covid

As the government, private businesses, civil society, and the public at large grapple with the emerging pandemic situation across the country, an important debate has evolved in many circles regarding the degree to which the scourge of coronavirus (Covid19) might impact the Pakistani economy.

It is a cursory deduction to state that the impact will be severe and large, but it is important, even in the midst of a fluid situation, to try to assess the possible economic scenarios given the “pre-existing conditions” of our limited fiscal space, declining economic activity, exogenous pressures, and constrained resources.

To address the question in a more comprehensive manner, we constructed an aggregate expenditure model of the national economy to examine the various levers of economic activity and how vulnerable each might be to a corona contagion at multi-durational intervals of three, six, and twelve months.

Our findings were that annual GDP for the current fiscal year (FY20) might shrink by -5% year-on-year, and the final quarter (until June 2020) could contract by -10% on a quarter-to-quarter basis. This does not differ too much from other recent attempts at modelling other countries’ economies, including the United States, where quarter-on-quarter declines are estimated in the range of 8-13%.

The impacts on the following fiscal year (FY21) would be more contentious and dependent on the duration of the global and local coronavirus outbreak. A six-month extended fallout would delay economic recovery in the next fiscal year and lead to GDP contraction of -2% year-on-year in FY21, while a full-blown 12-month economic debacle (given international deflationary sluggishness and the prolonged time to a Covid19 vaccine) could set the FY21 GDP for a further -10% contraction.

Looking at the national economy, given that consumption accounts for 80% of national expenditure, it was important to disaggregate the cyclical components from the essential. The average Pakistani household spends 40% of monthly income on food and 20% on housing and utilities. Attending to food security requirements would thus be paramount, as PM Imran Khan’s judicious corona stimulus program recognizes.

We laid an emphasis in the model on the essential driver of expenditure and income: unemployment. Unemployment is the underlying determinant of the common man’s ability to eke out a living, and the daily wage class, many tens of millions of workers in size, must be attended to urgently in this regard.

While this is at the core of the government’s corona stimulus program, there is also an important role for the charitable spirit of our people and civil-society philanthropy in assuring continued food security in these trying times. In the model, for the cyclical element of monthly expenditures, including restaurants, travel etc. we modelled a near-complete short-term shut down.

Government expenditures were re-adjusted in our model in accordance with the magnitude of the announced stimulus program (Rs. 1.2 trillion). But another important aspect of expenditures, domestic and foreign debt servicing, also stood out as an issue of pressing import. As PM Imran Khan has rightly pointed out, this is an opportune time for the world (and particularly for the IMF & Paris Club) to recognize the importance of debt forgiveness to alleviate the pressures that developing countries already face.

We modelled degrees of uncertainty in private investment, which would be compensated for to a slight extent by public investment under the stimulus; albeit insufficiently so. The larger problem with private capital formation would be in the declining internal and external demand that the coronavirus lockdowns would entail.

This is where the question of exports and imports arose in the model. Given the disproportionate size of the textile group (from the cotton yarn through to finished apparels and linens) in our export make up, we drew upon recent observations from the Bangladesh economy, where the cancellation of international orders is decimating the industry. Up to 1.2 million jobs directly and 4 million jobs indirectly (in addition to 13% of GDP) are being affected in Bangladesh, as international end-user retail demand is thoroughly compressed.

Foreign remittances would also be hampered in this regard, given that our diaspora would face income constraints from labour difficulties under foreign lockdowns. This economic lifeline would thus be strangled acutely. In addition, greater pressure would befall the Rupee as investors would seek a general flight-to-safety in the dollar and emerging markets would be paid short shrift.

On the import side, we modelled some relief from the collapsing oil prices, driven by the Saudi-Russian oil price war. This is one silver lining for oil-importing countries, but oil price alleviation and larger import compression would still not compensate for export-side challenges given our narrow base of exported items.

As such, a grim picture emerged from our model for the immediate term fallout of coronavirus on the economy (in FY20). However, the duration of its socioeconomic effects would be the ultimate determinant of performance in the upcoming year (FY21), which would be driven even more so by exogenous recovery (particularly the US and China) than by local exigencies.

Pakistan is particularly indicative of the anticipated hardships that developing countries face since its economy was already in limbo before Covid19 was contracted by humans. Despite that, the Pakistani government has mobilized an action plan and arranged a stimulus program that, despite its modest size, may help to alleviate at least some of the pressure faced by the economy.

The challenges that Covid19 poses for the global economy will only be resolved by prioritizing the public health aspect of the pandemic, and a concerted effort to address imbalances in the world economy while encouraging more sustainable growth going forward. The post-pandemic world must be a better place than the one in which the virus descended.

Pakistan is a raft adrift in an ocean of turbulence, but maintaining strong anti-contagion measures (self-isolation, hygiene), assisting the financially destitute, implementing a proactive pro-poor stimulus, and keeping our heads high while bracing for the challenge ahead, all are of the utmost importance.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in The Nation newspaper. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »