This study assesses the cost of the Russo-Ukrainian war for Ukraine from a financial and economic perspective. From February 2022 to December 2024, Ukraine’s war-related cost is estimated at a minimum of approximately USD 370 billion. This figure includes the costs associated with GDP losses (lower-end estimate), destruction of physical and natural capital, and financial capital losses reflected in declining market capitalisation. To put this into perspective, this is more than the amount (over USD 220 billion) spent on rebuilding Iraq between 2003 and 2014, as well as the amount, i.e., USD 141 billion, spent by the United States government on reconstruction in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2021. The entire cost of Syria’s reconstruction was also estimated to be anywhere between USD 250 billion and USD 400 billion in 2021. Second, Ukraine’s government spending has surged dramatically, with defence expenditures alone rising by an extraordinary 794.6% in 2022. Although any specific expenditure amount cannot be classified as a direct and immediate cost for the Ukrainian government due to the heavy reliance on external budget financing, including grants and loans, during these years, loans have constituted a larger share of external support, reflecting a cost of war deferred to the future. Beyond the debtservicing costs, the country faces other long-term financial commitments, including recovery and reconstruction needs (amounting to USD 524 billion from 2025 to 2035), higher defence spending requirements for a prolonged period, and social security needs to support veterans and war-affected citizens. Only through a lasting peace can Ukraine fully unlock its economic potential and rebuild a resilient and growth-driven economy.

Share this article
Golden Dome: Capabilities and Constraints
In an era of novel threats, a layered defensive shield is once again at the centre of US strategy. The announcement of the Golden Dome by President Trump shortly after assuming office has given rise to new expectations, questions, and concerns regarding the project.
The capability is envisioned as a comprehensive missile shield for the continental United States (CONUS) against ballistic missiles, hypersonic vehicles, cruise missiles, and UAVs. Conceived as a multi-tiered system, it aims to integrate existing missile defences with new space-based platforms. The layered system, combining land, sea and space-based sensors
Trump’s Coercive Diplomacy: America’s Harder Turn
President Donald Trump renamed the Department of Defense (DOD) to the Department of War in September 2025. Then, just a month later, he threatened at least three countries with war. Trump’s economic war was waged on most states, in the form of tariffs, from the day he assumed office, but the threats and signalling toward an armed confrontation have been growing more frequent and explicit.
Do India- Bangladesh Relations Signal a New Strategic Front?
Amidst transforming regional security dynamics, India reinforced its eastern flank by establishing three fully operational military stations at strategic points around the ‘Siliguri Corridor’ near the India-Bangladesh border. The new bases include the Lachit Borphukan Military Station near Dhubri in Assam along with two forward bases at Chopra in West Bengal and Kishanganj in Bihar. Indian Army also reviews a fourth station in Mizoram as part of extended defence arc around the Siliguri corridor. Amidst deteriorating ties with Bangladesh, India’s fortification of its eastern

