The history of Pakistan and India is marred with enduring rivalry. In the last seven decades, the two neighbours have been embroiled in full-fledged wars and limited conflicts. With a Hindutva-inspired regime in power for nearly a decade, an aggressive anti-Pakistan narrative has been a key facet of its policy framework. The findings of this research reveal that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) benefits from this anti-Pakistan narrative and military adventurism. These activities help flare up nationalist sentiments, divert attention from critical domestic issues and materialise into favourable outcomes in elections. With General Elections in India in 2024, there is an increased likelihood that the Indian leadership may seek to leverage its political standing by taking military action aimed at Pakistan as it has done in the past. These manoeuvres could significantly undermine future bilateral relations and threaten regional stability. In such a context, Pakistan must remain cognizant of these trends and be prepared to address any threats that may arise due to aggressive Indian behaviour.
Share this article
Conflicted Calculations: When Strategic Decisions Aren’t Strategic at All
Perhaps the most consequential aspect of any military campaign or national policy is strategic planning. Unfortunately, these decisions are often driven by ideological and political motives rather than reason
Smuggling by Sky: The New Way Terrorists Move Supplies
Necessity is a dark cloud which tends to give birth to innovation in the turbulent arenas of contemporary conflicts. Having said that, a very low profile yet dramatic change is underway in the airspace of conflict zones, which is being used by terrorist and insurgent groups using commercial unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
UNSC’s Unique Paralysis
In the recorded history of international relations, institutions rarely fail outright. Instead, they become irrelevant. Contrary to popular belief, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is not collapsing due to the weight of idealism or bureaucratic inertia.
