Pulwama attack: What Compelled Modi to Employ the Air Option?
Author Name: Maham S. Gillani 28 Feb 2020 India

On February 14 last year, a native of the Pulwama district in Indian Occupied Kashmir, Adil Dar rammed a vehicle laden with explosives into the convoy of Indian Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), killing close to 40 security personnel. Shortly after the attack, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) claimed responsibility in a video released on social media. The attack has been deemed one of the deadliest terrorist incidents on Indian forces in decades.
In only two weeks following the Pulwama attack, relations between the two states deteriorated rapidly leading to one of the most dangerous escalations between India and Pakistan witnessed since the Kargil conflict in 1999. Ultimately, on February 26, 2019 Indian jets penetrated inside Pakistani territory and claimed to target an alleged terrorist camp. Notwithstanding reports of international media and watchdog bodies that confirmed the fact that India had only struck a barren piece of land and the strike caused limited damage, Modi overstated the damage of the attack.
While Modi’s decision to employ military for political objectives, exaggeration of the damage caused by the attack and subsequent false claims of victory can be attributed to several factors inter alia showcase India’s military might, use it as a scoring point in the campaign for upcoming elections and curry favor domestically, it is also noteworthy to mention that this was the first time since the 1971 war that India used airpower to strike Pakistan beyond Kashmir.
In order to comprehend Modi’s reckless decision of employing airpower and engaging in a high-stakes game of brinkmanship, it is important to shed light on Diversionary War Theory. The theory suggests that “political elites often embark on adventurous foreign policy or even resort to war in order to distract popular attention away from internal social and economic problems and consolidate their own domestic political support.” It is in this context that Modi decided to embark on a military adventure, employ airpower and engage in a high stakes game of brinkmanship.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi was embroiled in controversy around one of the India’s largest arms purchase contracts: a whopping 7.8 billion euro weapons deal to purchase 36 Rafale fighter planes from France. He was accused of bypassing institutions and procedures for defence acquisitions, causing a massive loss to public exchequer, compromising national security, using the multibillion arms deal to offer a remunerative contract to a billionaire ally and covering up corruption by refusing to reveal the pricing details.
Modi had risen to power after pillorizing Mr. Gandhi’s dynastic Congress party, depicting it as corrupt and offering himself and his Bharatiya Janata Party as the clean and corruption-free alternative. But after the Rafale scandal broke out, the Indian opposition was able to successfully frame the arms deal as the Modi’s grand corruption scandal. The Balakot strikes helped his government deflect attention from the Rafale scandal that had greatly tarnished his image as an honest leader.
Another reason was the growing frustration of the Modi government vis-à-vis Kashmir. Notwithstanding the unbridled freedom given to the Indian armed forces to imprison, torture, arrest and kill scores of defenceless Kashmiris, they were unable to stifle the cries of freedom in the valley. The ruthless killing of the freedom fighter, BurhanWani, further emboldened the freedom movement, adding to the pressure on Modi government. Voices were being raised from within Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) critical of the Modi government’s handling of Kashmir issue. An aerial strike in retaliation to Pulwama attack served as a means to release public pressure and frustration built by the situation in Kashmir.
Most importantly, Modi wanted to assert India’s image of a great power that can easily violate a weaker adversary’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He also tried to set a ‘new normal’ laced with hegemonic aggression by clearing an Indian Air Force (IAF) offensive against Pakistan. This kind of behaviour is only exhibited by big powers, for instance the US, who routinely target weaker states in this fashion. However, India’s miscalculation of Pakistan’s capabilities and Pakistan Air Force’s competence costed it great international embarrassment when the PAF not only shot down two of its aircraft but also captured its pilot. It is also where Modi’s scheme of flaunting India’s military muscle to its regional rivals and portraying himself as the lone saviour of India went horribly awry.
The aforementioned arguments discussed in the prism of Diversionary War Theory clearly lead to the conclusion that Modi jeopardized regional peace by deploying airpower against Pakistan in order to serve his vested interest of distracting public focus from his internal policy failures in India.
~The writer is a Researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies and can be reached at mahamgillani@gmail.com. This article was first published in Pakistan Observer newspaper.
Recent Articles
- Indian Acquisition of S-400 and US Sanctions: To Be or Not to Be Read more
- Hindutva: BJP’s Anti–Secular Agenda Read more
- PAF and its Modus Operandi Read more
- The Missile Incident and Indian Misinformation Read more
- Indo-US Partnership: Implications for Pakistan Read more
- Saffron Terror: India’s Approach towards Minorities Read more
- India’s Radioactive Bazaar Read more
- Was it Really an Accident? Read more
- Hindu Rashtra: From RSS to BJP Read more
- Ukraine Crisis: India Walking a Tightrope between Kremlin and Washington Read more
- Fascism in India and Silence of the American Government Read more
- Will India contain China? Lessons for the US Read more
- Eroding Indian Democracy Read more
- Military Alliances versus Economic Cooperation Read more
- Regional Implications of BECA between US and India Read more
- Indian Festivities over the S-400 Air Defense System Read more
- The Plight of Indian Muslims: On and Off the Pitch Read more
- The Honour for the Dishonoured Read more
- Unfolding Crisis Involving India’s Nuclear Program Read more
- The Rise and Fall of Indian Secularism Read more
- Rivalries in the Indian Armed Forces Read more
- India’s Dangerous Designs Read more
- Indian Military Procurements: A Scandalous Affair Read more
- Cocktail of Islamophobia and Misogyny in India Read more
- The Sick Man of Asia Read more
- On Trade with India Read more
- All Hands Count Read more
- Strategy of Stage Management Read more
- The S-400 Deal: Will India be able to Balance Relations with Russia and the US? Read more
- Indian Military Modernisation: Response Options for Pakistan Air Force Read more
- COVID-19 Lessons from our Neighbor Read more
- BJP Rule and its Impact on Indian Society Read more
- Modi’s Peace Overture: Genuine or a Trojan Horse? Read more
- What Our Elders Knew Read more
- India’s Balakot Strike: An Analysis Read more
- Unchecked India: A Threat to Peace Read more
- Protesting Farmers and the Indian Agrarian System Read more
- The Hindutva Rate of Growth Read more
- Why the S 400 would not Serve India’s Purpose? Read more
- The Abettors of Rage Read more
- India’s Military Modernization: A Risk to Strategic Equilibrium Read more
- India – A Restless Revisionist State Read more
- Unfolding the Indian Strategy Read more
- Standoff in the Himalayas Read more
- India Falters Amidst the Pandemic Read more
- Coronavirus May Have Exposed India’s Economic Fault Lines Read more
- Towards “The End of India”! Read more
- Pulwama attack: What Compelled Modi to Employ the Air Option? Read more
- The Decade of Dying Secularism in India Read more
- India's Rising Majoritarianism Read more
- India-Pakistan Crises and Nuclear Escalation Dynamics Read more
- Reviewing the Brotherhood in Saffron Read more
- The Underlying Political Deception of BJP in India Read more
- The Myth of Indian Democracy Read more
- Pakistan's response compulsion to India Read more
- Pulwama aftermath; Call to sanity Read more