US-China relations

The now-dubbed ‘Indo-Pacific’ region has emerged as a key focus of the United States’ (US) foreign policy, especially after the announcement of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy in 2019. In pursuit of this, the US is not only building multilateral alliances and partnerships but also encouraging bilateral intra-regional ones. Japan, India, and Australia are key US partners in the Indo-Pacific region. Revamping of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) and signing of the ‘Australia United Kingdom and the United States’ (AUKUS) pact in 2021 show that the US is quite keen to enhance its engagement with the regional countries.

In this regard, earlier this year on 6th January, 2022, Japan and Australia signed the ‘Facilitation of Reciprocal Access and Cooperation between the Self Defence Forces of Japan and Australian Defence Forces’, commonly known as the ‘Japan-Australia RAA’. The RAA aims to provide a framework for increased defence cooperation between the two countries in years to come. It is the first-ever defence cooperation agreement that would pave the way for interoperability between their militaries. The agreement is aimed at bolstering their security relations in the larger context of a secure and stable Indo-Pacific region. 

RAA is Japan’s first-ever agreement with any country besides the US with which it has had a mutual defence cooperation agreement known as the ‘Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security’ since 1960. As a result, the US forces are permanently deployed in Japan, including its 7th fleet which is based in Yokosuka.

Under RAA, a very special focus is given to the rapid deployment of Japanese and Australian forces. The scope of cooperation also includes working on defence and humanitarian support missions where both the countries agreed to work together to tackle regional security challenges. Some of the broader areas of cooperation as identified in the RAA also include strengthening government and business partnerships in the domains of clean energy and critical technologies and materials. Both countries also endorsed the significance of QUAD and seek to expand their cooperation with India and the US to promote stability and prosperity in the region. 

The Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison asserted that ‘this landmark treaty would open a new chapter of defence and security cooperation between two countries in the complex and rapidly changing world.’ Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, termed it as a ‘breakthrough’ and a ‘landmark’ agreement, under which security cooperation between the two sides would reach new heights.

The US has also recently launched its Indo-Pacific Trade Pact (IPTP) involving 12 countries of the Pacific region, including the QUAD countries. These countries account for 40% of the global GDP and aims to strengthen their economies against the backdrop of inflation in the region. It is worth mentioning that the main theme under which the two countries are building cooperation is the broader notion of a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’; an idea already glorified during the QUAD Summits of March and September 2021. In the 2022 QUAD Summit, which took place just recently in Japan, the key agenda was the increasing Chinese foothold in the region.

On the other hand,  the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson has maintained that the RAA cooperation should not harm the interests of a third party and that the ‘Pacific is not a place to make waves’. China has contested the US’ 2019 ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy and  maintained that it is bound to fail. Beijing has also been critical of the IPTP move and termed it a ‘political weapon’ of the US to ‘coerce the regional countries to take sides between China and the US on economic means.’

One may argue that revamping the QUAD mechanism, the AUKUS pact, the RAA between Japan and Australia and now the US’ latest Economic Pact suggest that the once Asia-Pacific region has now become more significant for international security than ever before. While the US, being a leading country in such arrangements, is quite keen to build and deepen regional alliances and partnerships, a definitive underlying reason is the fact that Washington sees Beijing as a dangerous strategic competitor.

Clearly, the US is expanding its influence in the Indo-Pacific region in various forms and dimensions. Its ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy’ is aimed at countering China. In this regard, the RAA is also in line with the QUAD and AUKUS arrangements and are all well-calculated signals to contain China. The major focus of the US is expanding its engagement with regional partners instead of having direct military confrontation with Beijing.

Haris Bilal Malik is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »