BJP's Hindutva Agenda

Since 2014, the horizon of Indian national politics has been dominated by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its agenda of religious nationalism, known as ‘Hindutva’, a term coined by V.D. Savarkar in 1923. While being in the country’s driving seat, BJP has employed the ideology of Hindutva, based on the postulates of right-wing extremism and exclusionary policies against minorities. It has won all the major electoral battles in the last nine years. However, it recently lost the only BJP-governed southern state, Karnataka, to its arch-rival Congress. This victory in the legislative assembly election has stimulated a debate about the fate of the ruling party in the next Lok Sabha election scheduled to be held in 2024.

According to some Indian political pundits, BJP’s defeat in Karnataka is a major setback to its Hindutva-driven hyper-nationalist political agenda which was the central theme of their election campaign. PM Narendra Modi led the campaign trail by attending 19 public rallies and roadshows with a focus on divisiveness – a hallmark of BJP’s electoral politics. The battleground of this campaign was paved with the outgoing government’s anti-Muslim policies, including  the ban on  hijab, abolishing the 4 percent reservation quota for Muslims  in academic and professional institutes, a controversial anti-conversion bill (making inter-faith marriages difficult), and a ban on the slaughter of cows. However, despite the invincible persona of Modi, curated by his Saffron Party, inflation, unemployment, and corruption of the BJP government handed the victory to Congress which kept indigenous issues at the forefront of its campaign.

Unfortunately, while the rejection by the local electorate of Karnataka towards the Hindu majoritarianism-induced election campaign of BJP may set the tone for the remaining state elections in the ongoing year, at the national level, the BJP’s popularity along with the Modi’s high approval rating remains intact. On the other hand, the overall morale of the Congress party has been boosted with their win in Himachal Pradesh and now in Karnataka, in a span of six months. Albeit the arena of state elections is quite different from contesting national elections. The policies related to the systematic persecution of minorities, especially Muslims, penetration of hyper-nationalism, and suppression of dissenting voices in media are some of the instruments that the BJP is using and would continue to use with full force, at the national front, to claim a third consecutive term. These Hindutva-driven policies are implemented by the ruling party to pander to their support base and divert them from more pressing issues, such as  widening economic disparity in India.

In the same vein, the current trajectory of governance of the BJP reflects that it is intensifying the already vulnerable fault lines of religious divisions and communal hatred to ramp up the agenda of keeping its support base engaged, ahead of elections. With Lok Sabha elections less than a year away, India’s political landscape is filled with voices that the BJP might pass a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the centre. It is one of the three core issues for the right-wing Hindu nationalists (the abrogation of Article 370 and construction of Ram Mandir have already been achieved). The UCC aims to establish a unified set of laws on divorce, marriage, and inheritance, regardless of religion. In a highly religious and polarised environment, implementation of this code would be detrimental to minorities. However, the quest to satisfy its ‘Sangh Parivar’ and win big in the upcoming elections may compel the BJP to go ahead with this complicated UCC.

Additionally, in its desperation to keep the flames of religious nationalism ignited, the BJP is actively using Bollywood as its propaganda tool. The poorly crafted and exaggerated storylines, painting Muslims in a bad light, are further fuelling hatred against the latter. The state-supported recent release of ‘The Kerala Stories’ (showing the fabricated story of 32000 women converting to Islam and joining ISIS); and the upcoming film  ‘72 Hoorain’ (depicting Islamophobia); and many other anti-Muslim movies lined up to be released before the national elections, are proof that state is tapping in the anti-Muslim sentiments for electoral gains. According to Naseeruddin Shah, a critically acclaimed Indian Muslim actor, the fashionable trend of hating Muslims in India is being cleverly exploited by the ruling BJP. He also lamented the inefficiency of the Indian election commission in stopping the use of religion to garner votes.

While the Congress party’s victory in Karnataka challenges the BJP’s anti-Muslim rhetoric, it would be naive to assume that this single outcome will automatically translate into success in the upcoming general elections. As the battle for India’s political future intensifies, it is yet to be seen how opposition parties present a formidable alternative to the BJP’s divisive policies. The task ahead is daunting, but it is crucial for the health of Indian democracy and the protection of minority rights. The true test lies in whether the opposition can effectively harness the aspirations and concerns of the people and offer a compelling vision for the once inclusive and pluralistic India. Only then can the forces of communal hatred be challenged, and the true spirit of a diverse nation be preserved.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »