Standoff in the Himalayas
Author Name: Sitara Noor 02 Jun 2020 India

The latest military standoff between China and India at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the Eastern Ladakh and Sikkim region is one of the most serious military developments between the two Asian neighbours.
Starting with a faceoff early this month leading to sporadic fistfights, it has culminated into a military standoff in Ladakh's Galwan valley. The developing situation is unprecedented as China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has moved into the territory claimed by India especially in Galwan river valley and Pangong Tso lake. Reportedly, the PLA has captured a significant area, with almost 10,000 PLA soldiers and heavy machinery on the ground, thereby changing the territorial status quo.
While small-scale intrusions were a routine matter in the region, the recent Chinese action seems to be more assertive in approach, aggressive in nature and calculated by design. The initial silence from New Delhi and its desperate attempts to downplay the PLA’s advancements clearly manifested confusion and inability to deal with the situation in an effective manner. In stark contrast to India’s shrieking jingoism against Pakistan during the Pulwama/Balakot crisis, New Delhi’s muted response to Chinese advances is a clear sign that the Indian government is already making space for some offramps.
Since the 1962 Sino-India war in the Aksai region, China and India have displayed extreme caution and mutual restraint in dealing with their border issues. The signing of the Border Peace and Tranquility Agreement (BPTA) in 1993 was considered a major step in transforming the LAC into a normal border. Later, under the 2005 Protocol on Modalities for Implementing Confidence-Building Measures and the 2013 Border Defence Cooperation Agreement, both countries agreed to follow certain protocols for border patrolling to avoid any clash.
The latest development at the LAC is a major shift from previous patterns in terms of intensity and magnitude. According to some Indian analysts, this shows China’s attempt to be more assertive in pursuing its territorial claims in all contested areas. However, Indian government sources are consciously avoiding a reference to the larger pattern debate and calling it merely a Chinese attempt to deflect global attention from the alleged poor handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.
From the Chinese perspective, however, the action seems to be a direct consequence of India’s unilateral revocation of Article 370 in 2019 and the formation of Ladakh as a Union Territory, followed by massive construction of road links. The latest Chinese advances are seemingly meant to undercut the utility of India’s new road infrastructure and to provide the PLA with a strategic edge over Indian military positions in the region.
Notwithstanding the serious nature of the current crisis and persistent risk of an inadvertent escalation, it is highly unlikely that India and China will enter a major confrontation. There seems to be a clear realization in China that engaging India militarily may offer some short-term tactical value, but it may put China’s strategic objectives at risk, be it its military objective in the South China Sea or the regional connectivity through its flagship Belt and Road initiative.
Pakistan is not indifferent to what is happening at the LAC, especially at a time when its own situation with India at the Line of Control (LoC) is extremely tense. However, there is visible caution in Pakistan’s behaviour, aimed to rule out any possibility of initiating India’s proverbial two-front war scenario by opening another front, either to help China or to wrestle away Kashmir. On the contrary, there is a serious concern that after having failed to take any significant action against China, India may redirect its anger towards Pakistan and initiate a military offensive at the LoC under the pretext of a false flag operation, to ward off growing psychological pressure and humiliation faced by the Indian military.
Recent statements from China, India and the US indicate the onset of a potential de-escalation process. Notwithstanding a mutual willingness to de-escalate, it would be quite challenging to determine the original provocateur in this crisis who should hold the onus to act first. In this regard, a potential end of hostilities may lead to the following four scenarios.
First, a stalemate with a looming risk of inadvertent future escalation. Second, acceptance of fait accompli with no further risk of escalation. Third, enforcing a status quo ante, and fourth, escalating horizontally to de-escalate vertically – the aggrieved party may open a new front to have a better bargaining position and also to gain some face-saving.
Furthermore, regardless of the outcome, the crisis has brought to surface important dynamics for future consideration. One, it has exposed India’s inability to engage China militarily, thereby further eroding India’s purported position as the net security provider in the region. This will result in a propaganda campaign from India nonetheless, portraying India as capable of standing up to the dragon’s awakening. Second, even if the current hostilities were managed successfully, recurrent tensions would be a new normal in the region as the grievances of the parties are likely to outlive any temporary solution. The US-China competition will also intensify and continue to add more heat.
Third, it will put a strain on India to choose one of the two different roles it is playing simultaneously – exercise hedging or claim strategic autonomy, placing it more centrally in any future US-China confrontation. Fourth, Pakistan will have to remain vigilant and beef up its alert level at the LoC as well as the international border, as India may escalate at the LoC and even target Gilgit-Baltistan to seek Chinese de-escalation at the LAC. Pakistan will have to show resolve to carry out its stated policy of Quid Pro Quo Plus if it becomes a target of India’s misplaced anger.
Lastly, in view of growing American presence in the region and the blurring line between competition and confrontation, China will have to reassess its cooperative security policy as a tool to advance its interest in the region.
The writer is a senior research associate at the Centre forAerospace and Security Studies. This article was first published in The News newspaper. She can be reached at cass.thinkers@gmail.com.
Recent Articles
- Indian Acquisition of S-400 and US Sanctions: To Be or Not to Be Read more
- Hindutva: BJP’s Anti–Secular Agenda Read more
- PAF and its Modus Operandi Read more
- The Missile Incident and Indian Misinformation Read more
- Indo-US Partnership: Implications for Pakistan Read more
- Saffron Terror: India’s Approach towards Minorities Read more
- India’s Radioactive Bazaar Read more
- Was it Really an Accident? Read more
- Hindu Rashtra: From RSS to BJP Read more
- Ukraine Crisis: India Walking a Tightrope between Kremlin and Washington Read more
- Fascism in India and Silence of the American Government Read more
- Will India contain China? Lessons for the US Read more
- Eroding Indian Democracy Read more
- Military Alliances versus Economic Cooperation Read more
- Regional Implications of BECA between US and India Read more
- Indian Festivities over the S-400 Air Defense System Read more
- The Plight of Indian Muslims: On and Off the Pitch Read more
- The Honour for the Dishonoured Read more
- Unfolding Crisis Involving India’s Nuclear Program Read more
- The Rise and Fall of Indian Secularism Read more
- Rivalries in the Indian Armed Forces Read more
- India’s Dangerous Designs Read more
- Indian Military Procurements: A Scandalous Affair Read more
- Cocktail of Islamophobia and Misogyny in India Read more
- The Sick Man of Asia Read more
- On Trade with India Read more
- All Hands Count Read more
- Strategy of Stage Management Read more
- The S-400 Deal: Will India be able to Balance Relations with Russia and the US? Read more
- Indian Military Modernisation: Response Options for Pakistan Air Force Read more
- COVID-19 Lessons from our Neighbor Read more
- BJP Rule and its Impact on Indian Society Read more
- Modi’s Peace Overture: Genuine or a Trojan Horse? Read more
- What Our Elders Knew Read more
- India’s Balakot Strike: An Analysis Read more
- Unchecked India: A Threat to Peace Read more
- Protesting Farmers and the Indian Agrarian System Read more
- The Hindutva Rate of Growth Read more
- Why the S 400 would not Serve India’s Purpose? Read more
- The Abettors of Rage Read more
- India’s Military Modernization: A Risk to Strategic Equilibrium Read more
- India – A Restless Revisionist State Read more
- Unfolding the Indian Strategy Read more
- Standoff in the Himalayas Read more
- India Falters Amidst the Pandemic Read more
- Coronavirus May Have Exposed India’s Economic Fault Lines Read more
- Towards “The End of India”! Read more
- Pulwama attack: What Compelled Modi to Employ the Air Option? Read more
- The Decade of Dying Secularism in India Read more
- India's Rising Majoritarianism Read more
- India-Pakistan Crises and Nuclear Escalation Dynamics Read more
- Reviewing the Brotherhood in Saffron Read more
- The Underlying Political Deception of BJP in India Read more
- The Myth of Indian Democracy Read more
- Pakistan's response compulsion to India Read more
- Pulwama aftermath; Call to sanity Read more