BJP's Hindutva Agenda

Since 2014, the horizon of Indian national politics has been dominated by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its agenda of religious nationalism, known as ‘Hindutva’, a term coined by V.D. Savarkar in 1923. While being in the country’s driving seat, BJP has employed the ideology of Hindutva, based on the postulates of right-wing extremism and exclusionary policies against minorities. It has won all the major electoral battles in the last nine years. However, it recently lost the only BJP-governed southern state, Karnataka, to its arch-rival Congress. This victory in the legislative assembly election has stimulated a debate about the fate of the ruling party in the next Lok Sabha election scheduled to be held in 2024.

According to some Indian political pundits, BJP’s defeat in Karnataka is a major setback to its Hindutva-driven hyper-nationalist political agenda which was the central theme of their election campaign. PM Narendra Modi led the campaign trail by attending 19 public rallies and roadshows with a focus on divisiveness – a hallmark of BJP’s electoral politics. The battleground of this campaign was paved with the outgoing government’s anti-Muslim policies, including  the ban on  hijab, abolishing the 4 percent reservation quota for Muslims  in academic and professional institutes, a controversial anti-conversion bill (making inter-faith marriages difficult), and a ban on the slaughter of cows. However, despite the invincible persona of Modi, curated by his Saffron Party, inflation, unemployment, and corruption of the BJP government handed the victory to Congress which kept indigenous issues at the forefront of its campaign.

Unfortunately, while the rejection by the local electorate of Karnataka towards the Hindu majoritarianism-induced election campaign of BJP may set the tone for the remaining state elections in the ongoing year, at the national level, the BJP’s popularity along with the Modi’s high approval rating remains intact. On the other hand, the overall morale of the Congress party has been boosted with their win in Himachal Pradesh and now in Karnataka, in a span of six months. Albeit the arena of state elections is quite different from contesting national elections. The policies related to the systematic persecution of minorities, especially Muslims, penetration of hyper-nationalism, and suppression of dissenting voices in media are some of the instruments that the BJP is using and would continue to use with full force, at the national front, to claim a third consecutive term. These Hindutva-driven policies are implemented by the ruling party to pander to their support base and divert them from more pressing issues, such as  widening economic disparity in India.

In the same vein, the current trajectory of governance of the BJP reflects that it is intensifying the already vulnerable fault lines of religious divisions and communal hatred to ramp up the agenda of keeping its support base engaged, ahead of elections. With Lok Sabha elections less than a year away, India’s political landscape is filled with voices that the BJP might pass a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the centre. It is one of the three core issues for the right-wing Hindu nationalists (the abrogation of Article 370 and construction of Ram Mandir have already been achieved). The UCC aims to establish a unified set of laws on divorce, marriage, and inheritance, regardless of religion. In a highly religious and polarised environment, implementation of this code would be detrimental to minorities. However, the quest to satisfy its ‘Sangh Parivar’ and win big in the upcoming elections may compel the BJP to go ahead with this complicated UCC.

Additionally, in its desperation to keep the flames of religious nationalism ignited, the BJP is actively using Bollywood as its propaganda tool. The poorly crafted and exaggerated storylines, painting Muslims in a bad light, are further fuelling hatred against the latter. The state-supported recent release of ‘The Kerala Stories’ (showing the fabricated story of 32000 women converting to Islam and joining ISIS); and the upcoming film  ‘72 Hoorain’ (depicting Islamophobia); and many other anti-Muslim movies lined up to be released before the national elections, are proof that state is tapping in the anti-Muslim sentiments for electoral gains. According to Naseeruddin Shah, a critically acclaimed Indian Muslim actor, the fashionable trend of hating Muslims in India is being cleverly exploited by the ruling BJP. He also lamented the inefficiency of the Indian election commission in stopping the use of religion to garner votes.

While the Congress party’s victory in Karnataka challenges the BJP’s anti-Muslim rhetoric, it would be naive to assume that this single outcome will automatically translate into success in the upcoming general elections. As the battle for India’s political future intensifies, it is yet to be seen how opposition parties present a formidable alternative to the BJP’s divisive policies. The task ahead is daunting, but it is crucial for the health of Indian democracy and the protection of minority rights. The true test lies in whether the opposition can effectively harness the aspirations and concerns of the people and offer a compelling vision for the once inclusive and pluralistic India. Only then can the forces of communal hatred be challenged, and the true spirit of a diverse nation be preserved.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »