Indian_Democracy_(1)

Since its independence, India has followed a path in which democracy was merely a slogan rather than the strength of the society. The journey of Indian society from Sangh Parivaar to a character like Yogi Adityanath shows the rapid trend of decay of democracy in India. This gradual decay worsened when the current Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government infused the concept of Hindu nationalism into Indian polity and is now building a ‘Hindu Rashtra’.

Since 2019 under BJP’s second term and its extremist polices democracy has further eroded. Narendra Modi used the weapon of parliamentary majority to implement controversial amendments in the Indian Constitution like abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A and the discriminatory Citizenship (Amendment) Act of 2019 which made many citizens alien in their very own country. The main target in both cases were Muslims.

The Modi government also amended the 1967 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and used it for political revenge across the country. The law authorizes that any citizen can be labelled a terrorist without producing any evidence. The clause of denial of bail has forced individuals to spend months and years in prison without even being found guilty.

A 2021 report by Freedom House, a pro-democracy and non-profit organisation based in the United States, highlighted in its annual evaluation that India’s status had fallen from free to partly free in the year 2020 because of the policies adopted by the BJP government and its allies. Also, stringent measures against Muslims, media, academics, and civil society groups to pursue Hindu nationalist policies were other major causes of this decline. In addition to this, other factors included killing of Muslims in communal violence and protests in Delhi, charging students, journalists and citizens under criminal laws on speaking against government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic surge. In September 2020, Hindu extremists, involved in demolishing the historic Babri Masjid in 1992, were set free by a special court. The current government showed inclination towards building a Hindu temple on the disputed site.

Indeed when we talk about human rights, religious freedom, political rights and economic rights, fascist mentality and sham democracy has downgraded Indian electoral democracy to autocracy. The new farm laws by the authoritative BJP government were an attempt to compel farmers to sell directly to food processing markets and abolish the old method of state- controlled fixed price method. This would have directly led to lowering prices and the income of producers. In response to this, tens of thousands of farmers and peasants initiated tractor rallies and put the Red Fort under siege on 22nd January, 2021 – India’s 72nd National Day – to expose the draconian laws and suppressive policies of the Indian state. This was just another indication of BJP’s mentality of crushing the lower-class Hindus and minorities with stringent laws.

Similarly, the abrogation of articles 370 and 35A creates grave implications for regional security and stability. By such revocation, India is bringing demographic changes in IIOJK by turning the Muslim majority states into Hindu majority ones. This will alter the political, social, cultural and religious fabric of the society in IIOJK. Moreover, obliterating the Human Rights Commission in IIOJK, introduction of new domicile laws, implementation of new media policy and new land laws is an attempt to ‘Hindutvatize’ the region by extreme nationalist policies.

Contrary to its fake claims of being the world’s largest democracy, growing economy and champions of freedom, India is a classic example of a sham democracy, with a weak economy that deprives people of their basic civil rights. With the death of democracy, fascism rises. The problems with the health of Indian democracy lies in its compromise of civil liberties and democratic norms. No one will come to rescue deteriorating Indian democracy until a change is triggered from inside and this will unlikely happen till the BJP-led government is in power in India. Without such a change, India will remain a democracy in name only.

Asad Ullah Khan is a Senior Researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Chowdhury Debashish Roy, 2020. “Analysis | What’s killing India’s democracy? It’s not just Modi who’s to blame.” South China Morning Post. March, 2020. 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »