03. Shaza Arif-AI-Chi-Alpha-Oped thumbnail-March-2025-AP

Nine years ago, between March 9th and 15th, 2016, the world witnessed a historic match between accomplished Go player Lee Sedol and AlphaGo, an AI model developed by DeepMind. In a five-round series, AlphaGo defeated Lee Sedol 4-1, a result that not only challenged long-standing assumptions about human strategic supremacy but also signalled a pivotal advancement in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology. The famous 4000-year-old game is known for its inherent complexity with an infinite number of moves. Prowess over the game extends beyond computation limits. AlphaGo’s victory demonstrated that AI could not only match human intelligence in complex tasks but also surpass it in scenarios that require reasoning and creativity. This landmark event catalyzed broader debates about the future role of AI in complex decision-making and strategic contexts.

As we mark the 9th anniversary of the match, it is the perfect moment to look at today’s state of AI technology. Over the past decade, AI has not only advanced at a breathtaking pace but has also redefined our understanding of machine learning and cognitive computation. The global market size of AI is expected to reach USD 3,680.47 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 19.20% from 2025 to 2034.  Today, both public and private sectors are extensively using AI for numerous applications ranging from supply chain optimisation, agriculture, education, healthcare, finance to manufacturing. Moreover, the basic principle underlying AlphaGo, i.e. reinforcement learning, continues to be a driving force behind numerous advancements that we see today.

Much like AlphaGo changed the game of Go in 2016, today’s language learning models, ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek etc, are redefining creative writing, artistic expression, and image formation. They generate human-like content with an efficiency and nuance that pushes the boundaries of traditional creativity. Digital assistants such as Bixby, Alexa and Siri continue to manage daily tasks with considerable ease – with enhanced versions equipped with personalised responses, growing contextual awareness and automation. Similarly, robotics and autonomous cars have made advancements with minimal human involvement. Companies such as Waymu, Tesla and Baidu are constantly in a race to provide enhanced autonomous features to users. Google, Amazon and Microsoft are also leading innovation and entrepreneurship at breakneck speed. By late 2024, nearly 245  AI unicorns had emerged, demonstrating the potential of the technology

Governments are also making significant investments, with the United States (US) and China leading the race at an accelerated pace. In this context, AI is being perceived as a key driver of influence. Notable advancements have been made in the military domain, particularly in data optimisation, Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR), and precision strikes. Likewise, autonomous drones have demonstrated their utility in recent conflicts such as Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia-Ukraine, manifesting their pronounced impact in future warfare.

Unfortunately, progress on AI regulation remains limited. While frameworks like the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), EU Artificial Intelligence Act, and Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence have taken initial steps, the lack of global consensus has stalled the development of cohesive, uniform rules. For instance, GDPR fines are projected to reach nearly Euro 5.88 billion by 2025, and recent refusal by the US and United Kingdom (UK) to sign the proposed agreement at the Paris AI Action Summit only deepens concerns over the future trajectory of AI governance.

The regulatory challenges are compounded by issues of AI bias, potential job displacement, and global race for supremacy, all of which dominate corporate and policy discussions. This has become even more pronounced since the associated cost of AI technology is also decreasing at a rapid pace, making it more accessible to a range of entities, from small startups to governments. A recent survey reveals that nearly 41% of companies are likely to downsize their workforce highlighting economic uncertainties posed by rapid technological change.

The black-box nature of AlphaGo was a central aspect of discussion following its victory. This characteristic raises several questions regarding transparency and accountability in AI’s decision-making. Today, we see more advancements towards exploring Explainable AI to develop understandable and transparent models, with potential market size expected to grow to 20.9% by 2028.

The next decade is likely to witness the emergence and proliferation of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI). Such advancements would require robust regulatory measures and frameworks of collaboration to overcome potential threats, prevent misuse and ensure safe use. The technological race could see new alliances and shifting geopolitics vis-a-vis AI superpowers. In future, quantum breakthroughs may also compound AI applications. 6G technology could begin to take shape and the Internet of Things (IoT) is sure to expand – introducing new contours to AI integration.

However, like the legendary AlphaGo vs. Lee Sedol match, advancements in AI compel us to reflect on the essence of what makes us human. In that game, Sedol’s celebrated move No. 78 momentarily outmanoeuvred AlphaGo, serving as a powerful reminder that the human mind, with its capacity for intuition, creativity and emotion, continues to defy even the most sophisticated algorithms. Although the match concluded within a week, its legacy endures, challenging us to explore how we might responsibly shape the rise of AI through innovative and ethical measures that preserve the irreplaceable qualities of human thought and ingenuity.

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. The article was initially published in The News International.She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »