Zahra Niazi-Bucking the Buck-5 July 2024

Daniel McDowell, Bucking the Buck: US Financial Sanctions and the International Backlash against the Dollar (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2023)

Reviewed by Zahra Niazi

Daniel McDowell’s book Bucking the Buck: US Financial Sanctions and the International Backlash against the Dollar is a notable addition to the literature on the de-dollarisation trend and its underlying motives. In it, McDowell critically analyses the influence of the overuse of economic sanctions by the United States (US) on the dollar’s preeminent global status and the future efficacy of sanctions as a foreign policy tool. The book’s central thesis is that ‘US financial sanctions generate political risk, provoke anti-dollar policies among targets, and, in some cases, correlate with de-dollarisation,’ (p. 33).

In the opening chapters, the author reiterates how the dollar’s dominance as the international store of value and a medium of cross-border trade and transactions offers the US the unrivalled capacity to exercise influence against adversaries, including through financial sanctions (pp. 36-7). However, the overuse of sanctions as a tool of economic statecraft has implications for the dollar’s international attractiveness as both a cross-border medium of exchange and a reserve currency.

The ensuing chapters provide empirical evidence to corroborate the interrelation between US sanctions and the anti-dollar policies implemented by the targeted governments (pp. 95-242). By citing Russian and Turkish case studies, the author shows that US financial sanctions can contribute to not just the de-dollarisation of foreign exchange reserves but also a shift in the geographic distribution of financial assets (p. 131). The case study evidence is bolstered further by statistical models showing that gold reserves increase at a higher pace among the countries targeted by sanctions and those at risk of sanctions compared to low-risk or non-sanctioned states. Likewise, an association exists between sanctions and the reduction in foreign holdings of US Treasury bonds. In terms of the dollar’s role in cross-border payments, the author cites examples from Russia, Venezuela, and Turkey to show that sanctions can provoke targeted governments to lessen dependence on the dollar as a payment and trade settlement currency (pp. 184-242). The associated statistical evidence reveals that countries targeted by sanctions or those at risk of sanctions are more likely to reduce their dependence on the dollar as a trade settlement currency. Sanctioned countries also have a higher propensity to sign currency swap agreements, allowing cross-border trade settlement in currencies other than the dollar.

However, the author emphasises that the world is still far from a wholesale migration away from the dollar (p. 284). Reducing reliance on the dollar is not synonymous with decoupling from the currency, and no country can fully ‘sanction proof’ its economy. The dollar remains the ‘king’ of all currencies and will likely continue to hail its dominant status in the coming decades. One of its greatest strengths is the lack of a true rival to it. Beijing has attempted to establish an alternative payment system based on the Renminbi, i.e., the Cross-border Interbank Payment System. However, for this system to be able to insulate the world from Washington’s coercive tools effectively, China will have to disconnect it from the dollar and the existing communication and financial networks, which, McDowell asserts, is challenging (p. 42). Nevertheless, the persistent overuse of financial sanctions by the US could provoke China and the European Union (EU) to design a more robust set of policies to bring about a more significant change in the international monetary system’s competitive landscape. Towards the end of the book, he advises that Washington should consider a long-term view when designing or implementing sanctions policies, as overuse of sanctions can reduce their efficacy (pp. 362-3).

Bucking the Buck effectively answers some of the now frequently asked questions about the dollar’s role in the international trade and monetary system and where it may be headed. However, it would have been preferable had the author, while discussing the dollar’s rivals, deliberated more on the potential challenge to the dollar that the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) bloc could pose. The BRICS nations have an aggregate GDP that surpasses the G7’s (Canada, United States, Japan, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Italy) and account for more than 40 percent of the world population. While accelerated efforts to introduce a new reserve currency by the BRICS took place after the book’s publication at the beginning of 2023, some noteworthy developments occurred in the preceding period. Notably, during the 2022 BRICS Summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin categorically announced that the bloc was working to develop an international reserve currency. Additionally, talks between Riyadh and Beijing to price Saudi oil sales to China in yuan were also actively underway before the book’s publication. Hence, a detailed discussion on the petroyuan as a competitor to the petrodollar and its potential impact on shielding countries from Western sanctions would have been a worthwhile addition to the book.  

McDowell’s pointed critique of the US government’s excessive reliance on sanctions as a diplomatic tool, coupled with his skilful organisation of the book’s content and the use of comprehensive statistical models to support his arguments, make this work both commendable and insightful. The book effectively challenges prevalent assumptions that are often uncritically accepted, such as the rapid decline of the US dollar’s dominance or the immediate readiness of viable alternatives. It provides a nuanced exploration of de-dollarisation and its underlying dynamics, making it an essential read for those seeking a balanced and well-informed perspective on this complex issue.

Zahra Niazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].   


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »