NSP

A nation without clearly defined direction according to its national values will surely face existential threats in the contemporary world. Pakistan, for the first time in its history, has been able to chart a course that was first decided, owned and willingly followed by its people under the National Action Plan of 2014.The current National Security Policy of Pakistan (NSP) 2022-2026 can be termed as National Action Plan Plus for three main reasons: First, it is a consensus document on which both civil and military leadership agree. Also, the focus groups conducted by the National Security Division in different public and private sector universities and with civil society makes it a comprehensive policy document. Second, this policy has its own implementation strategy/ mechanism that was missing in all previous documents except National Action Plan. Third, the policy by suggesting a framework for national cohesion, economic security and human security has a whole-of-society approach, and if implemented in its true spirit can change the fate of Pakistan.

Comparatively, this policy is different from the National Action Plan as that was more security- oriented. However, this policy places geo-economics at its core rather than geopolitics. Also because of the evolving nature of non-traditional security threats and changing global contemporary security environment, it is a dire need to consider such threats on priority just like traditional security threats.

The NSP encompasses following important areas vis-à-vis traditional security, economic security and human security, i.e. a comprehensive stratagem to establish a sustainable institutional setup to strengthen the very basis of the state itself which will further strengthen socioeconomic conditions and physical security of the masses in general and the economy in particular. The geo-economic setup under the policy is intended towards projects which are more concentrated on regional connectivity and, thus, seems to be more pragmatic in terms of economic stability and development.

Historically, we have witnessed many policies fail only because there was no implementation mechanism, or a confidential mechanism was placed. In such a scenario, overcoming cross-cutting challenges in different domains and creating synergy and cohesion among various government ministries and departments will be tough. Similarly, because of confidentiality of the NSP’s implementation, there will be no monitoring and evaluation phase and the improvements required in the policy may be hard to incorporate. This will raise questions about its effectiveness and success.

The shift from geopolitics to geo-economics is much needed but ignoring the former will not be in the interest of Pakistan. The fluid situation in Afghanistan and US’ changing policies towards India and the region should be considered in this regard. Indian involvement in Afghanistan is a geostrategic challenge that Pakistan has to face and deal with for its security. Similarly, the US policies in Asia-Pacific and its tilt towards India is concerning. US’ unending reservations about Chinese projects such as China-Pakistan Economic Corridor shows that for Pakistan both geo-economics and geostrategic challenges are of immense importance and a systematic pursuance of both the strategies is the need of the hour.

The 2022-26 NSP is an attempt to recognise and prepare for emerging trends, technological revolution and to take advantage of its geo-economically pivotal location to function as a trade and connectivity hub for ensuring economic security. Economic gains will transform the internal security landscape of Pakistan by contributing to human security and welfare of the people. This will also contribute towards peace and prosperity in the region by increasing economic interdependence. Embracing a comprehensive vision stated in the policy, will lead us to a more secure and prosperous Pakistan where all citizens will be able to live with security and dignity.

Asad Ullah Khan is a Senior Researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Hussani, Muhammad Bakir Raza. 2022. ”Read Pakistan’s first ever National Security Policy here.” The Nation. January, 15. 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »