Kashmir_Article_pic

Kashmiri struggle and Indian repression appear to be defining elements of the disputed region. The Valley remains haunted by blood spilled ruthlessly over the years. Ever since independence in 1947, the attitude of every Indian government has been derogatory towards Jammu and Kashmir – be it Indian National Congress (INC) or Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). But now, with Narendra Modi in office, the situation has further exacerbated given that he has exploited the issue to strengthen his political base. Resultantly, an environment has been carved out where religion and ethnicity define the level of acceptance granted to citizens.

In such an atmosphere, Kashmiri identity is now categorised as foreign, rebellious and a threat to the state. Disregarding all human rights, Kashmiri Muslims continue to suffer at the hands of Indian hardliners. State terrorism is routinely practiced in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) where police harassment, lynching, torture, interrogations, arrests and detention have been accepted as a norm. There are extensive curbs on the media, massive censorship and lack of independent reporting. Anybody who speaks for their rights is forcefully and violently silenced. The Indian government strictly implements the notorious Public Safety Act (PSA) which allows detention for up to two years and deprivation of legal representation to the detainee. Any individual who tends to highlight the horrible conditions of Kashmiris or speaks out against the aggression is detained under this act.

Apart from on-ground assault on Kashmiris, its special status has been withdrawn after the abrogation of Article 370 on 5th August 2019 followed by a stringent lockdown which still remains in place. Demographic changes are being forcefully imposed in the region. The citizenship law under Article 35A stands null and void allowing Indians throughout the country to purchase property in IIOJK, avail scholarships and government jobs. Previously, only ‘permanent residents of the state’ had exclusive rights of ownership. The ultimate aim behind this move is to convert Muslim Kashmiri population into a minority and exhaust the movement.

It is equally disturbing that these crimes have been institutionalised in Indian state machinery which means that Kashmiris are subjected to brutal treatment and deliberate marginalisation by all strata of society. The classification of Kashmiri identity especially based on religion has turned a large segment of Indian society against them, inciting discriminatory behaviour and fuelling violence. Persistent silence of by state officials on these crimes is interpreted as an approval and has contributed to increased hostility not only in Kashmir but throughout India.

Crimes against humanity in IIOJK, by the Indian state and society, have reached such an extent that recently Stoke White, a UK based law firm demanded arrest of Indian Army Chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane as well as Home Minister Amit Shah. Gregory Stanton, founder of ‘Genocide Watch’ has also recently asserted that there is a potential of Muslim genocide in India. During a US Congressional Briefing, he warned that ‘clear signs and processes’ of a genocide are visible in India, particularly in Assam and IIOJK. In another interview, he drew parallels of India with Rwanda where similar events were witnessed before the genocide broke out. The most concerning aspect which he mentioned in his interview was that this genocide would be different from previous ones noting that it will not be carried out by the state. According to him, Indian citizens will be the ones executing it in the shape of mobs and it will be similar to the mob violence witnessed during the 1947 Partition.

Indeed, Stanton makes a very logical prediction and if it becomes a reality, it will be disastrous, particularly for Kashmiri Muslims. Given that Kashmiri Muslims are considered more alien and anti-state than other Muslim communities in India, they are significantly more prone to become targets of a potential genocide. In such circumstances, the state will only play an observatory role as seen in Gujarat where Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister when the notorious 2002 massacre transpired under his watch.

Like every year, Pakistan in its efforts to provide moral and diplomatic support, will observe Kashmir Solidarity Day on 5 February to draw international attention towards this pressing issue. It has become more important than ever to apprise the international community, particularly major powers, that they recognise and stop the horror which is taking place in Jammu and Kashmir on a daily basis, denounce the wrong-doings of the incumbent Indian government and take meaningful action in this regard. As a nation, we must contribute consistently towards this cause, individually and collectively. Pakistani citizens, media, think-tanks and the government should keep raising their voices for Kashmiris at domestic and international platforms to keep the issue alive and avert an impending genocide.

Shaza Arif is a researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source : Masroor, R.2021, “Kashmir fury at India’s plan to redraw voting map,” BBC News,December 23,https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-59737858


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »