Parallel universe stock markets

It came as something of a shock that the S&P 500 index, a supposed bellwether of the American economy, attained a level on June 8th 2020 that was so high it effectively erased any sign of the losses borne due to coronavirus (Covid-19) in earlier months.

In other words, the stock market had soared to such an extent that it had returned to a status before the rampant deaths of coronavirus, the concomitant paralysis of economic lockdown, and the breakdown of civil society following mass uprisings against American police brutality.

For die-hard believers in the financial markets, the “Free Market Taliban” as they might be called, the rising stock markets might suggest that there are really no problems in the United States, and that the virus has already fizzled away, a restive population has been calmed, and workers have a skip in their stride on their way back to the office.

Is this really the tone-deaf message that the stock markets intend to give? Are American cities really no longer smouldering from fires and teargas? Has the country with the highest number of coronavirus cases and deaths simply willed the virus out of existence?

What is this parallel universe in which the American stock market resides? Recent interviews with market gurus show many of them shrugging their shoulders with smirks of befuddlement. But the bizarro-world of American finance may in fact represent something much more nuanced. Three explanations can be posited for the resurgent markets, each of which is flimsy in its own manner.

The first and most straightforward is that recent data simply isn’t as horrific as analysts expected, and although this cannot explain the complete recouping of stock market losses, it harkens to the point that capitalists were yearning for any piece of news to jump back into the equity asset class.

One example of this was the recent US jobs report which observed a net increase of +2.5 million jobs instead of the dismal forecast of -8 million job losses. This naturally reflects the opening up of states at a time when coronavirus continues to rage and 100,000+ deaths have occurred in the US.

The second explanation is that the behemoth and outsized stimulus released by the Federal Reserve constitutes a cash infusion so large that financial institutions will be forced to spend it somehow, and will choose equities over the low (and negative) returns of bonds. Since they will have to find some avenue to spend the money conjured out of thin air, the equity markets are not representative of American reality but rather the need to do something with excess cash.

Naturally, the best use of that conjured cash would be in the pockets of the suffering masses who have been furloughed or laid off. But their wellbeing has been a priority for the Trump administration in nothing but rhetoric.

The third rationale is that the S&P 500 is no longer reflective of American life in any meaningful sense. 20% of the S&P is comprised of the five tech giants: Apple, Microsoft, Google (Alphabet), Amazon, and Facebook. These tech giants have been making a killing during the pandemic, delivering services that have not just continued but in fact grown during the lockdown.

These five giants thus have a disproportionate effect on the equity indices, and this hardly constitutes a microcosm of American life as much as it symbolizes the monopolization of American capital. The parallel universe in which American finance now dwells is as virtual as the companies that dominate the indices, bereft of any connection to raging protests, pandemic outbreaks, or the brutality of a police state.

On a final note, it is worth heeding the tension that persists at the level that the S&P has achieved, with some negative pressure since June 8th, based on sobering news from the Federal Reserve expecting a -6.5% contraction in the economy. That counter-point of sobriety is a thin strand that keeps American finance from fully residing in an entirely different universe.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »