Identifying Levels of Hybridity in War
Author Name: Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi 08 Aug 2021

Hybrid warfare, as a concept and military strategy, is as old as the warfare itself. It employs a combination of political warfare alongside conventional warfare, irregular warfare and cyber-warfare. It also deploys variety of methods to instigate the people of the target state through media campaigns propagating fake news, diplomatic manoeuvres, manipulation of the workings of international institutions, and even interfering into electoral system.
Pakistan has been subjected to different forms of hybrid warfare over the last five decades, though the terminology gained ground only in recent years. Unfortunately, successive politico-military administrations in Pakistan failed to identify the levels of hybridity correctly and therefore the response prepared and executed was based on evolving situations. Resultantly, Pakistan’s stance was not recognized by the global community, instead the perpetrators of hybrid war, led by India, were able to malign Pakistan for acts done by elements against it.
Therefore, it is necessary to correctly identify the levels of hybridity Pakistan has been subjected to, so that a coherent, sustainable, effective, and an integrated response is developed, and employed successfully.
For the elements of hybrid war to be effective against the target state, it is important that the campaign has an unrelenting support of the political leadership of launching country at the policy level. Such level of commitment by Indian political leadership was visible when it decided to support separatists’ elements in erstwhile East Pakistan. India’s deep involvement in the breakup of Pakistan through the hybrid deployment of integrated elements of hard and soft power was confessed by the incumbent Prime Minister Modi during his visit to Bangladesh in 2015. PM Modi takes pride in his arrest after participating in Satyagraha movement at the age of 20-22. However, the concept of Satyagraha movement as introduced by Gandhi was that of a non-violent movement against the evil, but Modi participated in a violent agitation movement which led to the breakup of Pakistan and created Bangladesh.
At the strategic level of hybridity, all elements of national security led by military establishments are deployed against the target state to achieve the stated objectives. After the creation of Bangladesh in 1971, to further impose existential threats to Pakistan, India carried out its nuclear tests 1974. Concurrently, US imposed sanctions on both India and Pakistan, which was far more harmful to Pakistan as it was refused an atomic reprocessing plant from France, sale of 110 A-7 aircraft from the US, and SAAB 37 Viggen aircraft from Sweden. In the early 1980s, India occupied the vacant and un-demarcated Siachen glacier, by employing the kinetic means of hybrid warfare.
At the operational level of hybridity, India deployed a combination of kinetic and non-kinetic elements of hybrid warfare in the post-nuclearized environment where an all-out conventional war became a distant probability. The same was exposed by European watchdog DisInfoLab through the India Chronicles.
At the tactical level, India has been sponsoring the acts of terror in Karachi and Balochistan for the last two decades, through the active support of local operators, and Indian infiltrators, also highlighted in the Indian Chronicles.
Having identified the levels of hybridity employed against Pakistan, not only by India but also by the US and its allies, through economic and military sanctions in international institutions, such as International Monetary Fund (IMF), and above all the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Recent confession of India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clearly reflects that FATF was used as a political tool against Pakistan as part of a policy decision by India alongside its western allies. Please refer to Dr Usman’s article on the subject available on CASS website.
Therefore, to effectively counter known and unknown hybrid threats which would keep changing faces, Pakistan may formulate a multidimensional strategy which can counter the evolving threats at the corresponding levels of hybridity.
At the policy level, Pakistan may opt to respond to international organizations, institutions, and states collaborating against its vital national interests without any consideration of relationship, because ‘Appeasement is a failed strategy and does not work in international affairs.’ To do so, Pakistan must take its allies and strategic partners in confidence to counter the concerted efforts of its enemies, be it in kinetic or the non-kinetic domain.
At the strategic level, Pakistan may respond by disrupting enemy’s designs through the use of emerging technologies and expose the perpetrators with available evidence. Pakistan must not shy away from raising the levels even if global players are visibly supporting India in its efforts to malign it. Jaishankar’s admission about FATF must be highlighted and the responsible institutions must be questioned about the processes adopted to keep Pakistan in the grey list for so long, despite its best efforts.
At the operational level, apprehended must be summarily tried and punished to create deterrence in the hearts and minds of the potential terrorists. Media campaign must be well orchestrated so that enemy’s efforts do not succeed in demoralizing the people, and local facilitators in the media must not be allowed to sell enemy’s agenda in the garb of freedom of expression.
At the tactical level, Intelligence-Based Operations (IBO) must be continued in areas identified as hotspots. Similarly, Counter-Insurgency (CI), and Counter-terrorism (CT) strategies must be reviewed from time to time due to evolving threats and situations.
Pakistan is once going through troubled waters due to evolving regional environment. India and its western allies are not interested in stability of Pakistan and indeed the region and therefore, are likely to continue their effort of hybrid warfare at all levels, warranting a matching response.
Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of the book ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan.’ This article was first published in The Nation. He is presently working as Director, Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS).
Photo Credit: Etfa Khurshid Mirza

Recent Articles
- The Chinese View of Pakistan Read more
- Colombo’s Sorrow Read more
- Is Ukraine Becoming Europe’s Afghanistan? Read more
- Resurging Terrorism in Pakistan: What needs to be Done? Read more
- Social Media and Politics in Pakistan Read more
- Revisiting Counterterrorism Strategies of Pakistan Read more
- Initiatives to stimulate Pak-Afghan Bilateral Trade Read more
- The Durand Line Debate Read more
- Introducing ‘Realizm’ Read more
- OIC’s Council on Foreign Ministers Meeting & Pakistan’s Commitment towards Ending Humanitarian Crisis in Afghanistan Read more
- Rays of Hope in Kabul’s Winter Read more
- The Endgame Read more
- Spoilers cannot be Peace Builders Read more
- Disbanded Afghan Security Forces, Reinforcing IS-K and Regional Security Read more
- Taliban’s Rise is Changing the Security Landscape in Pakistan Read more
- Afghanistan deserves a Marshall Plan Plus Read more
- Déjà vu Moments Read more
- Effects of Ethnicity on Afghanistan’s Politics Read more
- Afghanistan and its Uncertainties Read more
- The Dilemma of Women in Afghanistan Read more
- Afghanistan 2.0:Development, Implications & Policy Options for Pakistan Read more
- The Taliban’s Ascendance in Afghanistan: Implications for Pakistan Read more
- Afghanistan under Taliban: Beginning of a New Era? Read more
- Refugee Influx: Need to Learn from Past Experience Read more
- Prospects for Peace in Afghanistan: The Way Forward for Pakistan Read more
- Prospects of Pak-Iran Relations under President Raisi’s Government Read more
- The Need for Productive Engagement with New Afghan Government Read more
- How Corruption Aided Taliban’s Takeover Read more
- Countering Dubious Indo-US Designs in Afghanistan Read more
- Social Media: A Weapon of Mass Manipulation Read more
- Why is China Stepping up Geopolitics in Afghanistan? Read more
- The Economic Battle for Kabul Read more
- Victims of Wars in Afghanistan Read more
- The Fall of Kabul: A Public Value Perspective Read more
- Taliban here and Across the Khyber Read more
- Taliban Offensive and Abject Surrender of Afghan Forces Read more
- Seven Decades after Partition Read more
- The Afghan Imbroglio: A Pakistani Perspective Read more
- Hybrid Mannerism of the Terrorists and the State’s Response Read more
- Identifying Levels of Hybridity in War Read more
- The Second Wave of COVID-19 in Pakistan Read more
- While FATF Sleeps Read more
- پاکستان کی کورونا وائرس کے خلاف کامیابی کی اہم وجوہات Read more
- Iran joining the BRI: An Opportunity for Pakistan Read more
- Russia as a Resurgent Power - a Critical Analysis Read more
- Article 370: What Made PM Narendra Modi do it? Read more
- The Repulsive Face of Ultra-Nationalism Read more
- Pakistan’s Decisive Time to Act on its Weakening Kashmir Cause Read more
- End of Humanity! Read more
- Disputing the Disputed Status Read more
- The New Delhi Nazis Read more
- The implied truth Read more
- Modi, Media, Military a dangerous combination Read more
- The 'Reichstag Fire'of Pulwama Read more
- Pulwama, where was the world order? Read more
- The last sigh of Modi government Read more
- India's fake news calamity Read more
- War cost for India: half a trillion dollars Read more
- Sinking deeper into abyss Read more
- Decoding the Australian terrorist's manifesto Read more
- Time to Change our Approach Read more
- THE BLEEDING VALLEY Read more
- The cognitive dissonance of Indian Life Read more
- Has the FATF Failed? Read more
- PAF 'Ops Swift Retort' and effectiveness of Air Power Read more
- Why the fear? Read more
- Ijtamai Kifayat Sheari aur Usky Asraat Read more
- The Maturity of Debts and Governments Read more
- Indian Armed Forces – Myth and Reality Read more
- Time for a Public Finance Management Act Read more
- Implication of Abrogation of Article 370 Read more