is also adopting this technology. In this regard, a great deal of focus seems to be on its more harmful use. In all fairness, we should also see the benefits we can reap from this technology. One area where AI has proven to be beneficial is the health sector. Contrary to popular perception, AI applications have been used in diagnosing and treating diseases for nearly 50 years. One such example is the Natural Language Processing (NLP) application that is used to understand and classify clinical documentation.

Recently, scientists have found that AI can be used to study impacts of diseases on the human body and how these diseases can ‘alter the human body.’ The integrated system developed will help doctors to ascertain the difference in images down to single cell and study its effects after a disease or an injury. This tool has been named ‘TDAExplore’ and uses topology and AI to recognise alterations in the human body. In light of this, it can be assumed that AI will not only be helpful in solving existing problems in disease identification, but could also be beneficial in future studies.

One such potential use could be studying the cause and impact of the so-called ‘Havana Syndrome’. In the United States, four more cases of this syndrome were reported in Europe this year. According to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the government is investigating the matter. The ‘Havana Syndrome’ was first reported in Cuba in 2016, in which 16 US officials fell sick to a possible acoustic attack having symptoms ranging from hearing loss to mild brain injuries. Since, the cause and impacts of this mysterious illness remains unconfirmed, and microwave weapons are suspected to be a prime cause, this AI tool ‘TDAExplore’ could be used to study it. However, since this is a new tool and its effectiveness is as yet unproven, it may take time to reach any definitive conclusion.

Not only this, since the Coronavirus pandemic that World Health Organization (WHO) declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in January 2020, now has a new variant named ‘Omicron’, AI can be used to help health practitioners to study and manage the pandemic’s spread and impacts. A study from last summer describes how AI can optimally be used for pandemic preparedness and response. It finds that 59-92% lives in the US could have been saved if the pandemic had been managed effectively. It concludes that there were machine learning solutions for effective management of the pandemic but some of them were not optimally used in the pandemic’s early stages.

Moreover, regarding the identification of presence of COVID-19 in the human body, scientists at the University of West Scotland have found a way to detect COVID-19 using AI. This method involves X-rays of an infectious person and gives results quicker than the standard Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test and is claimed to be 98% effective. ‘The state-of-the-art technique utilises x-ray technology, comparing scans to a database of around 3000 images, belonging to patients with Covid-19, healthy individuals and people with viral pneumonia. It then uses an AI process known as deep convolutional neural network, an algorithm typically used to analyse visual imagery, to make a diagnosis.’ This method, once operational, will help quickly detect COVID-19 (faster than the 2-hr PCR) and can also ultimately help in curtailing the pandemic.

In the light of this, one can conclude that using AI applications in the health sector will not only help in diagnosis of pandemics such as COVID-19 but can also assist medical practitioners predict disease and damage outcome and longevity. However, the challenge is to ensure adoption of these applications in clinical practice, especially in South Asian settings.

Etfa Khurshid Mirza is a Researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. Her area of interest is warfare and emerging technologies. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Etfa Khurshid Mirza


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »